Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
Advertising Agencies
REIT - Specialty
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | REIT - Specialty | Advertising Agencies | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $346M | $15.35B | $1.21B | $5.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $243M | $2.29B | $1.64B | $1.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $550M | $-205M | $187M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 23.6% | 39.3% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | -5.7% | 28.5% | 18.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.6x | — | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $6.18B | $6.47B | $4.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75M | $65M | $190M | $100M |
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National CineMedia,… (NCMI) | 100 | 13.5 | -86.5% |
| Lamar Advertising C… (LAMR) | 100 | 228.0 | +128.0% |
| Clear Channel Outdo… (CCO) | 100 | 246.4 | +146.4% |
| Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) | 100 | 233.8 | +133.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCMI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LAMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 4.3%
- 206.2% 10Y total return vs OUT's 100.2%
- 24.0% margin vs CCO's -12.5%
- Beta 0.64 vs CCO's 1.31
CCO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 43.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 6.6% revenue growth vs OUT's 0.0%
OUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.69x
- Better valuation composite
- +117.8% vs NCMI's -25.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs OUT's 0.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.0% margin vs CCO's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs CCO's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NCMI's 3.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.8% vs NCMI's -25.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CCO's -5.4%, ROIC 8.2% vs 7.4% |
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAMR leads in 4 of 6 categories
NCMI leads 1 • OUT leads 1 • CCO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 9.4x NCMI's $243M. LAMR is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCO's -12.5%. On growth, CCO holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $243M | $2.3B | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $1.1B | $484M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $550M | -$205M | $187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $769M | $73M | $234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +23.6% | +39.3% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.7% | +28.5% | +18.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +24.0% | -12.5% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +33.6% | +4.4% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +4.5% | +11.9% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | -25.9% | -175.0% | +178.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NCMI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.2x trailing earnings, LAMR trades at a 31% valuation discount to OUT's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCMI's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAMR's 21.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $346M | $15.4B | $1.2B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $293M | $21.5B | $7.5B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.73x | 26.20x | -11.33x | 37.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.63x | — | 26.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.23x | 20.96x | 15.63x | 20.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 6.78x | 0.76x | 3.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | 14.99x | — | 7.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 123.60x | 20.86x | 37.88x | 26.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR delivers a 55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NCMI. NCMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAMR's 6.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCMI scores 7/9 vs OUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.9% | +55.5% | — | +26.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +8.0% | -5.4% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.9% | +8.2% | +7.4% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | +11.4% | +9.0% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 6.04x | — | 5.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$53M | $6.1B | $6.3B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75M | $65M | $190M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $6.2B | $6.5B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.17x | 4.83x | 1.13x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAMR five years ago would be worth $16,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,475 for NCMI. Over the past 12 months, OUT leads with a +117.8% total return vs NCMI's -25.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUT at 35.7% vs NCMI's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +23.1% | +12.3% | +39.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.3% | +33.2% | +116.4% | +117.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +78.3% | +88.9% | +150.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | +68.1% | -7.0% | +57.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.0% | +206.2% | -43.7% | +100.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.2% | +21.3% | +23.6% | +35.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CCO's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAMR currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs NCMI's 66.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 0.64x | 1.31x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.56 | $151.36 | $2.43 | $33.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.92 | $112.00 | $1.00 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.7% | +99.9% | +97.9% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 69.3 | 48.5 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 472K | 557K | 7.0M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NCMI as "Hold", LAMR as "Buy", CCO as "Hold", OUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 102.2% upside for NCMI (target: $8) vs -19.8% for OUT (target: $26). For income investors, LAMR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs NCMI's 3.26%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $145.00 | $2.25 | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 20 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +4.3% | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $6.46 | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LAMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NCMI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NCMI vs LAMR vs CCO vs OUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 0% for Outfront Media Inc. (OUT). Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) offers the better valuation at 26. 2x trailing P/E (26. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
On trailing P/E, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the cheapest at 26.
2x versus Outfront Media Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Outfront Media Inc. is actually cheaper at 26. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
Over the past 5 years, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) delivered a total return of +68.
1%, compared to -85. 3% for National CineMedia, Inc. (NCMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAMR returned +206. 2% versus NCMI's -71. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning CCO is approximately 106% more volatile than LAMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National CineMedia, Inc. (NCMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 6% for Lamar Advertising Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc.
(CCO) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus 0. 0% for Outfront Media Inc. (OUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lamar Advertising Company grew EPS 63. 9% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Outfront Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCO leads at 5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -6. 5% for Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAMR leads at 30. 8% versus -5. 7% for NCMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCO leads at 42. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Outfront Media Inc.
(OUT) trades at 26. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 6x for Lamar Advertising Company — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCMI: 102. 2% to $7. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT?
In this comparison, LAMR (4.
3% yield), OUT (3. 8% yield), NCMI (3. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCMI or LAMR or CCO or OUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 4. 3% yield, +206. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAMR: +206. 2%, CCO: -43. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCMI and LAMR and CCO and OUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCMI (Communication Services) and LAMR (Real Estate) and CCO (Communication Services) and OUT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCMI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAMR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NCMI, LAMR, OUT pay a dividend while CCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 18%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 23%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NCMI vs VALU
VALU is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NCMI.
Compare LAMR vs IPG
IPG overlaps with LAMR in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add IPG to This Comparison
IPG is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.