Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NGL vs XOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.03B
5Y Perf.+221.8%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation

Oil & Gas Integrated

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$656.38B
5Y Perf.+240.6%

NGL vs XOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NGL logoNGL
XOM logoXOM
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Integrated
Market Cap$2.03B$656.38B
Revenue (TTM)$3.03B$323.90B
Net Income (TTM)$159M$28.84B
Gross Margin46.8%21.7%
Operating Margin13.3%10.5%
Forward P/E48.3x15.6x
Total Debt$3.08B$43.54B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$10.68B

NGL vs XOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NGL
XOM
StockMay 20May 26Return
NGL Energy Partners… (NGL)100321.8+221.8%
Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM)100340.6+240.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NGL vs XOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: XOM leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. NGL Energy Partners LP is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NGL
NGL Energy Partners LP
The Income Pick

NGL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 14.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 1.30x
  • Beta 0.67, yield 14.1%, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
The Growth Play

XOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth -14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
  • 115.7% 10Y total return vs NGL's 81.6%
  • -4.5% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthXOM logoXOM-4.5% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
ValueXOM logoXOMLower P/E (15.6x vs 48.3x)
Quality / MarginsXOM logoXOM8.9% margin vs NGL's 5.3%
Stability / SafetyXOM logoXOMLower D/E ratio (16.3% vs 442.2%)
DividendsNGL logoNGL14.1% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.6%
Momentum (1Y)NGL logoNGL+438.0% vs XOM's +53.9%
Efficiency (ROA)XOM logoXOM6.4% ROA vs NGL's 3.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs 6.4%

NGL vs XOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NGLNGL Energy Partners LP
FY 2025
Liquids Logistics Segment
52.9%$1.8B
Crude Oil Logistics Segment
25.4%$880M
Water Solutions Segment
21.8%$756M
XOMExxon Mobil Corporation
FY 2025
Energy Products
68.7%$217.8B
Upstream
17.6%$55.7B
Chemical Products
6.0%$18.9B
Specialty Products
5.4%$17.3B
Income From Equity Affiliates
1.7%$5.3B
Other Revenue
0.6%$2.1B

NGL vs XOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNGLLAGGINGXOM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 107.0x NGL's $3.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.9% (XOM) to 5.3% (NGL). On growth, XOM holds the edge at -1.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.0B$323.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$672M$59.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$159M$28.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$291M$23.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.8%+21.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.3%+10.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.3%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.6%+7.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-41.3%-1.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.2%-11.0%
NGL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, NGL's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than XOM's 11.5x.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Market CapShares × price$2.0B$656.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.1B$689.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-27.35x23.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.48.26x15.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.57x11.50x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.59x2.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.11x2.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.34x27.80x
Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NGL delivers a 132.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $133 in annual profit, vs $11 for XOM. XOM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGL's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+132.6%+10.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.6%+6.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.4%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage4.42x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.1B$32.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$10.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.1B$43.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.15x69.44x
XOM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $77,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,473 for XOM. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +438.0% total return vs XOM's +53.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 81.2% vs XOM's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+65.8%+27.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+438.0%+53.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+494.6%+53.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+670.4%+184.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+81.6%+115.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+81.2%+15.3%
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs XOM's 87.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.67x-0.15x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.59$176.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.90$101.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.9%+87.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.051.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded249K18.8M
Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates NGL as "Hold" and XOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.6% upside for XOM (target: $160) vs -87.8% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.09% vs XOM's 2.58%.

MetricNGL logoNGLNGL Energy Partne…XOM logoXOMExxon Mobil Corpo…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.00$160.43
# AnalystsCovering analysts1755
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+14.1%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises226
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.31$4.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+3.1%
Evenly matched — NGL and XOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NGL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). XOM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallNGL Energy Partners LP (NGL)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NGL vs XOM: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NGL or XOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger pick with -4.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NGL or XOM?

On forward P/E, Exxon Mobil Corporation is actually cheaper at 15.

6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NGL or XOM?

Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +670.

4%, compared to +184. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XOM returned +115. 7% versus NGL's +81. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NGL or XOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately -558% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NGL or XOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is pulling ahead at -4.

5% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NGL Energy Partners LP grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to -14. 5% for Exxon Mobil Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, XOM leads at -6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NGL or XOM?

Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

9% net margin versus 1. 1% for NGL Energy Partners LP — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: XOM leads at 10. 5% versus 9. 5% for NGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — XOM leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NGL or XOM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) trades at 15.

6x forward P/E versus 48. 3x for NGL Energy Partners LP — 32. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for XOM: 3. 6% to $160. 43.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NGL or XOM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 2. 6% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).

09

Is NGL or XOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +115. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +115. 7%, NGL: +81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NGL and XOM?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NGL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

XOM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NGL and XOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NGL: -41.3% · XOM: -1.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(NGL: 5.3% · XOM: 8.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.