Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Asset Management
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $297M | $170.69B | $896.00B | $79.60B | $48.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $24.22B | $280.33B | $12.64B | $22.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $5.55B | $57.05B | $3.30B | $2.94B |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 50.5% | 60.0% | 61.9% | 61.4% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 29.1% | 25.9% | 38.7% | 16.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 19.4x | 14.4x | 17.3x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $15.00B | $942.38B | $20.28B | $29.80B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $11.47B | $343.34B | $837M | $131.36B |
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 189.7 | +89.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 263.8 | +163.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 2.4% vs STT's 0.8%
- Lower P/E (12.9x vs 13.5x)
BLK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.29, yield 2.0%
- 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs STT's 3.0%
- 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs STT's 222.0%
- PEG 0.81 vs BLK's 9.03
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.35, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.02x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
STT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +75.1% vs ICE's -20.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs STT's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 13.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs BLK's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.1% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs STT's 0.4% |
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ICE leads 1 • STT leads 1 • MYFW leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1504.4x MYFW's $186M. ICE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYFW's 7.1%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $24.2B | $280.3B | $12.6B | $22.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $8.1B | $81.4B | $6.5B | $4.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $5.6B | $57.0B | $3.3B | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $3.6B | $100.9B | $4.3B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +50.5% | +60.0% | +61.9% | +61.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +29.1% | +25.9% | +38.7% | +16.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +22.9% | +20.4% | +26.1% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.8% | +36.0% | +33.9% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | -22.7% | +16.0% | +23.1% | +23.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MYFW and JPM each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 45% valuation discount to BLK's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BLK's 13.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $170.7B | $896.0B | $79.6B | $48.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $174.2B | $1.50T | $99.0B | -$53.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 29.14x | 16.00x | 24.36x | 17.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 19.40x | 14.40x | 17.34x | 13.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.57x | 0.90x | 2.74x | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 22.60x | 18.36x | 15.34x | -12.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 7.05x | 3.20x | 6.30x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 2.77x | 2.47x | 2.77x | 1.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.53x | 8.88x | 18.56x | 11.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLK leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $5 for MYFW. BLK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs MYFW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.9% | +15.9% | +11.6% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.6% | +1.3% | +2.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.5% | +4.5% | +7.5% | +4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.6% | +8.9% | +9.5% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.24x | 2.60x | 0.70x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $3.5B | $599.0B | $19.4B | -$101.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $11.5B | $343.3B | $837M | $131.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $15.0B | $942.4B | $20.3B | $29.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 6.53x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,465 for MYFW. Over the past 12 months, STT leads with a +75.1% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STT at 34.2% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -3.8% | -0.5% | -11.8% | +31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +6.6% | +21.8% | -20.4% | +75.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +60.4% | +138.2% | +34.6% | +141.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +29.2% | +118.2% | +30.9% | +113.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +246.8% | +465.8% | +195.3% | +222.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +17.1% | +33.6% | +10.4% | +34.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ICE and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.29x | 0.94x | 0.35x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $1219.94 | $337.25 | $189.35 | $168.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $917.39 | $262.71 | $136.67 | $95.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +84.6% | +95.1% | +74.2% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 44.9 | 59.1 | 31.9 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 602K | 7.0M | 3.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
BLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", BLK as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", ICE as "Buy", STT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, BLK offers the higher dividend yield at 1.96% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $1301.63 | $339.75 | $194.00 | $161.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 33 | 61 | 36 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.0% | +1.9% | +1.4% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 15 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $20.24 | $5.95 | $1.93 | $3.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +1.7% | +2.7% |
BLK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). ICE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MYFW vs BLK vs JPM vs ICE vs STT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for State Street Corporation (STT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, First Western Financial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to +14. 6% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MYFW's +55. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning BLK is approximately 268% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 3. 0% for State Street Corporation (STT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 7. 1% for First Western Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 9. 7% for MYFW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for BlackRock, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or BLK or JPM or ICE or STT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and BLK and JPM and ICE and STT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BLK, JPM, ICE, STT pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.