Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Aerospace & Defense
Computer Hardware
Electrical Equipment & Parts
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology | Aerospace & Defense | Computer Hardware | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $40.55B | $4.13B | $129K | $178.49B | $130.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $534M | $251M | $95M | $9.71B | $10.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $102M | $49M | $-37M | $3.72B | $1.56B |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 85.9% | 20.0% | 63.5% | 36.2% |
| Operating Margin | -113.3% | 7.0% | -41.9% | 42.8% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1679.7x | 23.6x | — | 40.0x | 53.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.89B | $7M | $120M | $0.00 | $3.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.68B | $72M | $5M | $1.96B | $1.73B |
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) | 100 | 864.2 | +764.2% |
| Ligand Pharmaceutic… (LGND) | 100 | 199.0 | +99.0% |
| Hyperscale Data, In… (GPUS) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Arista Networks, In… (ANET) | 100 | 146.7 | +46.7% |
| Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) | 100 | 311.2 | +211.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 350.9%, EPS growth 104.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 239.8%
- 350.9% revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8%
- +5.7% vs GPUS's -98.1%
LGND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 8.93x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 8.93x
- Lower P/E (23.6x vs 53.0x)
- Beta 0.99 vs NBIS's 3.07, lower leverage
GPUS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.34, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs VRT's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
ANET ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 38.3% margin vs GPUS's -38.8%
- 19.7% ROA vs GPUS's -15.1%, ROIC 32.8% vs -36.9%
VRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 33.6% 10Y total return vs ANET's 33.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 350.9% revenue growth vs GPUS's -31.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.6x vs 53.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.3% margin vs GPUS's -38.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs NBIS's 3.07, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs VRT's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.7% vs GPUS's -98.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs GPUS's -15.1%, ROIC 32.8% vs -36.9% |
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANET leads in 2 of 6 categories
VRT leads 1 • GPUS leads 1 • NBIS leads 0 • LGND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANET leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 114.6x GPUS's $95M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPUS's -38.8%. On growth, NBIS holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $534M | $251M | $95M | $9.7B | $10.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$287M | $52M | -$18M | $4.2B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $102M | $49M | -$37M | $3.7B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.3B | $31M | -$40M | $5.3B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +85.9% | +20.0% | +63.5% | +36.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -113.3% | +7.0% | -41.9% | +42.8% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +19.3% | -38.8% | +38.3% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +12.2% | -42.1% | +54.4% | +21.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.0% | +122.8% | -21.7% | +35.1% | +30.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.3% | +15.6% | +98.4% | +25.0% | +135.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGND and GPUS and ANET each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.5x trailing earnings, ANET trades at a 97% valuation discount to NBIS's 1679.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANET's 44.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LGND's 322.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40.6B | $4.1B | $128,863 | $178.5B | $130.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41.8B | $4.1B | $116M | $176.5B | $132.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1679.73x | -956.05x | -0.00x | 51.55x | 99.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.65x | — | 40.02x | 52.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.27x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 322.10x | — | 44.93x | 59.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 76.54x | 24.74x | 0.00x | 19.82x | 12.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.13x | 4.63x | 0.06x | 14.62x | 33.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.41x | — | 41.97x | 68.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANET leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VRT delivers a 42.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-64 for GPUS. LGND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GPUS's 57.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBIS scores 7/9 vs GPUS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +5.1% | -63.6% | +30.6% | +42.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +3.3% | -15.1% | +19.7% | +13.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.4% | -2.3% | -36.9% | +32.8% | +28.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.4% | -2.7% | -114.4% | +30.4% | +27.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.01x | 57.56x | — | 0.86x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$65M | $116M | -$2.0B | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.7B | $72M | $5M | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $7M | $120M | $0 | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -30.21x | 22.69x | -1.75x | — | 32.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VRT five years ago would be worth $147,982 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for GPUS. Over the past 12 months, NBIS leads with a +573.1% total return vs GPUS's -98.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VRT at 182.6% vs GPUS's -98.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +105.4% | +10.6% | -55.9% | +6.1% | +93.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +573.1% | +99.1% | -98.1% | +64.0% | +256.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +823.9% | +171.6% | -100.0% | +310.6% | +2157.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +823.9% | +61.0% | -100.0% | +590.5% | +1379.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +823.8% | +73.0% | -100.0% | +3374.3% | +3357.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +109.8% | +39.5% | -98.0% | +60.1% | +182.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGND and VRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGND is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBIS's 3.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VRT currently trades 94.6% from its 52-week high vs GPUS's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.07x | 0.99x | 2.34x | 2.15x | 2.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $197.89 | $247.38 | $9.98 | $179.80 | $359.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $26.26 | $98.89 | $0.12 | $82.80 | $91.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +85.0% | +1.2% | +78.8% | +94.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 59.3 | 40.9 | 41.4 | 73.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.7M | 226K | 27.9M | 7.3M | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
GPUS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBIS as "Buy", LGND as "Buy", ANET as "Buy", VRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for ANET (target: $186) vs -8.7% for NBIS (target: $169). GPUS is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $168.67 | $267.75 | — | $186.25 | $327.82 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 17 | — | 51 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +100.0% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 3 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $4.87 | — | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
ANET leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VRT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NBIS vs LGND vs GPUS vs ANET vs VRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) is the stronger pick with 350. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) offers the better valuation at 51. 5x trailing P/E (40. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nebius Group N. V. (NBIS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
On trailing P/E, Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the cheapest at 51. 5x versus Nebius Group N. V. at 1679. 7x. On forward P/E, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated is actually cheaper at 23. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
Over the past 5 years, Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) delivered a total return of +1380%, compared to -100.
0% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +33. 7% versus GPUS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Nebius Group N. V. 's 3. 07β — meaning NBIS is approximately 210% more volatile than LGND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 58% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nebius Group N.
V. (NBIS) is pulling ahead at 350. 9% versus -31. 8% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. (GPUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vertiv Holdings Co grew EPS 166. 4% year-over-year, compared to -107. 5% for Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NBIS leads at 239. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
Arista Networks, Inc.
(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -52. 7% for Hyperscale Data, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus -112. 5% for NBIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGND leads at 93. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) trades at 23.
6x forward P/E versus 53. 0x for Vertiv Holdings Co — 29. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANET: 31. 4% to $186. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT?
In this comparison, GPUS (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. NBIS, LGND, ANET, VRT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NBIS or LGND or GPUS or ANET or VRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ligand Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (LGND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
99)). Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGND: +73. 0%, VRT: +33. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBIS and LGND and GPUS and ANET and VRT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NBIS (Communication Services) and LGND (Healthcare) and GPUS (Industrials) and ANET (Technology) and VRT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NBIS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LGND is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPUS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VRT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GPUS pays a dividend while NBIS, LGND, ANET, VRT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 250%
- Net Margin > 11%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.