Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Financial - Capital Markets
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Financial - Capital Markets | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $93M | $339M | $589M | $123M | $5.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $63M | $164M | $0.00 | $4M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $-219M | $137M | $-90M | $-569M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | -13.3% | 61.9% | — | -41.7% |
| Operating Margin | -138.3% | -381.6% | 16.8% | — | -134.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $18M | $18M | $14M | $17M | $395M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $628M | $95M | $61M | $355M |
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaxCyte, Inc. (MXCT) | 100 | 18.3 | -81.7% |
| Bicycle Therapeutic… (BCYC) | 100 | 30.1 | -69.9% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 101.1 | +1.1% |
| PepGen Inc. (PEPG) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| CRISPR Therapeutics… (CRSP) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MXCT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BCYC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0%
- 17.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6%
- 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PEPG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 0.17
- Lower volatility, beta 0.17, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17, current ratio 11.94x
- Beta 0.17 vs BTBT's 3.37
CRSP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 272.0% 10Y total return vs BCYC's -59.3%
- +53.1% vs MXCT's -68.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs CRSP's -90.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CRSP's -138.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.17 vs BTBT's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.1% vs MXCT's -68.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs PEPG's -60.4%, ROIC 6.5% vs -73.2% |
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRSP leads 1 • MXCT leads 0 • BCYC leads 0 • PEPG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT and PEPG operate at a comparable scale, with $164M and $0 in trailing revenue. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRSP's -138.6%. On growth, CRSP holds the edge at +68.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $63M | $164M | $0 | $4M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$238M | $166M | -$90M | -$535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | -$219M | $137M | -$90M | -$569M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$36M | -$229M | -$448M | -$82M | -$401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | -13.3% | +61.9% | — | -41.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -138.3% | -3.8% | +16.8% | — | -134.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.1% | -3.4% | +17.3% | — | -138.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -109.5% | -3.6% | -65.3% | — | -97.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -91.1% | — | — | +68.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +1.1% | +2.8% | +60.3% | +19.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MXCT and PEPG and CRSP each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93M | $339M | $589M | $123M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $91M | -$272M | $508M | $80M | $5.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.08x | -1.55x | 9.15x | -0.84x | -8.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 8.49x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 4.67x | 3.60x | — | 1440.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 0.56x | 0.56x | 0.51x | 2.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-76 for PEPG. BCYC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRSP's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs CRSP's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.1% | -35.7% | +21.4% | -75.7% | -30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.6% | -29.5% | +19.0% | -60.4% | -24.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.7% | — | +6.5% | -73.2% | -22.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -22.2% | -32.0% | +8.5% | -63.4% | -26.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.03x | 0.03x | 0.12x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$611M | -$81M | -$44M | $40M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $628M | $95M | $61M | $355M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $18M | $14M | $17M | $395M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1465.53x | — | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRSP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRSP five years ago would be worth $4,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $513 for MXCT. Over the past 12 months, CRSP leads with a +53.1% total return vs MXCT's -68.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRSP at -2.2% vs PEPG's -50.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.8% | -26.8% | -10.3% | -75.0% | -2.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.2% | -37.1% | -9.0% | +42.1% | +53.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.6% | -77.4% | -19.7% | -88.1% | -6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -84.6% | -84.6% | -86.1% | -51.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -59.3% | -60.4% | -86.1% | +272.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -43.1% | -39.1% | -7.1% | -50.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PEPG and CRSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PEPG is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRSP currently trades 66.8% from its 52-week high vs PEPG's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.52x | 3.41x | -0.10x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.86 | $9.36 | $4.55 | $7.80 | $78.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $4.24 | $1.25 | $1.01 | $33.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.5% | +52.2% | +40.2% | +22.9% | +66.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.2 | 57.0 | 69.1 | 37.6 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 847K | 464K | 18.5M | 1.5M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCYC as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", PEPG as "Buy", CRSP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 291.1% upside for PEPG (target: $7) vs 20.2% for CRSP (target: $63). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.67 | $5.00 | $7.00 | $63.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 2 | 6 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.01 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRSP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MXCT vs BCYC vs BTBT vs PEPG vs CRSP: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP?
Over the past 5 years, CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP) delivered a total return of -51.
3%, compared to -94. 9% for MaxCyte, Inc. (MXCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRSP returned +289. 1% versus MXCT's -95. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 10β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 41β — meaning BTBT is approximately -3620% more volatile than PEPG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bicycle Therapeutics plc (BCYC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 21% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -90. 0% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG (CRSP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 1% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRSP leads at 100. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -165. 7% for CRISPR Therapeutics AG — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -161. 9% for CRSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCYC leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MXCT, BCYC, PEPG, CRSP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is MXCT or BCYC or BTBT or PEPG or CRSP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PepGen Inc.
(PEPG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 10)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PEPG: -86. 3%, BTBT: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MXCT and BCYC and BTBT and PEPG and CRSP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MXCT (Healthcare) and BCYC (Healthcare) and BTBT (Financial Services) and PEPG (Healthcare) and CRSP (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MXCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCYC is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; PEPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRSP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.