Restaurants
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Restaurants
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $952M | $2.79B | $81M | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $1.49B | $1.21B | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $41M | $-23M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 7.5% | 26.8% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 4.3% | 0.2% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 50.2x | — | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $902M | $514M | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $360M | $20M | $135M |
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
| Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Red Robin Gourmet B… (RRGB) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
- Lower P/E (17.3x vs 50.2x)
SHAK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1%
RRGB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +34.9% vs SHAK's -32.1%
TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs NATH's 163.6%
- PEG 1.17 vs NATH's 1.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.4% revenue growth vs RRGB's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 50.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs RRGB's -1.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs RRGB's 2.10 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.9% vs SHAK's -32.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs RRGB's -4.1%, ROIC 227.7% vs 0.5% |
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NATH leads in 3 of 6 categories
RRGB leads 1 • TXRH leads 1 • SHAK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 38.4x NATH's $158M. NATH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RRGB's -1.9%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $173M | $54M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $41M | -$23M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $16M | $6M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +7.5% | +26.8% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +4.3% | +0.2% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +2.8% | -1.9% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +1.1% | +0.5% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +14.3% | -5.7% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.8% | -110.0% | +77.4% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RRGB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, NATH trades at a 73% valuation discount to SHAK's 63.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs NATH's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $952M | $2.8B | $81M | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $3.3B | $575M | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.29x | 63.53x | -2.80x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 50.21x | — | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | — | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.18x | 17.31x | 10.66x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.43x | 1.93x | 0.07x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.23x | — | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.07x | 49.34x | 13.00x | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHAK. TXRH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHAK's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.6% | — | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | +2.2% | -4.1% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +6.0% | +0.5% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +104.3% | +5.4% | +0.7% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.63x | — | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $542M | $494M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $360M | $20M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $902M | $514M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.11x | 16.87x | 0.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATH five years ago would be worth $17,213 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,032 for RRGB. Over the past 12 months, RRGB leads with a +34.9% total return vs SHAK's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs RRGB's -33.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | -17.0% | -11.4% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | -32.1% | +34.9% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.5% | +3.5% | -70.5% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.1% | -22.6% | -89.7% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.6% | +98.2% | -94.4% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +1.1% | -33.4% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NATH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RRGB's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATH currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs RRGB's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.75x | 2.10x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.50 | $144.65 | $7.89 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.67 | $67.20 | $2.46 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +47.9% | +46.5% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 48.0 | 51.6 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 1.5M | 384K | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHAK as "Hold", RRGB as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 90.7% upside for RRGB (target: $7) vs 21.3% for TXRH (target: $192). For income investors, NATH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $120.89 | $7.00 | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 | 38 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | — | — | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
NATH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RRGB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NATH vs SHAK vs RRGB vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) a "Hold" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Shake Shack Inc. at 63. 5x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) delivered a total return of +72. 1%, compared to -89. 7% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus RRGB's -94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning RRGB is approximately 304% more volatile than NATH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 163% for Shake Shack Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.
(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -3. 1% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -1. 9% for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus 0. 2% for RRGB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RRGB leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 50. 2x for Shake Shack Inc. — 25. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RRGB: 90. 7% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH?
In this comparison, NATH (2.
0% yield), TXRH (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SHAK, RRGB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NATH or SHAK or RRGB or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 0% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc. (RRGB) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NATH: +163. 6%, RRGB: -94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NATH and SHAK and RRGB and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; RRGB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NATH, TXRH pay a dividend while SHAK, RRGB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.