Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Regulated Gas
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling | Regulated Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $7.62B | $1.84T | $5.60B | $2.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.50B | $1M | $2.21B | $4.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $686M | $-498M | $341M | $638M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | -8.7% | 27.7% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | 41.4% | -367.6% | 24.1% | 31.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 7.5x | 16.4x | 6.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.83B | $0.00 | $3.77B | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $43M | $98M | $10M | $76M |
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Fuel Gas C… (NFG) | 100 | 161.5 | +61.5% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.5 | +32.5% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 132.4 | +32.4% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NFG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 27.5% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- 7.7% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.6% vs -44.6%
SOC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NJR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs NFG's 82.4%
- +17.6% vs SOC's -36.8%
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 18.2%
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 67.8%, current ratio 0.45x
- PEG 0.32 vs NJR's 1.15
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs SOC's 9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 16.4x), PEG 0.32 vs 1.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.5% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, vs NFG's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.6% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.6% vs -44.6% |
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFG leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIVI leads 1 • NJR leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3702.4x SOC's $1M. NFG is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, NFG holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $1M | $2.2B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | -$454M | $727M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $686M | -$498M | $341M | $638M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $307M | -$611M | -$527M | $934M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | -8.7% | +27.7% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | -367.6% | +24.1% | +31.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | -391.5% | +15.4% | +13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | -480.4% | -23.9% | +19.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.6% | — | +7.1% | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -5.4% | +6.9% | -33.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 81% valuation discount to NJR's 16.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CIVI offers better value at 0.15x vs NJR's 1.17x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.6B | $1.84T | $5.6B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.4B | $1.84T | $9.4B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.12x | -3.07x | 16.67x | 3.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.30x | 7.50x | 16.42x | 6.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.17x | 0.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.20x | — | 14.99x | 1.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.35x | — | 2.76x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.36x | 2359.43x | 2.34x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.72x | — | — | 2.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFG delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. CIVI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFG scores 9/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | -113.8% | +18.7% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | -28.9% | +6.0% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | -44.6% | +5.5% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.8% | -37.5% | +6.8% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.92x | — | 1.58x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.8B | -$98M | $3.8B | $4.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $43M | $98M | $10M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $0 | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.01x | -2.28x | 4.32x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NFG and NJR each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFG five years ago would be worth $17,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,194 for CIVI. Over the past 12 months, NJR leads with a +17.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFG at 17.2% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | +9.5% | +21.8% | -1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.1% | -36.8% | +17.6% | +6.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.1% | +26.5% | +21.1% | -41.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.4% | +32.6% | +46.6% | +31.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | +32.4% | +90.4% | -86.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +8.2% | +6.6% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NJR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NJR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.08x | 1.51x | -0.13x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $97.06 | $35.00 | $57.85 | $37.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.22 | $3.72 | $43.46 | $25.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +36.7% | +96.0% | +73.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.7 | 45.8 | 44.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 762K | 5.4M | 485K | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NFG and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFG as "Buy", SOC as "Buy", NJR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs NFG's 2.57%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $101.00 | $27.00 | $55.75 | $31.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 4 | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | — | +3.2% | +18.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 31 | — | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.07 | — | $1.79 | $4.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +18.3% |
NFG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CIVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NFG vs SOC vs NJR vs CIVI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 9% for New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus New Jersey Resources Corporation at 16. 7x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Civitas Resources, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus New Jersey Resources Corporation's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
Over the past 5 years, National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) delivered a total return of +71.
4%, compared to +31. 9% for Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NJR returned +90. 4% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately -1244% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus 13. 9% for New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Fuel Gas Company grew EPS 576. 2% year-over-year, compared to -6. 2% for Civitas Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
8% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFG leads at 35. 7% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFG leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus New Jersey Resources Corporation's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for New Jersey Resources Corporation — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI?
In this comparison, CIVI (18.
2% yield), NJR (3. 2% yield), NFG (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NFG or SOC or NJR or CIVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NFG and SOC and NJR and CIVI?
These companies operate in different sectors (NFG (Energy) and SOC (Energy) and NJR (Utilities) and CIVI (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NFG is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock. NFG, NJR, CIVI pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.