Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCL vs LX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
NCL vs LX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $4M | $147M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $14.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $1.61B |
| Gross Margin | -15.8% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | -114.7% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.3x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $5.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245K | $2.25B |
NCL vs LX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northann Corp. (NCL) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCL vs LX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.57
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 51.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, current ratio 0.61x
LX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -74.1% 10Y total return vs NCL's -99.6%
- 7.7% margin vs NCL's -135.6%
- 6.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs LX's 8.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.7% margin vs NCL's -135.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs LX's 1.25 | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -70.4% vs NCL's -95.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.2% ROA vs NCL's -117.9%, ROIC 11.0% vs -16.4% |
NCL vs LX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NCL vs LX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LX is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 1092.8x NCL's $13M. LX is the more profitable business, keeping 7.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCL's -135.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $14.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -114.7% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.6% | +7.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.2% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +110.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $147M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $590M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.86x | 2.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 0.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 0.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LX delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NCL. LX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCL's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs NCL's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.6% | +14.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -117.9% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.4% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -67.4% | +19.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.56x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245,164 | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -72.01x | 153.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LX five years ago would be worth $3,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for NCL. Over the past 12 months, LX leads with a -70.4% total return vs NCL's -95.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LX at 2.6% vs NCL's -84.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.5% | -31.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.6% | -70.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +8.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -66.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -74.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.2% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCL and LX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LX's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LX currently trades 22.0% from its 52-week high vs NCL's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.16 | $9.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $2.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +22.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 272K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
LX is the only dividend payer here at 6.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LX leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
NCL vs LX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCL or LX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (0. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NCL or LX?
Over the past 5 years, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) delivered a total return of -66. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Northann Corp. (NCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LX returned -74. 1% versus NCL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NCL or LX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. 's 1. 25β — meaning LX is approximately 121% more volatile than NCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 3% for Northann Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NCL or LX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northann Corp. grew EPS 51. 4% year-over-year, compared to 2. 5% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NCL or LX?
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus -28. 5% for Northann Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LX leads at 16. 1% versus -10. 9% for NCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LX leads at 35. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NCL or LX?
In this comparison, LX (6.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NCL or LX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCL: -99. 6%, LX: -74. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NCL and LX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCL (Consumer Cyclical) and LX (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock. LX pays a dividend while NCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.