Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NCL
Northann Corp.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalAMEX • US
Market Cap$4M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$147M
5Y Perf.+12.6%
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.29B
5Y Perf.+27.8%
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$3.75B
5Y Perf.-10.7%

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NCL logoNCL
LX logoLX
MHK logoMHK
QFIN logoQFIN
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFinancial - Credit ServicesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$4M$147M$6.29B$3.75B
Revenue (TTM)$13M$14.20B$10.99B$17.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-18M$1.61B$414M$6.89B
Gross Margin-15.8%35.4%24.3%61.8%
Operating Margin-114.7%16.1%4.9%43.9%
Forward P/E0.3x11.2x0.5x
Total Debt$7M$5.27B$2.76B$1.65B
Cash & Equiv.$245K$2.25B$856M$4.45B

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NCL
LX
MHK
QFIN
StockOct 23May 26Return
Northann Corp. (NCL)1000.2-99.8%
LexinFintech Holdin… (LX)100112.6+12.6%
Mohawk Industries, … (MHK)100127.8+27.8%
Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN)10089.3-10.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NCL and LX are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. QFIN and MHK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NCL
Northann Corp.
The Growth Play

NCL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 51.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.7%
  • 9.9% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
  • Beta 0.57 vs MHK's 1.34
Best for: growth exposure
LX
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
The Banking Pick

LX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (0.3x vs 0.5x)
  • 6.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: value and dividends
MHK
Mohawk Industries, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +1.9% vs NCL's -95.6%
Best for: momentum
QFIN
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
The Banking Pick

QFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.20, yield 9.3%
  • 16.1% 10Y total return vs MHK's -47.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 6.8%, current ratio 2.45x
  • Beta 1.20, yield 9.3%, current ratio 2.45x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNCL logoNCL9.9% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
ValueLX logoLXLower P/E (0.3x vs 0.5x)
Quality / MarginsQFIN logoQFIN36.5% margin vs NCL's -135.6%
Stability / SafetyNCL logoNCLBeta 0.57 vs MHK's 1.34
DividendsLX logoLX6.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs QFIN's 9.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MHK logoMHK+1.9% vs NCL's -95.6%
Efficiency (ROA)QFIN logoQFIN12.2% ROA vs NCL's -117.9%, ROIC 23.1% vs -16.4%

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NCLNorthann Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

LXLexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
FY 2024
Service
93.9%$1.3B
Service, Other
6.1%$86M
MHKMohawk Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Global Ceramic Segment
43.5%$4.2B
Carpet And Resilient
38.5%$3.7B
Laminate and Wood
18.1%$1.8B
QFINQfin Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Credit driven services
43.9%$11.7B
Financial Service
24.9%$6.6B
Platform services
20.4%$5.4B
Revenue From Loan Facilitation Services Under Fees Capital Light
4.7%$1.2B
Revenue from Loan Facilitation Services Under Fees Capital Light
3.3%$870M
Revenue from post-facilitation services
1.4%$378M
Other services fees.
1.4%$371M

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQFINLAGGINGMHK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 1320.7x NCL's $13M. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCL's -135.6%. On growth, NCL holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$13M$14.2B$11.0B$17.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$14M$1.8B$1.2B$8.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$18M$1.6B$414M$6.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$0$709M$10.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-15.8%+35.4%+24.3%+61.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-114.7%+16.1%+4.9%+43.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-135.6%+7.7%+3.8%+36.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-49.2%+5.9%+6.5%+53.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+38.6%+8.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.4%+110.3%+65.2%-9.7%
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 88% valuation discount to MHK's 17.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LX's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MHK's 7.0x.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
Market CapShares × price$4M$147M$6.3B$3.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10M$590M$8.2B$3.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.86x2.16x17.33x2.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.35x11.23x0.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.11x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.65x7.05x2.99x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.25x0.07x0.58x1.49x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.47x0.22x0.77x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF1.20x10.20x2.78x
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NCL. QFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCL's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs MHK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.6%+14.7%+5.0%+28.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-117.9%+7.2%+3.0%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-16.4%+11.0%+3.9%+23.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-67.4%+19.5%+4.8%+35.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–96867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.56x0.49x0.33x0.07x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$3.0B$1.9B-$2.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$245,164$2.3B$856M$4.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$7M$5.3B$2.8B$1.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-72.01x153.26x36.90x
QFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LX and MHK and QFIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in QFIN five years ago would be worth $8,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for NCL. Over the past 12 months, MHK leads with a +1.9% total return vs NCL's -95.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LX at 2.6% vs NCL's -84.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-51.5%-31.8%-6.2%-22.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-95.6%-70.4%+1.9%-63.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%+8.1%+2.9%+0.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-66.4%-55.3%-19.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-74.1%-47.6%+16.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-84.2%+2.6%+0.9%+0.2%
Evenly matched — LX and MHK and QFIN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NCL and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MHK's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MHK currently trades 71.8% from its 52-week high vs NCL's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x1.25x1.34x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.16$9.35$143.13$47.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.10$2.02$93.60$12.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+1.2%+22.0%+71.8%+28.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.844.750.653.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded272K1.5M1.1M1.4M
Evenly matched — NCL and MHK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LX and QFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LX as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", QFIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 26.5% for MHK (target: $130). For income investors, QFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 9.26% vs LX's 6.91%.

MetricNCL logoNCLNorthann Corp.LX logoLXLexinFintech Hold…MHK logoMHKMohawk Industries…QFIN logoQFINQfin Holdings, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$130.00$28.15
# AnalystsCovering analysts12324
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.9%+9.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises201
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.97$8.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.4%+11.6%
Evenly matched — LX and QFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallQfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NCL vs LX vs MHK vs QFIN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Northann Corp.

(NCL) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

Over the past 5 years, Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) delivered a total return of -19. 1%, compared to -99. 6% for Northann Corp. (NCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QFIN returned +16. 1% versus NCL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northann Corp.

(NCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning MHK is approximately 137% more volatile than NCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for Northann Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northann Corp.

(NCL) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MHK leads at -2. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -28. 5% for Northann Corp. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -10. 9% for NCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QFIN leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.

(LX) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 11. 2x for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN?

In this comparison, QFIN (9.

3% yield), LX (6. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NCL, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NCL or LX or MHK or QFIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.

(QFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QFIN: +16. 1%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NCL and LX and MHK and QFIN?

These companies operate in different sectors (NCL (Consumer Cyclical) and LX (Financial Services) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and QFIN (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. LX, QFIN pay a dividend while NCL, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NCL

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MHK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QFIN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NCL and LX and MHK and QFIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NCL: 38.6% · LX: 8.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.