Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $84M | $1.24B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.94B | $1.51B | $1.45B | $3.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $176M | $-544M | $91M | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 24.2% | 20.0% | 34.0% | 27.1% |
| Operating Margin | 11.5% | -31.8% | 14.4% | 10.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.7x | — | 7.5x | 6.9x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $779M | $304M | $2.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $161M | $54M | $98M | $325M |
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Marzetti Company (MZTI) | 100 | 76.2 | -23.8% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 47.8 | -52.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MZTI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 2.38x
- 9.1% margin vs HAIN's -36.1%
- 3.2% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- -24.3% vs SMPL's -64.8%
HAIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- PEG 0.31 vs MZTI's 4.09
- 9.0% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
NOMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.1%
- 40.1% 10Y total return vs MZTI's 19.9%
- Beta 0.07, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.07x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.1% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -24.3% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 19.3% vs -23.7% |
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAIN leads in 1 of 6 categories
MZTI leads 1 • NOMD leads 1 • SMPL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MZTI and SMPL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NOMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 2.1x SMPL's $1.4B. MZTI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.5B | $1.4B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292M | -$430M | $231M | $435M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $176M | -$544M | $91M | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $248M | $5M | $174M | $252M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.2% | +20.0% | +34.0% | +27.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -31.8% | +14.4% | +10.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -36.1% | +6.3% | +4.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +0.3% | +12.0% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.0% | -6.7% | -0.3% | -2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.4% | -11.3% | -31.6% | -123.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 51% valuation discount to MZTI's 19.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs MZTI's 4.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $84M | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $808M | $1.4B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.27x | -0.13x | 12.20x | 9.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.68x | — | 7.45x | 6.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.72x | — | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.98x | — | 5.97x | 7.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 0.05x | 0.86x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.22x | 0.14x | 0.70x | 0.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.76x | — | 7.86x | 4.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MZTI leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MZTI delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. MZTI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAIN's 1.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MZTI scores 5/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | -164.7% | +5.2% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.5% | -36.8% | +3.7% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.3% | -23.7% | +8.1% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +20.9% | -29.2% | +9.4% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 1.64x | 0.17x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$106M | $725M | $206M | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $161M | $54M | $98M | $325M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $779M | $304M | $2.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.60x | 6.77x | 2.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NOMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MZTI five years ago would be worth $7,114 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, MZTI leads with a -24.3% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NOMD at -15.8% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.3% | -29.8% | -36.4% | -15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | -49.2% | -64.8% | -43.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.3% | -95.8% | -67.8% | -40.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.9% | -98.2% | -64.3% | -59.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -98.5% | +3.7% | +40.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.3% | -65.3% | -31.5% | -15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MZTI and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NOMD is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MZTI currently trades 61.2% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.32x | 2.12x | 0.38x | 0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $190.96 | $2.22 | $36.92 | $19.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $111.04 | $0.55 | $10.21 | $9.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.2% | +33.2% | +33.7% | +51.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.8 | 47.8 | 42.9 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 300K | 1.2M | 2.8M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MZTI and NOMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MZTI as "Hold", HAIN as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 33.4% for NOMD (target: $14). For income investors, NOMD offers the higher dividend yield at 7.06% vs MZTI's 3.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $160.00 | $1.17 | $20.17 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 44 | 24 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | — | +7.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.77 | — | — | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +1.7% | +4.1% | +16.5% |
HAIN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). MZTI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
MZTI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus The Marzetti Company at 19. 3x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus The Marzetti Company's 4. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
Over the past 5 years, The Marzetti Company (MZTI) delivered a total return of -28.
9%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOMD returned +40. 1% versus HAIN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 2870% more volatile than NOMD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Marzetti Company (MZTI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 164% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Marzetti Company grew EPS 5. 4% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
The Marzetti Company (MZTI) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
8% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus The Marzetti Company's 4. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for The Marzetti Company — 9. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD?
In this comparison, NOMD (7.
1% yield), MZTI (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. HAIN, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MZTI or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 7. 1% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NOMD: +40. 1%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MZTI and HAIN and SMPL and NOMD?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MZTI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. MZTI, NOMD pay a dividend while HAIN, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.