Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $416M | $2.50B | $6.91B | $9.63B | $2.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $236M | $51M | $-92K | $416M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-369M | $-315M | $-327M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.7% | 33.2% | — | 90.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -168.6% | -7.0% | — | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 77.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $99M | $82M | $110K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $68M | $222M | $357M | $357M | $43M |
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NovaBridge Bioscien… (NBP) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 113.7 | +13.7% |
| Kymera Therapeutics… (KYMR) | 100 | 235.1 | +135.1% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 20.90x
- 25.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1%
Among these 5 stocks, RCUS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KYMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.15
- 154.4% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
- Beta 1.15, current ratio 10.47x
- Beta 1.15 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs ARQT's +50.8%
ARQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- -0.6% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC -5.2% vs -65.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.7% margin vs KYMR's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs RCUS's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs ARQT's +50.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.6% ROA vs PRAX's -40.2%, ROIC -5.2% vs -65.0% |
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRAX leads 1 • NBP leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • KYMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARQT and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $416M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. ARQT is the more profitable business, keeping -0.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KYMR's -6.1%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $236M | $51M | -$92,000 | $416M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$391M | -$352M | -$357M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$369M | -$315M | -$327M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$489M | -$244M | -$283M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.7% | +33.2% | — | +90.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -168.6% | -7.0% | — | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -156.4% | -6.1% | — | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | -4.7% | — | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -39.3% | +55.5% | — | +60.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +73.0% | +10.5% | +13.4% | +2.7% | +55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $416M | $2.5B | $6.9B | $9.6B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $407M | $2.4B | $6.6B | $9.3B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.39x | -7.54x | -22.93x | -24.72x | -158.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 77.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.11x | 176.26x | — | 6.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.10x | 4.22x | 4.52x | 8.54x | 13.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARQT delivers a -1.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBP scores 5/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | -69.0% | -25.0% | -43.0% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.8% | -35.3% | -22.3% | -40.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -64.1% | -24.9% | -65.0% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.2% | -42.1% | -27.2% | -49.3% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.16x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | -$123M | -$275M | -$357M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $68M | $222M | $357M | $357M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $99M | $82M | $110,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -13.38x | -2119.53x | — | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KYMR five years ago would be worth $19,212 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $374 for NBP. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs ARQT's +50.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs NBP's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -48.0% | +6.5% | +16.3% | +16.4% | -28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +149.4% | +209.6% | +190.7% | +775.0% | +50.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.5% | +24.9% | +205.1% | +1976.5% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -18.6% | +92.1% | -20.8% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | +45.9% | +154.4% | -20.1% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.7% | +7.7% | +45.0% | +174.9% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KYMR and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KYMR is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs NBP's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.95x | 1.15x | 1.55x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.79 | $28.72 | $103.00 | $356.00 | $31.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.83 | $7.06 | $28.06 | $35.18 | $12.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.7% | +86.3% | +82.2% | +93.6% | +65.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 60.5 | 54.1 | 55.6 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 1.2M | 602K | 378K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBP as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", KYMR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 305.4% upside for NBP (target: $9) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $30.00 | $117.06 | $544.40 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 18 | 26 | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARQT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRAX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NBP vs RCUS vs KYMR vs PRAX vs ARQT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT?
Over the past 5 years, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -96. 3% for NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KYMR returned +154. 4% versus NBP's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning RCUS is approximately 70% more volatile than KYMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 88. 8% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARQT leads at 367. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT?
NovaBridge Biosciences (NBP) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -794. 4% for Kymera Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBP leads at 0. 0% versus -891. 3% for KYMR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KYMR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBP: 305.
4% to $9. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NBP or RCUS or KYMR or PRAX or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kymera Therapeutics, Inc.
(KYMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), +154. 4% 10Y return). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KYMR: +154. 4%, RCUS: +45. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NBP and RCUS and KYMR and PRAX and ARQT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KYMR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.