Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $34M | $1.11B | $1.17B | $161.07B | $112.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $103M | $595M | $10.58B | $25.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-76M | $-125M | $2.98B | $3.25B |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 49.2% | 89.6% | 66.3% | 63.5% |
| Operating Margin | -34.1% | -79.5% | -9.6% | 30.5% | 22.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 27.1x | 43.8x | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $20M | $620M | $303M | $14.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $150M | $161M | $3.37B | $4.01B |
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myomo, Inc. (MYO) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
| Alphatec Holdings, … (ATEC) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Intuitive Surgical,… (ISRG) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
| Stryker Corporation (SYK) | 100 | 152.2 | +52.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 25.7% revenue growth vs SYK's 11.2%
BFLY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +94.5% vs MYO's -82.0%
ATEC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 15.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.6%
ISRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs ATEC's 225.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 4.87x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 4.87x
- 28.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
SYK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 1.1%
- PEG 1.32 vs ISRG's 2.01
- Lower P/E (19.6x vs 43.8x), PEG 1.32 vs 2.01
- Beta 0.55 vs BFLY's 3.28
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.7% revenue growth vs SYK's 11.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.6x vs 43.8x), PEG 1.32 vs 2.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.2% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs BFLY's 3.28 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 34-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs MYO's -82.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs MYO's -40.8%, ROIC 15.0% vs -86.1% |
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories
SYK leads 1 • BFLY leads 1 • MYO leads 0 • ATEC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ISRG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SYK is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.1B annually — 609.5x MYO's $41M. ISRG is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $103M | $595M | $10.6B | $25.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | -$76M | $4M | $3.8B | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$76M | -$125M | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$19M | $7M | $2.8B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +49.2% | +89.6% | +66.3% | +63.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.1% | -79.5% | -9.6% | +30.5% | +22.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.7% | -73.6% | -21.1% | +28.2% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.3% | -18.3% | +1.2% | +26.8% | +17.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +25.0% | -100.0% | +23.0% | +11.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | +16.0% | +37.1% | +18.8% | +56.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SYK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.0x trailing earnings, SYK trades at a 39% valuation discount to ISRG's 57.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYK offers better value at 2.36x vs ISRG's 2.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34M | $1.1B | $1.2B | $161.1B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $39M | $979M | $1.6B | $158.0B | $123.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.36x | -13.68x | -8.07x | 57.62x | 35.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 27.09x | 43.84x | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.65x | 2.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 3752.09x | 43.62x | 20.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 11.37x | 1.54x | 16.00x | 4.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.20x | 5.35x | 32.28x | 9.17x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 422.56x | 64.67x | 26.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ISRG delivers a 16.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-4 for ATEC. ISRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ATEC's 17.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATEC scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -114.9% | -36.8% | -4.4% | +16.9% | +15.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -40.8% | -25.6% | -15.8% | +14.8% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -86.1% | -76.8% | -12.6% | +15.0% | +11.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.2% | -39.3% | -13.7% | +16.5% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.70x | 0.10x | 17.21x | 0.02x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$130M | $459M | -$3.1B | $10.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $150M | $161M | $3.4B | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $20M | $620M | $303M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.68x | -71.59x | -3.29x | — | 6.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ISRG five years ago would be worth $15,873 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $905 for MYO. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs MYO's -82.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 26.2% vs ATEC's -19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | +13.1% | -62.7% | -19.3% | -15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.0% | +94.5% | -37.8% | -15.4% | -22.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +100.9% | -47.8% | +49.6% | +5.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.9% | -65.1% | -48.7% | +58.7% | +21.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -57.2% | +225.4% | +554.2% | +187.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | +26.2% | -19.5% | +14.4% | +1.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ISRG and SYK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SYK is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ISRG currently trades 75.1% from its 52-week high vs MYO's 17.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.63x | 3.28x | 1.13x | 1.02x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.87 | $5.72 | $23.29 | $603.88 | $404.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $1.32 | $6.85 | $427.84 | $289.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +17.9% | +74.1% | +33.3% | +75.1% | +72.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 46.2 | 26.8 | 42.4 | 24.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 320K | 6.4M | 3.0M | 1.8M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BFLY as "Buy", ATEC as "Buy", ISRG as "Buy", SYK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 222.6% upside for ATEC (target: $25) vs 27.8% for BFLY (target: $5). SYK is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 | $25.00 | $622.60 | $403.69 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 16 | 55 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
ISRG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SYK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MYO vs BFLY vs ATEC vs ISRG vs SYK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Myomo, Inc.
(MYO) is the stronger pick with 25. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 2% for Stryker Corporation (SYK). Stryker Corporation (SYK) offers the better valuation at 35. 0x trailing P/E (19. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
On trailing P/E, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the cheapest at 35.
0x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. at 57. 6x. On forward P/E, Stryker Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stryker Corporation wins at 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
Over the past 5 years, Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) delivered a total return of +58. 7%, compared to -90. 9% for Myomo, Inc. (MYO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ISRG returned +554. 2% versus MYO's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 499% more volatile than SYK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 17% for Alphatec Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Myomo, Inc.
(MYO) is pulling ahead at 25. 7% versus 11. 2% for Stryker Corporation (SYK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intuitive Surgical, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -131. 3% for Myomo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYO leads at 38. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
(ISRG) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ISRG leads at 29. 3% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATEC leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 32x versus Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 's 2. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Stryker Corporation (SYK) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 43. 8x for Intuitive Surgical, Inc. — 24. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATEC: 222. 6% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK?
In this comparison, SYK (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. MYO, BFLY, ATEC, ISRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MYO or BFLY or ATEC or ISRG or SYK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stryker Corporation (SYK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 1. 1% yield, +187. 1% 10Y return). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYK: +187. 1%, BFLY: -57. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYO and BFLY and ATEC and ISRG and SYK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ATEC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ISRG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SYK pays a dividend while MYO, BFLY, ATEC, ISRG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.