Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Software - Infrastructure
Oil & Gas Midstream
Software - Infrastructure
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Marine Shipping | Software - Infrastructure | Oil & Gas Midstream | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $47M | $511M | $307M | $1.74B | $451M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $331M | $313M | $348M | $953M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-719M | $59M | $-259M | $75M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 61.8% | 55.4% | 52.9% | 21.4% |
| Operating Margin | -127.9% | 43.1% | -35.9% | 50.6% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.1x | 3.9x | 18.5x | 5.8x |
| Total Debt | $795M | $1.31B | $437M | $1.85B | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $165M | $116M | $448M | $77M |
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSP Recovery, Inc. (MSPR) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 121.4 | +21.4% |
| Repay Holdings Corp… (RPAY) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 140.5 | +40.5% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 46.9 | -53.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 136.8% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8%
CLCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 14.2%
- 14.2% yield, vs FLNG's 9.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +62.5% vs MSPR's -99.7%
RPAY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (3.9x vs 5.8x)
FLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 240.5% 10Y total return vs CLCO's 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 3.03x
- Beta 0.15, yield 9.3%, current ratio 3.03x
- 21.5% margin vs MSPR's -73.3%
PRTH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.3%, EPS growth 319.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 136.8% revenue growth vs CLCO's -10.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.9x vs 5.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs MSPR's -73.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs PRTH's 2.12 | |
| Dividends | 14.2% yield, vs FLNG's 9.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.5% vs MSPR's -99.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs MSPR's -41.4%, ROIC 6.1% vs -69.7% |
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories
RPAY leads 1 • MSPR leads 0 • CLCO leads 0 • PRTH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $953M annually — 97.1x MSPR's $10M. FLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSPR's -73.3%. On growth, CLCO holds the edge at +9.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $331M | $313M | $348M | $953M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$659M | $222M | -$10M | $252M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$719M | $59M | -$259M | $75M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$348M | $61M | $133M | $75M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +61.8% | +55.4% | +52.9% | +21.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -127.9% | +43.1% | -35.9% | +50.6% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -73.3% | +17.8% | -82.7% | +21.5% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -107.9% | -105.0% | +19.4% | +38.4% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -94.6% | +9.9% | +4.5% | -3.7% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | -100.0% | -34.4% | -52.4% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
RPAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, CLCO trades at a 77% valuation discount to FLNG's 23.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRTH's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FLNG's 12.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47M | $511M | $307M | $1.7B | $451M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $830M | $1.7B | $629M | $3.1B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | 5.31x | -1.16x | 23.36x | 8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.09x | 3.86x | 18.53x | 5.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.41x | 6.98x | 12.46x | 6.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 1.59x | 0.99x | 5.02x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.68x | 0.62x | 2.42x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.37x | 12.93x | 6.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RPAY and FLNG and PRTH each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLNG delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-56 for MSPR. RPAY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.91x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs MSPR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.9% | +7.5% | -46.6% | +10.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.4% | +2.6% | -20.3% | +2.9% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -69.7% | +6.7% | -1.0% | +6.1% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -67.7% | +8.7% | -1.0% | +7.1% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.72x | 0.91x | 2.57x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $782M | $1.1B | $321M | $1.4B | $969M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $165M | $116M | $448M | $77M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $795M | $1.3B | $437M | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.49x | 1.36x | -36.81x | 1.81x | 1.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLNG five years ago would be worth $39,349 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23 for MSPR. Over the past 12 months, CLCO leads with a +62.5% total return vs MSPR's -99.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 14.6% vs MSPR's -86.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -58.4% | +0.3% | -3.6% | +33.7% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.7% | +62.5% | -7.9% | +47.0% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +6.2% | -44.3% | +27.6% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +1.9% | -83.8% | +293.5% | -15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +1.9% | -63.8% | +240.5% | -43.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -86.8% | +2.0% | -17.7% | +8.4% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLCO and FLNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRTH's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLCO currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs MSPR's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.16x | 1.57x | 0.15x | 2.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.00 | $10.00 | $6.06 | $33.40 | $8.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.03 | $5.78 | $2.30 | $21.72 | $4.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +96.7% | +57.6% | +96.5% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 41.8 | 48.9 | 57.0 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 46K | 104K | 2.0M | 617K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLCO and PRTH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CLCO as "Hold", RPAY as "Buy", FLNG as "Hold", PRTH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.6% upside for PRTH (target: $11) vs -25.6% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, CLCO offers the higher dividend yield at 14.24% vs FLNG's 9.31%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $6.83 | $24.00 | $11.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 17 | 2 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +14.2% | — | +9.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.38 | — | $3.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.5% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
FLNG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RPAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MSPR vs CLCO vs RPAY vs FLNG vs PRTH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MSP Recovery, Inc.
(MSPR) is the stronger pick with 136. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (12. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
On trailing P/E, Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Repay Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 3. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
Over the past 5 years, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) delivered a total return of +293. 5%, compared to -99. 8% for MSP Recovery, Inc. (MSPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNG returned +240. 5% versus MSPR's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning PRTH is approximately 1285% more volatile than FLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MSP Recovery, Inc.
(MSPR) is pulling ahead at 136. 8% versus -10. 8% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Repay Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLCO leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 4% net margin versus -1975. 4% for MSP Recovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus -69. 8% for MSPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Repay Holdings Corporation (RPAY) trades at 3.
9x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for FLEX LNG Ltd. — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRTH: 99. 6% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH?
In this comparison, CLCO (14.
2% yield), FLNG (9. 3% yield) pay a dividend. MSPR, RPAY, PRTH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSPR or CLCO or RPAY or FLNG or PRTH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 3% yield, +240. 5% 10Y return). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +240. 5%, PRTH: -43. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSPR and CLCO and RPAY and FLNG and PRTH?
These companies operate in different sectors (MSPR (Healthcare) and CLCO (Industrials) and RPAY (Technology) and FLNG (Energy) and PRTH (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MSPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; RPAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLCO, FLNG pay a dividend while MSPR, RPAY, PRTH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.