Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $297M | $3.27B | $5.58B | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $618M | $1.37B | $902M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $-398M | $475M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 4.5% | 77.3% | 73.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -85.4% | 43.8% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 10.9x | 11.5x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $641M | $935M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $380M | $667M | $185M |
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 131.6 | +31.6% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 156.6 | +56.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 54.0%
- +46.7% vs HOMB's +3.0%
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.5x)
- 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 21.8%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 0.87 vs NBTB's 1.64
- NIM 3.8% vs MYFW's 2.4%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 108.5% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 57.7%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.0%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SFNC's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs HOMB's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • MYFW leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 7.4x MYFW's $186M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $618M | $1.4B | $902M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | -$444M | $618M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | -$398M | $475M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $410M | $311M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +4.5% | +77.3% | +73.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -85.4% | +43.8% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | -64.3% | +34.6% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +66.4% | +22.6% | +24.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | +42.1% | +26.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 49% valuation discount to MYFW's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs NBTB's 2.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $3.3B | $5.6B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $3.5B | $5.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | -7.63x | 11.72x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 10.90x | 11.47x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.89x | 2.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | — | 9.47x | 11.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 5.21x | 4.06x | 2.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 0.89x | 1.30x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.73x | 11.58x | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MYFW's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | -11.5% | +11.4% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | -1.6% | +2.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | -9.1% | +8.7% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | -4.2% | +11.5% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.19x | 0.22x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $261M | $268M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $380M | $667M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $641M | $935M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | -1.01x | 1.47x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYFW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $14,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,847 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYFW at 18.6% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +20.7% | +2.7% | +17.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +23.0% | +3.0% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +37.1% | +31.2% | +48.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | -11.5% | +22.1% | +44.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +26.2% | +57.7% | +108.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +11.1% | +9.5% | +14.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.89x | 0.66x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $22.62 | $30.83 | $48.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $17.00 | $25.50 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +99.5% | +91.6% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 63.7 | 63.7 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 1.1M | 1.4M | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.5% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.79% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $23.00 | $31.50 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 9 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +3.8% | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 | 15 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $0.85 | $0.80 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.4% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MYFW vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus First Western Financial, Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +44. 4%, compared to -11. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +108. 5% versus SFNC's +26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 0. 89β — meaning SFNC is approximately 35% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 41% for First Western Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for First Western Financial, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 11. 5% to $31. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +57. 7%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and SFNC and HOMB and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. SFNC, HOMB, NBTB pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.