Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Engineering & Construction
Banks - Regional
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Conglomerates | Engineering & Construction | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.21B | $9.95B | $5.86B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.46B | $4.16B | $7.49B | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $207M | $345M | $248M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 30.4% | 10.4% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 10.8% | 4.9% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 22.3x | 18.1x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $452M | $1.06B | $1.28B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $432M | $187M | $541M | $668M |
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mueller Water Produ… (MWA) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| Valmont Industries,… (VMI) | 100 | 446.7 | +346.7% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MWA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 1.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 46.0%, current ratio 3.54x
- PEG 0.84 vs TRMK's 1.42
- Beta 1.02, yield 1.0%, current ratio 3.54x
VMI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +70.2% vs MWA's +14.9%
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 51.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- 402.0% 10Y total return vs VMI's 302.2%
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs VMI's 0.7%
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 18.1x)
- 20.0% margin vs PRIM's 3.3%
- Beta 0.94 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs VMI's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 18.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs PRIM's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs PRIM's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MWA's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.2% vs MWA's +14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs TRMK's 1.2%, ROIC 19.7% vs 7.1% |
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories
MWA leads 1 • PRIM leads 1 • VMI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 6.7x TRMK's $1.1B. TRMK is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRIM's 3.3%. On growth, VMI holds the edge at +6.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $4.2B | $7.5B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $333M | $560M | $437M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $207M | $345M | $248M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $171M | $419M | $165M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +30.4% | +10.4% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +10.8% | +4.9% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +8.3% | +3.3% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +10.1% | +2.2% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | +6.2% | -5.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | +27.5% | -60.5% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 60% valuation discount to VMI's 30.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MWA offers better value at 1.00x vs TRMK's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $10.0B | $5.9B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $10.8B | $6.6B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.04x | 30.33x | 21.52x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.65x | 22.34x | 18.06x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.00x | 1.47x | 1.17x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.07x | 17.72x | 13.03x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.94x | 2.43x | 0.77x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 6.18x | 3.52x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.45x | 31.96x | 17.20x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MWA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VMI delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $11 for TRMK. MWA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRIM's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MWA scores 7/9 vs PRIM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.7% | +20.9% | +15.2% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +10.2% | +5.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.7% | +16.3% | +13.6% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.8% | +20.3% | +16.3% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.64x | 0.76x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $20M | $869M | $735M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $432M | $187M | $541M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $452M | $1.1B | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.98x | 11.20x | 21.02x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRIM five years ago would be worth $33,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,756 for TRMK. Over the past 12 months, VMI leads with a +70.2% total return vs MWA's +14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 64.7% vs VMI's 21.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.6% | +23.9% | -17.2% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.9% | +70.2% | +62.4% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.7% | +81.0% | +346.5% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.1% | +98.9% | +234.4% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.4% | +302.2% | +402.0% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.6% | +21.9% | +64.7% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
TRMK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRMK is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRIM's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 1.25x | 1.83x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.00 | $528.49 | $205.50 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.74 | $299.24 | $65.23 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +96.4% | +52.6% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.2 | 75.5 | 30.3 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 196K | 1.1M | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MWA and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MWA as "Hold", VMI as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.7% upside for PRIM (target: $161) vs -6.6% for VMI (target: $476). For income investors, TRMK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.15% vs PRIM's 0.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.33 | $475.50 | $160.63 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 14 | 22 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +0.5% | +0.3% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.27 | $2.63 | $0.32 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.0% | +0.2% | +3.0% |
TRMK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MWA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MWA vs VMI vs PRIM vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Valmont Industries, Inc. (VMI). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Valmont Industries, Inc. at 30. 3x. On forward P/E, Trustmark Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mueller Water Products, Inc. wins at 0. 84x versus Trustmark Corporation's 1. 42x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) delivered a total return of +234.
4%, compared to +47. 6% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRIM returned +402. 0% versus TRMK's +127. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
94β versus Primoris Services Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning PRIM is approximately 94% more volatile than TRMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 76% for Primoris Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 0. 7% for Valmont Industries, Inc. (VMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mueller Water Products, Inc. grew EPS 64. 9% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for Valmont Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Primoris Services Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 5. 5% for PRIM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMK leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus Trustmark Corporation's 1. 42x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for Valmont Industries, Inc. — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRIM: 48. 7% to $160. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 0. 3% for Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM).
09Is MWA or VMI or PRIM or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
94), 2. 2% yield, +127. 7% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMK: +127. 7%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MWA and VMI and PRIM and TRMK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MWA (Industrials) and VMI (Industrials) and PRIM (Industrials) and TRMK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MWA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VMI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. MWA, VMI, TRMK pay a dividend while PRIM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.