Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $168M | $594M | $25.94B | $24.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $193M | $3.04B | $3.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $554M | $1.05B | $954M |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 55.2% | 67.0% | 46.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 66.3% | 30.1% | 28.5% |
| Forward P/E | 34.7x | 1.1x | 37.9x | 50.8x |
| Total Debt | $528M | $0.00 | $9.33B | $8.78B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26.67B | $395M | $187M | $56M |
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New England Realty … (NEN) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
| Apartment Investmen… (AIV) | 100 | 86.4 | -13.6% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 109.2 | +9.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 8.0%
- Rev growth 10.8%, EPS growth -61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 4247.47x
- PEG 1.00 vs EQR's 9.98
AIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 84.8% 10Y total return vs NEN's 48.1%
- 287.7% margin vs NEN's 6.8%
- 69.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EQR's 4.1%
- -1.4% vs NEN's -21.5%
AVB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
EQR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.8% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.7x vs 50.8x), PEG 1.00 vs 9.98 | |
| Quality / Margins | 287.7% margin vs NEN's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs AIV's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 69.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs EQR's 4.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.4% vs NEN's -21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.6% ROA vs NEN's 1.3% |
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AIV leads 1 • NEN leads 1 • AVB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 35.0x NEN's $89M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (AIV) to 6.8% (NEN). On growth, NEN holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $193M | $3.0B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $186M | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $554M | $1.1B | $954M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | -$230M | $1.5B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +55.2% | +67.0% | +46.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +66.3% | +30.1% | +28.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +2.9% | +34.6% | +30.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | -119.5% | +49.7% | +42.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | -3.4% | +3.7% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.3% | +25.9% | -40.9% | -64.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NEN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AIV trades at a 97% valuation discount to NEN's 34.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEN offers better value at 1.00x vs AVB's 5.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $168M | $594M | $25.9B | $24.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$26.0B | $199M | $35.1B | $33.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.71x | 1.10x | 25.23x | 22.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 37.85x | 50.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.00x | — | 5.39x | 4.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.12x | 1.99x | 19.20x | 15.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | — | 8.53x | 7.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.15x | 2.24x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.01x | — | 18.35x | 19.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV delivers a 162.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $163 in annual profit, vs $8 for EQR. EQR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVB's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EQR scores 6/9 vs AIV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +162.9% | +8.8% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +29.6% | +4.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.2% | +3.3% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +2.3% | +4.4% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.79x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$26.1B | -$395M | $9.1B | $8.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26.7B | $395M | $187M | $56M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $528M | $0 | $9.3B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.17x | 0.70x | 5.07x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EQR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEN five years ago would be worth $12,616 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,776 for EQR. Over the past 12 months, AIV leads with a -1.4% total return vs NEN's -21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EQR at 5.7% vs NEN's -0.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.8% | -3.6% | +4.3% | +8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.5% | -1.4% | -6.9% | -2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.4% | +4.3% | +14.8% | +18.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +23.9% | +13.7% | +7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | +84.8% | +32.9% | +31.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.1% | +1.4% | +4.7% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEN and EQR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIV's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EQR currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs AIV's 47.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.69x | 0.48x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.85 | $8.87 | $209.86 | $71.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.00 | $3.94 | $160.09 | $57.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +47.8% | +88.8% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 51.3 | 69.8 | 70.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 990 | 3.1M | 936K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIV and EQR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIV as "Hold", AVB as "Hold", EQR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 135.8% upside for AIV (target: $10) vs 2.8% for AVB (target: $192). For income investors, AIV offers the higher dividend yield at 69.48% vs AVB's 3.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $191.70 | $70.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 42 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.0% | +69.5% | +3.7% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.80 | $2.95 | $6.99 | $2.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.0% | +1.9% | +1.1% |
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AIV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
NEN vs AIV vs AVB vs EQR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger pick with 10.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
On trailing P/E, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: AvalonBay Communities, Inc. wins at 8. 09x versus Equity Residential's 9. 98x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
Over the past 5 years, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) delivered a total return of +26.
2%, compared to +7. 8% for Equity Residential (EQR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIV returned +84. 8% versus EQR's +31. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus Apartment Investment and Management Company's 0. 69β — meaning AIV is approximately 399% more volatile than NEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equity Residential (EQR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 79% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is pulling ahead at 10.
8% versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apartment Investment and Management Company grew EPS 623. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 4% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEN leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the more profitable company, earning 287.
7% net margin versus 6. 8% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership — meaning it keeps 287. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIV leads at 66. 3% versus 24. 4% for NEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVB leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 8. 09x versus Equity Residential's 9. 98x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 9x forward P/E versus 50. 8x for Equity Residential — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIV: 135. 8% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the highest yield at 69. 5%, versus 3. 7% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB).
09Is NEN or AIV or AVB or EQR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), 8. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEN: +48. 1%, AIV: +84. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEN and AIV and AVB and EQR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.