Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Internet Content & Information
Travel Services
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Travel Services | Internet Content & Information | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $4.32B | $625M | $209M | $3.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $537M | $2.83B | $548M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-181M | $497M | $11M | $57M |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 50.2% | 96.8% | 73.4% |
| Operating Margin | -20.1% | 13.4% | 0.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.2x | 50.6x | 63.2x |
| Total Debt | $672M | $4.45B | $36M | $237M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $306M | $792M | $131M | $509M |
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sabre Corporation (SABR) | 100 | 22.9 | -77.1% |
| trivago N.V. (TRVG) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) | 100 | 279.5 | +179.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 33.5%, EPS growth 45.5%
- 33.5% revenue growth vs SABR's -8.5%
- +12.2% vs MMYT's -58.8%
SABR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (1.2x vs 50.6x)
- 17.6% margin vs NAVN's -33.7%
- 11.3% ROA vs NAVN's -16.8%, ROIC 9.7% vs -16.0%
TRVG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 17.0%, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.67 vs SABR's 1.93
MMYT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 150.4% 10Y total return vs NAVN's 12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.5% revenue growth vs SABR's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 50.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs NAVN's -33.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SABR's 1.93 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.2% vs MMYT's -58.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.3% ROA vs NAVN's -16.8%, ROIC 9.7% vs -16.0% |
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRVG leads in 2 of 6 categories
MMYT leads 1 • NAVN leads 0 • SABR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SABR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 5.3x NAVN's $537M. SABR is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVN's -33.7%. On growth, TRVG holds the edge at +25.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $537M | $2.8B | $548M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $483M | $7M | $175M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $497M | $11M | $57M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$271M | $3M | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +50.2% | +96.8% | +73.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.1% | +13.4% | +0.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.7% | +17.6% | +2.0% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.6% | -9.6% | +0.6% | +21.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.1% | +25.4% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -77.3% | +191.7% | -68.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SABR and TRVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.2x trailing earnings, SABR trades at a 98% valuation discount to MMYT's 52.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SABR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MMYT's 24.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $625M | $209M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $4.3B | $98M | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.37x | 1.18x | 16.85x | 52.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 50.60x | 63.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.39x | 14.76x | 24.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.05x | 0.23x | 0.32x | 3.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 40.25x | — | 0.85x | 4.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 55.38x | 22.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SABR and TRVG and MMYT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MMYT delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-109 for NAVN. TRVG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVN's 5.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMYT scores 6/9 vs TRVG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -108.6% | — | +5.6% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | +11.3% | +3.4% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.0% | +9.7% | +1.0% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.2% | +10.3% | +0.6% | +9.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.89x | — | 0.17x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $367M | $3.7B | -$95M | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $306M | $792M | $131M | $509M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $672M | $4.5B | $36M | $237M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.42x | 1.54x | 183.34x | 1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MMYT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MMYT five years ago would be worth $17,560 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,410 for SABR. Over the past 12 months, NAVN leads with a +12.2% total return vs MMYT's -58.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MMYT at 17.6% vs SABR's -23.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | +18.8% | +5.3% | -47.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.2% | -47.2% | -36.8% | -58.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | -54.6% | -5.1% | +62.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | -75.9% | -68.6% | +75.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | -81.0% | -90.2% | +150.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.9% | -23.1% | -1.7% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NAVN and TRVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SABR's 1.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NAVN currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs MMYT's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.93x | 0.67x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.39 | $3.52 | $5.00 | $110.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.12 | $0.81 | $2.60 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +44.9% | +59.2% | +39.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 47.0 | 50.5 | 41.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 6.5M | 49K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
TRVG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NAVN as "Buy", SABR as "Buy", TRVG as "Hold", MMYT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.4% upside for MMYT (target: $91) vs 14.9% for TRVG (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $2.00 | $3.40 | $91.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 23 | 19 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.6% |
TRVG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). MMYT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NAVN vs SABR vs TRVG vs MMYT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navan, Inc.
(NAVN) is the stronger pick with 33. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Sabre Corporation (SABR) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Navan, Inc. (NAVN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
On trailing P/E, Sabre Corporation (SABR) is the cheapest at 1.
2x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 52. 1x. On forward P/E, trivago N. V. is actually cheaper at 50. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +75.
6%, compared to -75. 9% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +150. 7% versus TRVG's -90. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), trivago N.
V. (TRVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Sabre Corporation's 1. 93β — meaning SABR is approximately 190% more volatile than TRVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, trivago N. V. (TRVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 6% for Navan, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navan, Inc.
(NAVN) is pulling ahead at 33. 5% versus -8. 5% for Sabre Corporation (SABR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sabre Corporation grew EPS 283. 6% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
Sabre Corporation (SABR) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -33. 7% for Navan, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SABR leads at 12. 7% versus -20. 1% for NAVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRVG leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, trivago N.
V. (TRVG) trades at 50. 6x forward P/E versus 63. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 110. 4% to $91. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NAVN or SABR or TRVG or MMYT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, trivago N.
V. (TRVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67)). Sabre Corporation (SABR) carries a higher beta of 1. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRVG: -90. 2%, SABR: -81. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAVN and SABR and TRVG and MMYT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAVN (Technology) and SABR (Consumer Cyclical) and TRVG (Communication Services) and MMYT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAVN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SABR is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 12%
- Gross Margin > 58%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.