Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NDLS
Noodles & Company

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$75M
5Y Perf.-53.1%
CAVA
CAVA Group, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.22B
5Y Perf.+93.9%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$42.32B
5Y Perf.-24.1%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.82B
5Y Perf.-9.8%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.70B
5Y Perf.+58.0%

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NDLS logoNDLS
CAVA logoCAVA
CMG logoCMG
SHAK logoSHAK
TXRH logoTXRH
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$75M$9.22B$42.32B$2.82B$11.70B
Revenue (TTM)$495M$848M$12.14B$1.49B$6.06B
Net Income (TTM)$-37M$38M$1.45B$41M$415M
Gross Margin10.0%67.4%36.1%7.5%18.7%
Operating Margin0.1%4.7%15.8%4.3%8.2%
Forward P/E150.2x28.6x54.4x28.1x
Total Debt$264M$466M$9.85B$902M$1.89B
Cash & Equiv.$1M$283M$351M$360M$135M

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NDLS
CAVA
CMG
SHAK
TXRH
StockJun 23May 26Return
Noodles & Company (NDLS)10046.9-53.1%
CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)100193.9+93.9%
Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG)10075.9-24.1%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)10090.2-9.8%
Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH)100158.0+58.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NDLS and CMG are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. TXRH and SHAK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NDLS
Noodles & Company
The Defensive Pick

NDLS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.

  • Beta 0.57, current ratio 0.31x
  • Beta 0.57 vs SHAK's 1.81
  • +86.3% vs CMG's -36.9%
Best for: defensive
CAVA
CAVA Group, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CAVA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

CMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 12.0% margin vs NDLS's -7.5%
  • 16.0% ROA vs NDLS's -13.6%, ROIC 15.3% vs -1.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Growth Play

SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 354.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
  • 15.4% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0%
Best for: growth exposure
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
The Income Pick

TXRH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.5%
  • 331.7% 10Y total return vs CMG's 258.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.75, current ratio 0.50x
  • PEG 0.41 vs CMG's 0.81
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHAK logoSHAK15.4% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0%
ValueTXRH logoTXRHLower P/E (28.1x vs 54.4x)
Quality / MarginsCMG logoCMG12.0% margin vs NDLS's -7.5%
Stability / SafetyNDLS logoNDLSBeta 0.57 vs SHAK's 1.81
DividendsTXRH logoTXRH1.5% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NDLS logoNDLS+86.3% vs CMG's -36.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CMG logoCMG16.0% ROA vs NDLS's -13.6%, ROIC 15.3% vs -1.5%

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NDLSNoodles & Company
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
98.0%$485M
Franchise
2.0%$10M
CAVACAVA Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Restaurant Revenue
100.0%$1.2B
CMGChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$11.9B
Delivery Service
0.5%$60M
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
TXRHTexas Roadhouse, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$5.8B
Franchise royalties
0.5%$28M
Franchise fees
0.0%$3M

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNDLSLAGGINGSHAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 24.5x NDLS's $495M. CMG is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NDLS's -7.5%. On growth, SHAK holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$495M$848M$12.1B$1.5B$6.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$113M$2.3B$173M$709M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$37M$38M$1.5B$41M$415M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$26M$1.5B$37M$361M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+67.4%+36.1%+7.5%+18.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.1%+4.7%+15.8%+4.3%+8.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-7.5%+4.5%+12.0%+2.8%+6.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.5%+3.1%+12.4%+2.5%+5.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.0%-125.0%+7.4%+14.3%+12.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+63.7%-127.3%-17.9%-110.0%+10.0%
CMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NDLS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 28.5x trailing earnings, CMG trades at a 81% valuation discount to CAVA's 147.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.42x vs CMG's 0.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Market CapShares × price$75M$9.2B$42.3B$2.8B$11.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$337M$9.4B$51.8B$3.4B$13.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.72x147.04x28.50x64.35x29.08x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.150.18x28.61x54.41x28.11x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.80x0.42x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.36x72.93x21.82x17.50x18.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.15x10.88x3.55x1.95x1.99x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.02x15.41x5.30x7.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF352.72x29.23x49.97x34.19x
NDLS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $5 for CAVA. CAVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMG's 3.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs NDLS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+48.4%+7.6%+27.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.6%+2.8%+16.0%+2.2%+12.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.5%+5.0%+15.3%+6.0%+14.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.2%+4.9%+25.4%+5.4%+20.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935574
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x3.48x1.63x1.27x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$263M$183M$9.5B$542M$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$283M$351M$360M$135M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$264M$466M$9.8B$902M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.12x16.87x
CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NDLS and CAVA and TXRH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $18,576 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,384 for NDLS. Over the past 12 months, NDLS leads with a +86.3% total return vs CMG's -36.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAVA at 21.9% vs NDLS's -30.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+113.7%+31.1%-13.3%-16.0%+4.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+86.3%-17.2%-36.9%-32.1%+4.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.7%+81.4%-20.1%+4.8%+71.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-86.2%+81.4%+16.7%-21.9%+85.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-85.5%+81.4%+258.6%+100.7%+331.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.7%+21.9%-7.2%+1.6%+19.7%
Evenly matched — NDLS and CAVA and TXRH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NDLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NDLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHAK's 1.81 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NDLS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs SHAK's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.57x1.78x1.09x1.81x0.75x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$13.95$101.50$58.42$144.65$199.99
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.77$43.41$29.75$67.20$153.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.8%+78.2%+55.6%+48.5%+88.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.742.347.023.842.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded91K2.8M14.5M1.5M1.0M
NDLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NDLS as "Hold", CAVA as "Buy", CMG as "Buy", SHAK as "Hold", TXRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 278.8% upside for NDLS (target: $48) vs 6.2% for TXRH (target: $188). TXRH is the only dividend payer here at 1.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNDLS logoNDLSNoodles & CompanyCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.TXRH logoTXRHTexas Roadhouse, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$48.00$86.69$43.72$104.60$188.36
# AnalystsCovering analysts1823673543
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.7%0.0%+1.3%
TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CMG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NDLS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallNoodles & Company (NDLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NDLS vs CAVA vs CMG vs SHAK vs TXRH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) offers the better valuation at 28. 5x trailing P/E (28. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

On trailing P/E, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the cheapest at 28. 5x versus CAVA Group, Inc. at 147. 0x. On forward P/E, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. wins at 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) delivered a total return of +85. 8%, compared to -86. 2% for Noodles & Company (NDLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +331. 7% versus NDLS's -85. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Noodles & Company (NDLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus Shake Shack Inc. 's 1. 81β — meaning SHAK is approximately 220% more volatile than NDLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 3% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shake Shack Inc.

(SHAK) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 9% for CAVA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHAK leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -8. 6% for Noodles & Company — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMG leads at 16. 9% versus -1. 0% for NDLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAVA leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 41x versus Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. 's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) trades at 28. 1x forward P/E versus 150. 2x for CAVA Group, Inc. — 122. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NDLS: 278. 8% to $48. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH?

In this comparison, TXRH (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. NDLS, CAVA, CMG, SHAK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NDLS or CAVA or CMG or SHAK or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 5% yield, +331. 7% 10Y return). Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK) carries a higher beta of 1. 81 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +331. 7%, SHAK: +100. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NDLS and CAVA and CMG and SHAK and TXRH?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NDLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TXRH pays a dividend while NDLS, CAVA, CMG, SHAK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NDLS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CAVA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMG

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TXRH

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NDLS and CAVA and CMG and SHAK and TXRH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NDLS: -0.0% · CAVA: -125.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.