Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $297M | $2.52B | $2.88B | $8.18B | $3.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $902M | $644M | $3.33B | $618M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $169M | $209M | $578M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 73.6% | 79.7% | 63.7% | 4.5% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 24.3% | 43.7% | 21.4% | -85.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 11.5x | 14.7x | 13.1x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $327M | $991M | $4.63B | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $185M | $108M | $1.66B | $380M |
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 238.5 | +138.5% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 54.0%
- Beta 0.75 vs SFNC's 0.89
- +46.7% vs CVBF's +16.3%
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs MYFW's 2.4%
CVBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 159.2% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 108.5%
- PEG 1.60 vs CVBF's 4.64
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs SFNC's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs CVBF's +16.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • MYFW leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 17.8x MYFW's $186M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $902M | $644M | $3.3B | $618M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $241M | $294M | $794M | -$444M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $169M | $209M | $578M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $225M | $217M | $1.7B | $410M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +73.6% | +79.7% | +63.7% | +4.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +24.3% | +43.7% | +21.4% | -85.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +18.8% | +32.5% | +17.4% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +24.9% | +33.7% | +51.4% | +66.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | +39.5% | +11.1% | +1.8% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 39% valuation discount to MYFW's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOKF offers better value at 1.79x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $2.5B | $2.9B | $8.2B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $2.7B | $3.8B | $11.2B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 14.47x | 13.97x | 14.66x | -7.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 11.54x | 14.74x | 13.09x | 10.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.06x | 4.40x | 1.79x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 11.03x | 13.37x | 14.05x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 2.90x | 4.48x | 2.46x | 5.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.29x | 1.26x | 1.39x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.49x | 13.26x | 14.22x | 7.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NBTB and CVBF each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BOKF delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.5% | +9.3% | +9.8% | -11.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.4% | +1.1% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.9% | +6.8% | +5.2% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +2.4% | +9.3% | +8.4% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.17x | 0.43x | 0.78x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $142M | $883M | $3.0B | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $185M | $108M | $1.7B | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $327M | $991M | $4.6B | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 1.05x | 2.12x | 0.59x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYFW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,847 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs CVBF's +16.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYFW at 18.6% vs SFNC's 11.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +17.6% | +14.8% | +14.5% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +18.3% | +16.3% | +42.7% | +23.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +48.5% | +64.4% | +60.8% | +37.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +44.4% | +15.2% | +66.5% | -11.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +108.5% | +66.9% | +159.2% | +26.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +14.1% | +18.0% | +17.2% | +11.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MYFW and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MYFW is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs BOKF's 96.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.76x | 0.81x | 0.87x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $48.27 | $21.48 | $139.73 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $39.20 | $17.95 | $91.35 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.8% | +98.8% | +96.3% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 63.1 | 60.1 | 56.4 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 266K | 1.6M | 262K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $46.00 | $24.75 | $132.00 | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | 16 | 21 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +3.0% | +3.8% | +1.8% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 13 | 0 | 21 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $1.43 | $0.82 | $2.42 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +5.1% | 0.0% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MYFW vs NBTB vs CVBF vs BOKF vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus First Western Financial, Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BOK Financial Corporation wins at 1. 60x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -11. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +159. 2% versus SFNC's +26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Western Financial, Inc.
(MYFW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning SFNC is approximately 18% more volatile than MYFW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 78% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 3. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or NBTB or CVBF or BOKF or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 0% yield, +108. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +108. 5%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and NBTB and CVBF and BOKF and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NBTB, CVBF, BOKF, SFNC pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.