Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAMI
Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$11M
5Y Perf.-90.5%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-87.5%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.73B
5Y Perf.-6.3%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-22.6%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+52.0%

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAMI logoNAMI
AIXI logoAIXI
BBAI logoBBAI
CLPS logoCLPS
CODA logoCODA
IndustryInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$11M$8M$19.73B$25M$134M
Revenue (TTM)$406M$115M$127M$299M$28M
Net Income (TTM)$20M$-53M$-289M$-4M$4M
Gross Margin28.8%64.3%25.8%22.8%66.3%
Operating Margin6.7%-44.2%-68.3%-1.4%17.4%
Forward P/E3.6x22.5x
Total Debt$6M$46M$24M$34M$395K
Cash & Equiv.$93M$847K$87M$28M$29M

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAMI
AIXI
BBAI
CLPS
CODA
StockDec 24May 26Return
Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI)1009.5-90.5%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)10012.5-87.5%
BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI)10093.7-6.3%
CLPS Incorporation (CLPS)10077.4-22.6%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100152.0+52.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CODA leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and operational efficiency and capital deployment. CLPS also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NAMI
Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares
The Defensive Pick

NAMI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.17x
  • Beta 0.73, current ratio 2.17x
  • Lower P/E (3.6x vs 22.5x)
  • 9.7% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Growth Play

AIXI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
Best for: growth exposure
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick

CLPS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs BBAI's 3.31
  • 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
  • 30.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
  • 14.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
  • +78.9% vs NAMI's -86.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCODA logoCODA30.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
ValueNAMI logoNAMILower P/E (3.6x vs 22.5x)
Quality / MarginsCODA logoCODA14.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
Stability / SafetyCLPS logoCLPSBeta 0.27 vs BBAI's 3.31
DividendsCLPS logoCLPS14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs NAMI's -86.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NAMI logoNAMI9.7% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAMIJinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares
FY 2024
Service, Other
100.0%$16M
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M
BBAIBigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$158M
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
FY 2025
Other Member
100.0%$894,598
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCODALAGGINGBBAI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

NAMI is the larger business by revenue, generating $406M annually — 14.5x CODA's $28M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$406M$115M$127M$299M$28M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$49M-$75M-$1M$6M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$53M-$289M-$4M$4M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M-$56M$0$7M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.8%+64.3%+25.8%+22.8%+66.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.7%-44.2%-68.3%-1.4%+17.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%-45.9%-2.3%-1.3%+14.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.8%-2.0%-44.3%-2.3%+24.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.7%-64.9%-0.9%+15.3%+28.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-114.7%-29.9%+52.0%+75.8%+3.0%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NAMI and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 3.6x trailing earnings, NAMI trades at a 89% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Market CapShares × price$11M$8M$19.7B$25M$134M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$2M$53M$19.7B$31M$106M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS3.60x-0.45x-5.09x-3.48x32.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple-0.21x17.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.19x0.11x154.51x0.15x5.05x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.46x24.45x0.43x2.30x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x
Evenly matched — NAMI and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — NAMI and CODA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

NAMI delivers a 94.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $95 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+94.8%-50.7%-6.1%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.7%-65.3%-35.3%-3.2%+6.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-34.4%-19.5%-7.9%+11.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.4%-3.4%-19.6%-9.8%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944427
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.04x0.59x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$87M$45M-$63M$6M-$28M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$93M$846,593$87M$28M$29M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$46M$24M$34M$394,932
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-14.13x-18.17x
Evenly matched — NAMI and CODA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs NAMI's -86.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.3% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-49.2%+68.1%-28.6%-10.3%+25.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-86.9%-79.2%+36.7%-5.4%+78.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-98.6%+49.5%+0.5%+34.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-98.6%-56.9%-69.3%+49.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-98.6%-57.6%-78.5%+844.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-55.7%-75.9%+14.3%+0.2%+10.4%
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs NAMI's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.73x0.94x3.31x0.27x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.98$4.02$9.39$1.88$17.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.37$0.08$2.96$0.80$5.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+9.7%+18.0%+44.4%+48.2%+68.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.149.363.349.848.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K60.6M34.6M15K256K
Evenly matched — CLPS and CODA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: BBAI as "Hold", CODA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNAMI logoNAMIJinxin Technology…AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…CLPS logoCLPSCLPS IncorporationCODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$14.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts41
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises230
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallCoda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAMI vs AIXI vs BBAI vs CLPS vs CODA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

On trailing P/E, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the cheapest at 3.

6x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus AIXI's -98. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 1120% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.

9% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA?

In this comparison, CLPS (14.

6% yield) pays a dividend. NAMI, AIXI, BBAI, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAMI or AIXI or BBAI or CLPS or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

27), 14. 6% yield). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAMI and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS and CODA?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAMI (Communication Services) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAMI is a small-cap deep-value stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while NAMI, AIXI, BBAI, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NAMI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BBAI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLPS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NAMI and AIXI and BBAI and CLPS and CODA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NAMI: -0.7% · AIXI: -64.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.