Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Uranium
Aluminum
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Uranium | Aluminum |
| Market Cap | $3.97B | $12.28B | $5.80B | $4.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.92B | $305M | $85M | $9.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $-71M | $-70M | $441M |
| Gross Margin | 15.8% | 8.3% | 37.3% | 13.1% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | -36.4% | -108.3% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | 30.0x | 274.3x | — | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $601M | $1.04B | $676M | $1.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $1.17B | $65M | $120M |
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materion Corporation (MTRN) | 100 | 310.7 | +210.7% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 1547.0 | +1447.0% |
| Constellium SE (CSTM) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 0.3%
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
- 0.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs UUUU's -15.6%
- Beta 1.40 vs CSTM's 1.85, lower leverage
UUUU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 10.0% 10Y total return vs MTRN's 7.2%
- +391.8% vs MTRN's +163.9%
CSTM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 4.7% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
- 8.0% ROA vs UUUU's -6.5%, ROIC 13.4% vs -8.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs UUUU's -15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs UUUU's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs CSTM's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +391.8% vs MTRN's +163.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs UUUU's -6.5%, ROIC 13.4% vs -8.5% |
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CSTM leads in 3 of 6 categories
UUUU leads 1 • MTRN leads 1 • MP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSTM is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.3B annually — 109.5x UUUU's $85M. CSTM is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UUUU's -82.7%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $305M | $85M | $9.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $187M | -$43M | -$94M | $978M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | -$71M | -$70M | $441M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$314M | -$87M | $175M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +8.3% | +37.3% | +13.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -36.4% | -108.3% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | -23.3% | -82.7% | +4.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -102.8% | -102.5% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | +49.1% | +112.1% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +121.4% | +64.2% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, CSTM trades at a 68% valuation discount to MTRN's 53.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CSTM's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTRN's 24.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $12.3B | $5.8B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $12.2B | $6.4B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 53.37x | -138.26x | -63.14x | 17.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.96x | 274.33x | — | 10.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.67x | — | — | 7.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.22x | 44.59x | 87.96x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.24x | 4.92x | 7.96x | 4.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 79.54x | — | — | 28.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSTM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSTM delivers a 46.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-10 for UUUU. MP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSTM's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSTM scores 8/9 vs UUUU's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | -3.7% | -10.2% | +46.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | -2.0% | -6.5% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | -4.7% | -8.5% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | -4.2% | -10.5% | +13.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.44x | 0.99x | 2.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $587M | -$123M | $611M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $1.2B | $65M | $120M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $601M | $1.0B | $676M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.07x | -2.80x | — | 7.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UUUU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UUUU five years ago would be worth $37,257 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,144 for CSTM. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +391.8% total return vs MTRN's +163.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 56.9% vs MTRN's 22.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.8% | +25.8% | +40.0% | +66.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +163.9% | +192.7% | +391.8% | +205.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.9% | +221.7% | +286.1% | +112.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.6% | +149.7% | +272.6% | +91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +724.3% | +591.3% | +996.7% | +503.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.7% | +47.6% | +56.9% | +28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MP and CSTM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CSTM's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSTM currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs MP's 69.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 1.40x | 1.85x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $201.88 | $100.25 | $27.90 | $33.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $70.94 | $18.64 | $4.20 | $10.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +69.0% | +83.7% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.0 | 66.8 | 62.1 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 5.6M | 10.1M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
MTRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MTRN as "Buy", MP as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", CSTM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.2% upside for MP (target: $78) vs -15.7% for MTRN (target: $161). MTRN is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $161.00 | $78.25 | $24.08 | $35.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 11 | 8 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.9% | +2.6% |
CSTM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). UUUU leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
MTRN vs MP vs UUUU vs CSTM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Constellium SE (CSTM) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Materion Corporation (MTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
On trailing P/E, Constellium SE (CSTM) is the cheapest at 17.
1x versus Materion Corporation at 53. 4x. On forward P/E, Constellium SE is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Fuels Inc.
(UUUU) delivered a total return of +272. 6%, compared to +91. 4% for Constellium SE (CSTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UUUU returned +996. 7% versus CSTM's +503. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Constellium SE's 1. 85β — meaning CSTM is approximately 32% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MP Materials Corp. (MP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 2% for Constellium SE — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for Energy Fuels Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
2% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTRN leads at 6. 5% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UUUU leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Constellium SE (CSTM) trades at 10.
4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 263. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MP: 13. 2% to $78. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM?
In this comparison, MTRN (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MP, UUUU, CSTM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTRN or MP or UUUU or CSTM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+591. 3% 10Y return). Constellium SE (CSTM) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MP: +591. 3%, CSTM: +503. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTRN and MP and UUUU and CSTM?
These companies operate in different sectors (MTRN (Basic Materials) and MP (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and CSTM (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.