Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Construction
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Construction |
| Market Cap | $35M | $1.17B | $1.92B | $469M | $916M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1.37B | $674M | $307M | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $776K | $55M | $-173M | $-28M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 53.6% | 75.2% | 53.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 11.3% | -27.2% | -9.4% | -10.0% |
| Forward P/E | 29.4x | 8.4x | — | — | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $835M | $290M | $0.00 | $854M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $41M | $103M | $56M | $76M |
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nephros, Inc. (NEPH) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| CONMED Corporation (CNMD) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO) | 100 | 109.7 | +9.7% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 32.7%, EPS growth -10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.59, current ratio 4.06x
- 4.1% margin vs NVCR's -25.7%
CNMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.34, yield 2.1%
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.1x)
- 2.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NX's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ANGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 23.7% 10Y total return vs NVCR's 30.3%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs ANGO's -3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs NVCR's -25.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NX's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +65.6% vs CNMD's -31.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs NVCR's -16.5%, ROIC 14.2% vs -16.4% |
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CNMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
NEPH leads 2 • NVCR leads 0 • ANGO leads 0 • NX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CNMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 96.6x NEPH's $19M. NEPH is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVCR's -25.7%. On growth, NVCR holds the edge at +12.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1.4B | $674M | $307M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $806,000 | $219M | -$165M | -$5M | -$81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $776,000 | $55M | -$173M | -$28M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$348,000 | $124M | -$48M | -$9M | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +53.6% | +75.2% | +53.7% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +11.3% | -27.2% | -9.4% | -10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +4.0% | -25.7% | -9.0% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +9.0% | -7.1% | -3.0% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | -0.7% | +12.3% | +9.0% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -81.0% | +136.8% | -100.0% | +42.3% | +71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.2x trailing earnings, CNMD trades at a 14% valuation discount to NEPH's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CNMD's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NEPH's 23.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $35M | $1.2B | $1.9B | $469M | $916M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $2.0B | $2.1B | $413M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.36x | 25.22x | -13.80x | -13.58x | -3.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.41x | — | — | 10.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.69x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.90x | 10.17x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.87x | 0.85x | 2.92x | 1.60x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 1.15x | 5.51x | 2.52x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.32x | 7.78x | — | — | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEPH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEPH delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. NEPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEPH scores 6/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +5.4% | -50.8% | -15.7% | -30.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +2.4% | -16.5% | -10.3% | -11.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +5.8% | -16.4% | -22.9% | -8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +7.0% | -28.9% | -18.6% | -10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.81x | 0.85x | — | 1.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $794M | $187M | -$56M | $778M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $41M | $103M | $56M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $835M | $290M | $0 | $854M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 588.00x | 5.20x | -96.80x | -258.19x | -3.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NX five years ago would be worth $7,802 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NEPH leads with a +65.6% total return vs CNMD's -31.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEPH at 29.4% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.0% | -6.0% | +28.3% | -11.1% | +31.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.6% | -31.3% | +1.1% | +28.5% | +23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.8% | -67.3% | -75.7% | +25.8% | +6.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | -71.0% | -91.3% | -53.3% | -22.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.5% | +6.6% | +30.3% | -9.2% | +23.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.4% | -31.1% | -37.6% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEPH and NX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 87.3% from its 52-week high vs NEPH's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.32x | 2.15x | 1.26x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.42 | $61.08 | $20.06 | $13.99 | $22.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.83 | $33.21 | $9.82 | $8.36 | $11.04 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.3% | +62.4% | +83.9% | +80.6% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 49.6 | 69.8 | 54.0 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 406K | 1.5M | 395K | 458K |
Analyst Outlook
CNMD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNMD as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy", ANGO as "Hold", NX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 104.8% upside for CNMD (target: $78) vs 46.4% for ANGO (target: $17). For income investors, CNMD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.09% vs NX's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $78.00 | $33.50 | $16.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 | 15 | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.79 | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.5% |
CNMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NEPH leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NEPH vs CNMD vs NVCR vs ANGO vs NX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). CONMED Corporation (CNMD) offers the better valuation at 25. 2x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NovoCure Limited (NVCR) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
On trailing P/E, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is the cheapest at 25.
2x versus Nephros, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, CONMED Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
Over the past 5 years, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) delivered a total return of -22.
0%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVCR returned +38. 5% versus ANGO's -9. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 272% more volatile than NEPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nephros, Inc. (NEPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEPH leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -20. 8% for NovoCure Limited — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNMD leads at 10. 3% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) trades at 8.
4x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Quanex Building Products Corporation — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNMD: 104. 8% to $78. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX?
In this comparison, CNMD (2.
1% yield), NX (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NEPH, NVCR, ANGO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEPH or CNMD or NVCR or ANGO or NX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEPH: +11. 7%, NVCR: +38. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEPH and CNMD and NVCR and ANGO and NX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEPH (Healthcare) and CNMD (Healthcare) and NVCR (Healthcare) and ANGO (Healthcare) and NX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ANGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock. CNMD, NX pay a dividend while NEPH, NVCR, ANGO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.