Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $3.26B | $2.77B | $11.81B | $12.43B | $364.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.38B | $861M | $1.37B | $2.69B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $174M | $96M | $-55M | $267M | $11.08B |
| Gross Margin | 24.1% | 79.2% | 55.7% | 87.1% | 64.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 12.8% | 8.2% | 8.0% | 23.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 15.9x | 55.2x | 25.1x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $225M | $76M | $692M | $1.48B | $29.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $456M | $457M | $424M | $770M | $9.47B |
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCR Atleos Corporat… (NATL) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 174.4 | +74.4% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 507.0 | +407.0% |
| Nutanix, Inc. (NTNX) | 100 | 96.3 | -3.7% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) | 100 | 182.4 | +82.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 22.2x)
NTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 4.9%, current ratio 1.75x
VIAV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 301.7%
- +466.6% vs NTNX's -37.7%
NTNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 227.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- Beta 0.81, current ratio 1.72x
- 18.1% revenue growth vs NTCT's -0.8%
- Beta 0.81 vs VIAV's 1.54
CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
- 18.8% margin vs VIAV's -4.0%
- 1.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 9.0% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs NTCT's -0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.8% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs VIAV's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +466.6% vs NTNX's -37.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.5% |
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories
VIAV leads 1 • CSCO leads 1 • NATL leads 0 • NTNX leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NTNX and CSCO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 68.6x NTCT's $861M. CSCO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, VIAV holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.4B | $861M | $1.4B | $2.7B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $357M | $171M | $207M | $288M | $16.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $174M | $96M | -$55M | $267M | $11.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $82M | $275M | $46M | $777M | $12.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +79.2% | +55.7% | +87.1% | +64.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +12.8% | +8.2% | +8.0% | +23.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +11.1% | -4.0% | +9.9% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +32.0% | +3.3% | +28.9% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | -0.5% | +42.8% | +10.4% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.1% | +11.9% | -70.2% | +89.5% | +29.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NATL and NTCT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.7x trailing earnings, NATL trades at a 94% valuation discount to VIAV's 340.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NATL's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIAV's 90.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.3B | $2.8B | $11.8B | $12.4B | $365.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $2.4B | $12.1B | $13.1B | $385.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.68x | -7.57x | 340.33x | 70.66x | 36.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.14x | 15.87x | 55.18x | 25.15x | 22.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 74.57x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.02x | — | 90.43x | 53.61x | 26.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 3.36x | 10.89x | 4.90x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.32x | 1.78x | 14.77x | — | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.66x | 13.11x | 190.52x | 16.57x | 27.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NATL delivers a 47.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIAV's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs VIAV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +47.0% | +6.1% | -6.9% | — | +23.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | +4.3% | -2.3% | +8.2% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +23.4% | -19.3% | +5.5% | +6.9% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | -18.5% | +4.9% | +12.5% | +13.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.56x | 0.05x | 0.89x | — | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231M | -$381M | $269M | $713M | $20.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $456M | $457M | $424M | $770M | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $225M | $76M | $692M | $1.5B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.62x | 55.89x | 2.70x | 12.48x | 9.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIAV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIAV five years ago would be worth $31,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,293 for NTCT. Over the past 12 months, VIAV leads with a +466.6% total return vs NTNX's -37.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIAV at 77.7% vs NTCT's 9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.9% | +42.6% | +181.3% | -9.2% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.3% | +80.5% | +466.6% | -37.7% | +57.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | +30.3% | +461.0% | +87.2% | +109.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.8% | +42.9% | +212.0% | +60.5% | +87.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.0% | +66.6% | +715.5% | +24.1% | +301.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.5% | +9.2% | +77.7% | +23.3% | +27.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTCT and NTNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTNX is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIAV's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTCT currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs NTNX's 55.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 1.12x | 1.54x | 0.81x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.50 | $39.24 | $60.43 | $83.36 | $94.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.56 | $19.98 | $8.87 | $34.01 | $59.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +97.6% | +84.5% | +55.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 68.6 | 66.7 | 59.6 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 552K | 6.3M | 4.1M | 18.9M |
Analyst Outlook
CSCO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NATL as "Hold", NTCT as "Hold", VIAV as "Buy", NTNX as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.8% upside for NTNX (target: $60) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32). CSCO is the only dividend payer here at 1.75% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.40 | $29.00 | $32.25 | $59.64 | $96.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 21 | 19 | 31 | 73 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.1% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
NTCT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). VIAV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NATL vs NTCT vs VIAV vs NTNX vs CSCO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the stronger pick with 18. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) offers the better valuation at 20. 7x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
On trailing P/E, NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) is the cheapest at 20.
7x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. at 340. 3x. On forward P/E, NCR Atleos Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
Over the past 5 years, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) delivered a total return of +212. 0%, compared to +42. 9% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIAV returned +715. 5% versus NTNX's +24. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning VIAV is approximately 90% more volatile than NTNX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 89% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nutanix, Inc.
(NTNX) is pulling ahead at 18. 1% versus -0. 8% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nutanix, Inc. grew EPS 227. 5% year-over-year, compared to -144. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTNX leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 0% net margin versus -44. 6% for NetScout Systems, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSCO leads at 20. 8% versus -44. 7% for NTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTNX leads at 86. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL) trades at 9.
1x forward P/E versus 55. 2x for Viavi Solutions Inc. — 46. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTNX: 29. 8% to $59. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO?
In this comparison, CSCO (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. NATL, NTCT, VIAV, NTNX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NATL or NTCT or VIAV or NTNX or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.
(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +301. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +301. 7%, NATL: +99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NATL and NTCT and VIAV and NTNX and CSCO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NTNX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. CSCO pays a dividend while NATL, NTCT, VIAV, NTNX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.