Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Information Technology Services
Chemicals - Specialty
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Information Technology Services | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $23M | $4M | $1.27B | $25M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34M | $87M | $1.94B | $299M | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-25M | $-15M | $-4M | $50M |
| Gross Margin | -3.9% | -8.6% | 1.8% | 22.8% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | -26.1% | 1.2% | -1.4% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 29.5x | — | 64.1x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $3M | $508M | $34M | $21M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250K | $391K | $182M | $28M | $196M |
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ming Shing Group Ho… (MSW) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
| CN Energy Group. In… (CNEY) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) | 100 | 168.4 | +68.4% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
| REX American Resour… (REX) | 100 | 229.4 | +129.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.8%, EPS growth -400.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.0%
- 22.8% revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2%
Among these 5 stocks, CNEY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GPRE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Lower P/E (29.5x vs 64.1x)
- +373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1%
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
- Beta 0.19 vs GPRE's 1.15, lower leverage
- 14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
REX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 476.3% 10Y total return vs GPRE's 32.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 8.64x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 8.64x
- 7.7% margin vs CNEY's -29.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.8% revenue growth vs CNEY's -30.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.5x vs 64.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs CNEY's -29.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs GPRE's 1.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +373.7% vs CNEY's -84.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs MSW's -45.3%, ROIC 11.4% vs -52.1% |
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • MSW leads 0 • CNEY leads 0 • GPRE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS and REX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 57.2x MSW's $34M. REX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNEY's -29.1%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34M | $87M | $1.9B | $299M | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$19M | $122M | -$1M | $67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$25M | -$15M | -$4M | $50M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$4M | $90M | $0 | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -8.6% | +1.8% | +22.8% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | -26.1% | +1.2% | -1.4% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.9% | -29.1% | -0.8% | -1.3% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -23.5% | -4.7% | +4.7% | -2.3% | +2.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.4% | -25.9% | +15.3% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +94.2% | +134.2% | +75.8% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CNEY and GPRE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, REX's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPRE's 112.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $4M | $1.3B | $25M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $7M | $1.6B | $31M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.67x | -0.04x | -10.11x | -3.46x | 30.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 29.48x | — | 64.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 112.32x | — | 16.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 0.12x | 0.61x | 0.15x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.19x | 0.00x | 1.59x | 0.43x | 2.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.71x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
REX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REX delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-6 for MSW. REX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSW's 7.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REX scores 5/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.8% | -24.9% | -2.0% | -6.1% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.3% | -23.5% | -1.0% | -3.2% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.1% | -8.2% | -5.2% | -7.9% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -133.1% | -11.0% | -6.2% | -9.8% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.87x | 0.03x | 0.66x | 0.59x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $3M | $326M | $6M | -$175M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $249,923 | $390,706 | $182M | $28M | $196M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $3M | $508M | $34M | $21M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.52x | -29.77x | -0.08x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
REX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REX five years ago would be worth $38,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $58 for CNEY. Over the past 12 months, GPRE leads with a +373.7% total return vs CNEY's -84.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REX at 51.8% vs CNEY's -50.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +76.2% | +19.8% | +76.9% | -10.9% | +53.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -51.8% | -84.1% | +373.7% | -9.4% | +145.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -87.5% | -41.2% | +0.0% | +250.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -99.4% | -39.3% | -69.2% | +290.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.5% | -99.6% | +32.9% | -78.6% | +476.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.0% | -50.0% | -16.2% | +0.0% | +51.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GPRE and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRE's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GPRE currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs CNEY's 10.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 0.44x | 1.15x | 0.19x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.11 | $7.36 | $18.94 | $1.88 | $53.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $0.31 | $3.39 | $0.80 | $19.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.7% | +10.3% | +96.0% | +47.9% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.2 | 53.8 | 49.9 | 46.8 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 634K | 1.5M | 15K | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GPRE as "Buy", REX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.8% upside for REX (target: $60) vs -9.3% for GPRE (target: $17). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.50 | — | $60.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 20 | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +14.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.9% |
REX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
MSW vs CNEY vs GPRE vs CLPS vs REX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is the stronger pick with 22.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). REX American Resources Corporation (REX) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E (64. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Green Plains Inc. (GPRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
On forward P/E, Green Plains Inc.
is actually cheaper at 29. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
Over the past 5 years, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) delivered a total return of +290.
0%, compared to -99. 4% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REX returned +476. 3% versus CNEY's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Green Plains Inc. 's 1. 15β — meaning GPRE is approximately 491% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REX American Resources Corporation (REX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 8% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited (MSW) is pulling ahead at 22.
8% versus -30. 2% for CN Energy Group. Inc. (CNEY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CN Energy Group. Inc. grew EPS 79. 2% year-over-year, compared to -400. 0% for Ming Shing Group Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSW leads at 33. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
REX American Resources Corporation (REX) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
1% net margin versus -31. 3% for CN Energy Group. Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REX leads at 10. 0% versus -30. 9% for CNEY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLPS leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Green Plains Inc.
(GPRE) trades at 29. 5x forward P/E versus 64. 1x for REX American Resources Corporation — 34. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REX: 20. 8% to $60. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MSW, CNEY, GPRE, REX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSW or CNEY or GPRE or CLPS or REX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, MSW: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSW and CNEY and GPRE and CLPS and REX?
These companies operate in different sectors (MSW (Industrials) and CNEY (Basic Materials) and GPRE (Basic Materials) and CLPS (Technology) and REX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MSW is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNEY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GPRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; REX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while MSW, CNEY, GPRE, REX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.