Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+158.6%
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.63B
5Y Perf.+215.0%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.99B
5Y Perf.+428.6%

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MUX logoMUX
CDE logoCDE
HL logoHL
EXK logoEXK
IndustryOther Precious MetalsGoldGoldOther Precious Metals
Market Cap$1.39B$11.63B$12.13B$2.99B
Revenue (TTM)$162M$2.57B$1.57B$330M
Net Income (TTM)$74M$799M$559M$-94M
Gross Margin32.9%35.4%50.9%9.3%
Operating Margin22.2%39.4%44.1%-1.7%
Forward P/E22.2x9.1x19.1x14.3x
Total Debt$926K$365M$299M$120M
Cash & Equiv.$51M$554M$242M$106M

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MUX
CDE
HL
EXK
StockMay 20May 26Return
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100258.6+158.6%
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)100315.0+215.0%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%
Endeavour Silver Co… (EXK)100528.6+428.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. McEwen Mining Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. CDE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Income Pick

MUX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
  • 45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
  • 0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
CDE
Coeur Mining, Inc.
The Growth Play

CDE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 96.4%, EPS growth 5.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.1%
  • 96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
  • Lower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Best for: growth exposure
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Long-Run Compounder

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs CDE's 149.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
  • Beta 1.26, yield 0.1%, current ratio 2.72x
  • Beta 1.26 vs CDE's 1.81
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
EXK
Endeavour Silver Corp.
The Value Angle

EXK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: basic materials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCDE logoCDE96.4% revenue growth vs EXK's 5.9%
ValueCDE logoCDELower P/E (9.1x vs 14.3x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs EXK's -28.4%
Stability / SafetyHL logoHLBeta 1.26 vs CDE's 1.81
DividendsMUX logoMUX0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs EXK's +193.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs EXK's -9.2%, ROIC 15.3% vs 1.5%

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.
FY 2025
Gold
64.9%$1.3B
Product, Silver
35.1%$726M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000
EXKEndeavour Silver Corp.
FY 2024
Concentrate Sales
101.1%$71M
Provisional Pricing Adjustments
-1.1%$-776,000

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCDELAGGINGEXK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

CDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 15.9x MUX's $162M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EXK's -28.4%. On growth, EXK holds the edge at +154.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$162M$2.6B$1.6B$330M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$61M$1.2B$853M$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$74M$799M$559M-$94M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M$915M$472M-$129M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.9%+35.4%+50.9%+9.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+39.4%+44.1%-1.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.7%+31.1%+35.6%-28.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.7%+35.6%+30.0%-39.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+137.8%+57.4%+154.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%+4.9%-160.0%-97.5%
Evenly matched — CDE and HL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 20.1x trailing earnings, CDE trades at a 49% valuation discount to MUX's 39.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CDE's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EXK's 76.0x.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$11.6B$12.1B$3.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$11.4B$12.2B$3.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS39.61x20.13x36.92x-78.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.21x9.10x19.07x14.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple74.65x11.19x17.25x76.02x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.03x5.62x8.53x13.72x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.31x3.56x4.58x5.07x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.48x39.11x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-18 for EXK. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXK's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs EXK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.6%+15.2%+22.5%-18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.0%+11.2%+16.3%-9.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.9%+23.5%+15.3%+1.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.9%+23.9%+16.8%+1.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95684
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.11x0.12x0.25x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$50M-$188M$57M$14M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$554M$242M$106M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$926,000$365M$299M$120M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.52x47.33x19.04x-39.17x
CDE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,111 for EXK. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs EXK's +193.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDE at 72.6% vs EXK's 34.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.1%+3.2%-4.1%+12.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+198.5%+216.1%+271.0%+193.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+163.5%+414.6%+194.9%+144.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.8%+96.0%+150.3%+61.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.1%+149.9%+360.6%+182.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.1%+72.6%+43.4%+34.6%
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MUX and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDE's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x1.81x1.26x1.71x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.70$27.77$34.17$15.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.88$5.55$4.68$3.14
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.7%+65.2%+52.9%+67.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.049.346.647.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded992K22.2M15.4M9.4M
Evenly matched — MUX and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MUX as "Buy", CDE as "Buy", HL as "Hold", EXK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.1% upside for CDE (target: $29) vs 25.6% for EXK (target: $13). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.CDE logoCDECoeur Mining, Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…EXK logoEXKEndeavour Silver …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$29.00$23.83$12.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts7212614
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.0%0.0%
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CDE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). HL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCoeur Mining, Inc. (CDE)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MUX vs CDE vs HL vs EXK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MUX or CDE or HL or EXK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the stronger pick with 96. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

On trailing P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the cheapest at 20. 1x versus McEwen Mining Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Coeur Mining, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to +61. 1% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus MUX's -0. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

26β versus Coeur Mining, Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning CDE is approximately 44% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 25% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is pulling ahead at 96. 4% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CDE leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MUX or CDE or HL or EXK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Coeur Mining, Inc.

(CDE) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDE: 60. 1% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MUX or CDE or HL or EXK?

In this comparison, MUX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CDE, HL, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MUX or CDE or HL or EXK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, CDE: +149. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MUX and CDE and HL and EXK?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDE

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 77%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MUX and CDE and HL and EXK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MUX: -100.0% · CDE: 137.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(MUX: 45.7% · CDE: 31.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MUX: 39.6x · CDE: 20.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.