Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MSW
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-71.6%
CNEY
CN Energy Group. Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-90.9%
GPRE
Green Plains Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.27B
5Y Perf.+68.4%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-18.9%
REX
REX American Resources Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.64B
5Y Perf.+129.4%

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MSW logoMSW
CNEY logoCNEY
GPRE logoGPRE
CLPS logoCLPS
REX logoREX
IndustryEngineering & ConstructionChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyInformation Technology ServicesChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23M$4M$1.27B$25M$1.64B
Revenue (TTM)$34M$87M$1.94B$299M$651M
Net Income (TTM)$-6M$-25M$-15M$-4M$50M
Gross Margin-3.9%-8.6%1.8%22.8%12.7%
Operating Margin-15.8%-26.1%1.2%-1.4%8.6%
Forward P/E29.5x64.1x
Total Debt$8M$3M$508M$34M$21M
Cash & Equiv.$250K$391K$182M$28M$196M

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MSW
CNEY
GPRE
CLPS
REX
StockNov 24May 26Return
Ming Shing Group Ho… (MSW)10028.4-71.6%
CN Energy Group. In… (CNEY)1009.1-90.9%
Green Plains Inc. (GPRE)100168.4+68.4%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10081.1-18.9%
REX American Resour… (REX)100229.4+129.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GPRE and CLPS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. REX and MSW also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MSW
Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited
The Growth Play

MSW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth -400.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
  • 22.8% revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2%
Best for: growth exposure
CNEY
CN Energy Group. Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CNEY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
GPRE
Green Plains Inc.
The Value Play

GPRE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (29.5x vs 64.1x)
  • +373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1%
Best for: value and momentum
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
  • Beta 0.19 vs GPRE's 1.15, lower leverage
  • 14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
REX
REX American Resources Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

REX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 476.3% 10Y total return vs GPRE's 32.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
  • Beta 0.28, current ratio 8.64x
  • 7.7% margin vs CNEY's -29.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMSW logoMSW22.8% revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2%
ValueGPRE logoGPRELower P/E (29.5x vs 64.1x)
Quality / MarginsREX logoREX7.7% margin vs CNEY's -29.1%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.19 vs GPRE's 1.15, lower leverage
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GPRE logoGPRE+373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1%
Efficiency (ROA)REX logoREX6.7% ROA vs MSW's -45.3%, ROIC 11.4% vs -52.1%

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MSWMing Shing Group Holdings Limited
FY 2025
Private
66.7%$23M
Public
33.3%$11M
CNEYCN Energy Group. Inc.
FY 2025
Activated Carbon
100.0%$36M
GPREGreen Plains Inc.
FY 2025
Products And Services Other
101.2%$94M
Intersegment Revenues
-1.2%$-1,119,000
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
REXREX American Resources Corporation
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$329,000

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLREXLAGGINGGPRE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS and REX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 57.2x MSW's $34M. REX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNEY's -29.1%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$34M$87M$1.9B$299M$651M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M$122M-$1M$67M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$25M-$15M-$4M$50M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$90M$0$18M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-3.9%-8.6%+1.8%+22.8%+12.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.8%-26.1%+1.2%-1.4%+8.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-16.9%-29.1%-0.8%-1.3%+7.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-23.5%-4.7%+4.7%-2.3%+2.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.4%-25.9%+15.3%+0.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.2%+134.2%+75.8%+2.9%
Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS and REX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — CNEY and GPRE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, REX's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 112.3x.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
Market CapShares × price$23M$4M$1.3B$25M$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$30M$7M$1.6B$31M$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.67x-0.04x-10.11x-3.46x30.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.29.48x64.10x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.57x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple112.32x16.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.67x0.12x0.61x0.15x2.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.19x0.00x1.59x0.43x2.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.71x
Evenly matched — CNEY and GPRE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

REX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

REX delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for MSW. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSW's 7.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REX scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-5.8%-24.9%-2.0%-6.1%+7.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-45.3%-23.5%-1.0%-3.2%+6.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-52.1%-8.2%-5.2%-7.9%+11.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-133.1%-11.0%-6.2%-9.8%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–933425
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage7.87x0.03x0.66x0.59x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7M$3M$326M$6M-$175M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$249,923$390,706$182M$28M$196M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$3M$508M$34M$21M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.52x-29.77x-0.08x
REX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $38,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $58 for CNEY. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +373.7% total return vs CNEY's -84.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 51.8% vs CNEY's -50.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.2%+19.8%+76.9%-10.9%+53.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-51.8%-84.1%+373.7%-9.4%+145.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%-87.5%-41.2%+0.0%+250.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%-99.4%-39.3%-69.2%+290.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-68.5%-99.6%+32.9%-78.6%+476.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-32.0%-50.0%-16.2%+0.0%+51.8%
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRE's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRE currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs CNEY's 10.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.15x0.44x1.15x0.19x0.28x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$8.11$7.36$18.94$1.88$53.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.60$0.31$3.39$0.80$19.44
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+21.7%+10.3%+96.0%+47.9%+93.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.253.849.946.861.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded75K634K1.5M15K204K
Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GPRE as "Buy", REX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.8% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -9.3% for GPRE (target: $17). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMSW logoMSWMing Shing Group …CNEY logoCNEYCN Energy Group. …GPRE logoGPREGreen Plains Inc.CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationREX logoREXREX American Reso…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50$60.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts203
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.4%0.0%+0.9%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

REX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallREX American Resources Corp… (REX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is the stronger pick with 22.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). REX American Resources Corporation (REX) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E (64. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

On forward P/E, Green Plains Inc.

is actually cheaper at 29. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +290.

0%, compared to -99. 4% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +476. 3% versus CNEY's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

19β versus Green Plains Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning GPRE is approximately 491% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 8% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is pulling ahead at 22.

8% versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CN Energy Group. Inc. grew EPS 79. 2% year-over-year, compared to -400. 0% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSW leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

1% net margin versus -31. 3% for CN Energy Group. Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus -30. 9% for CNEY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPS leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Green Plains Inc.

(GPRE) trades at 29. 5x forward P/E versus 64. 1x for REX American Resources Corporation — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 20. 8% to $60. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

7% yield) pays a dividend. MSW, CNEY, GPRE, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

19), 14. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, MSW: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MSW and CNEY and GPRE and CLPS and REX?

These companies operate in different sectors (MSW (Industrials) and CNEY (Basic Materials) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and CLPS (Technology) and REX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MSW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNEY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while MSW, CNEY, GPRE, REX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MSW

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNEY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPRE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

REX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MSW and CNEY and GPRE and CLPS and REX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MSW: 22.8% · CNEY: -2.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.