Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Grocery Stores
Medical - Equipment & Services
Specialty Retail
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Leisure | Grocery Stores | Medical - Equipment & Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $25M | $3.66B | $7.79B | $7.30B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $131M | $1.38B | $8.90B | $2.35B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $229M | $507M | $128M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 8.5% | 54.2% | 37.0% | 69.7% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 29.6% | 7.6% | 4.6% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.0x | 14.9x | 58.3x | 44.8x |
| Total Debt | $59M | $443M | $1.94B | $1.12B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $346M | $257M | $229M | $10.73B |
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Alternative… (NAII) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
| Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 329.6 | +229.6% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 284.6 | +184.6% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 315.3 | +215.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NAII doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PLNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 44.8x)
- 16.5% margin vs NAII's -14.6%
SFM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.88 vs WMT's 4.07
- 12.5% ROA vs NAII's -12.5%, ROIC 17.8% vs -5.3%
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 0.7%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs SFM's 210.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.11, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.11, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 44.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs NAII's -14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs HIMS's 2.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs PLNT's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.1% vs PLNT's -52.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NAII's -12.5%, ROIC 17.8% vs -5.3% |
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
PLNT leads 1 • NAII leads 1 • SFM leads 1 • HIMS leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLNT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 5354.9x NAII's $131M. PLNT is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAII's -14.6%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $131M | $1.4B | $8.9B | $2.3B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $568M | $996M | $164M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $229M | $507M | $128M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $267M | $361M | $73M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +54.2% | +37.0% | +69.7% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +29.6% | +7.6% | +4.6% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | +16.5% | +5.7% | +5.5% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +19.3% | +4.1% | +3.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +21.9% | +4.1% | +28.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | +30.0% | -5.5% | -27.3% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NAII leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, SFM trades at a 72% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SFM offers better value at 0.92x vs WMT's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $3.7B | $7.8B | $7.3B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $3.8B | $9.5B | $8.2B | $1.10T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.17x | 17.51x | 15.60x | 55.43x | 47.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.03x | 14.85x | 58.29x | 44.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | — | 4.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.82x | 9.52x | 46.50x | 24.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 2.76x | 0.88x | 3.11x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | — | 5.83x | 13.50x | 10.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.95x | 14.36x | 16.65x | 98.70x | 25.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-29 for NAII. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLNT scores 9/9 vs HIMS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | — | +36.1% | +23.7% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +7.4% | +12.5% | +6.0% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.3% | +35.2% | +17.8% | +10.7% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +14.2% | +22.1% | +10.9% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | — | 1.39x | 2.07x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $97M | $1.7B | $892M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $346M | $257M | $229M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $59M | $443M | $1.9B | $1.1B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.34x | 6.73x | 254.65x | — | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $30,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,880 for NAII. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +35.1% total return vs PLNT's -52.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.7% vs NAII's -29.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.6% | -58.2% | +2.7% | -15.4% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.8% | -52.7% | -47.6% | -45.0% | +35.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.5% | -36.3% | +130.9% | +138.6% | +161.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.2% | -41.4% | +207.7% | +173.9% | +186.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +215.8% | +210.8% | +188.5% | +501.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.9% | -14.0% | +32.2% | +33.6% | +37.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs PLNT's 40.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.41x | 0.16x | 2.48x | 0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.96 | $114.47 | $182.00 | $70.43 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.33 | $37.03 | $64.75 | $13.74 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.8% | +40.1% | +45.5% | +40.1% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 14.9 | 60.4 | 50.2 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 1.9M | 2.2M | 34.8M | 17.1M |
Analyst Outlook
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLNT as "Buy", SFM as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 72.5% upside for PLNT (target: $79) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.15 | $91.00 | $26.20 | $137.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 43 | 19 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +13.7% | +6.1% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). PLNT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
NAII vs PLNT vs SFM vs HIMS vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Planet Fitness, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +207. 7%, compared to -81. 2% for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. (NAII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +501. 4% versus NAII's -76. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 11β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 2210% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -85. 4% for Natural Alternatives International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
Planet Fitness, Inc.
(PLNT) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 5% net margin versus -10. 5% for Natural Alternatives International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLNT leads at 29. 8% versus -6. 7% for NAII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLNT leads at 82. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 44. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLNT: 72. 5% to $79. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. NAII, PLNT, SFM, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAII or PLNT or SFM or HIMS or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 11), 0. 7% yield, +501. 4% 10Y return). Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (HIMS) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +501. 4%, HIMS: +188. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAII and PLNT and SFM and HIMS and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAII (Consumer Defensive) and PLNT (Consumer Cyclical) and SFM (Consumer Defensive) and HIMS (Healthcare) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLNT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while NAII, PLNT, SFM, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.