Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MWA vs AWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
MWA vs AWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $4.24B | $24.54B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $5.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $207M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 36.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.8x | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $452M | $15.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $432M | $119M |
MWA vs AWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 290.6 | +190.6% |
| American Water Work… (AWK) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MWA vs AWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MWA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 181.9% 10Y total return vs AWK's 100.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 46.0%, current ratio 3.54x
- PEG 0.85 vs AWK's 2.62
AWK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta -0.48, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 5.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.7%
- 9.7% revenue growth vs MWA's 8.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs MWA's 8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.8x vs 20.6x), PEG 0.85 vs 2.62 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.2% margin vs MWA's 14.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (46.0% vs 146.9%) | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.3% vs AWK's -13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs AWK's 3.1%, ROIC 19.7% vs 5.5% |
MWA vs AWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MWA vs AWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWK is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 3.6x MWA's $1.5B. AWK is the more profitable business, keeping 21.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MWA's 14.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $207M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $171M | -$1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +36.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +21.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | -3.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MWA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.0x trailing earnings, AWK trades at a 1% valuation discount to MWA's 22.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MWA offers better value at 1.01x vs AWK's 2.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $40.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.25x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.82x | 20.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.01x | 2.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.20x | 14.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.97x | 4.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.35x | 2.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA delivers a 20.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $10 for AWK. MWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AWK's 1.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs AWK's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 1.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $15.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $452M | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.98x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MWA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MWA five years ago would be worth $19,079 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,133 for AWK. Over the past 12 months, MWA leads with a +8.3% total return vs AWK's -13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MWA at 23.9% vs AWK's -2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.7% | -2.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.3% | -13.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.4% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.8% | -8.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.9% | +100.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.9% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MWA and AWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWK is the less volatile stock with a -0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MWA's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MWA currently trades 87.5% from its 52-week high vs AWK's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | -0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.00 | $150.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.74 | $121.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.5% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 993K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
AWK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MWA as "Hold" and AWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.8% upside for MWA (target: $33) vs 7.2% for AWK (target: $135). For income investors, AWK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs MWA's 0.98%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.33 | $134.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.27 | $3.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
MWA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AWK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MWA vs AWK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MWA or AWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 7% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MWA or AWK?
On trailing P/E, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the cheapest at 22. 0x versus Mueller Water Products, Inc. at 22. 2x. On forward P/E, Mueller Water Products, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Water Products, Inc. wins at 0. 85x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 62x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MWA or AWK?
Over the past 5 years, Mueller Water Products, Inc.
(MWA) delivered a total return of +90. 8%, compared to -8. 7% for American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MWA returned +181. 9% versus AWK's +100. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MWA or AWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 48β versus Mueller Water Products, Inc. 's 1. 02β — meaning MWA is approximately -312% more volatile than AWK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 147% for American Water Works Company, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MWA or AWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus 8. 7% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to 5. 8% for American Water Works Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWK leads at 10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MWA or AWK?
American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 13. 4% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWK leads at 36. 6% versus 18. 2% for MWA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWK leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MWA or AWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 85x versus American Water Works Company, Inc. 's 2. 62x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 6x for American Water Works Company, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MWA: 22. 8% to $33. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MWA or AWK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 1. 0% for Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA).
09Is MWA or AWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Water Works Company, Inc.
(AWK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 48), 2. 6% yield, +100. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWK: +100. 9%, MWA: +181. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MWA and AWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MWA (Industrials) and AWK (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.