Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Entertainment
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $18M | $142M | $481M | $7.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $4.20B | $6.11B | $29.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-202M | $-153M | $220M |
| Gross Margin | 8.6% | 9.2% | 12.7% | 35.9% |
| Operating Margin | -17.5% | -7.1% | -3.4% | 1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.3x | 3.8x | 3.1x |
| Total Debt | $53M | $16M | $49M | $5.15B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $1.02B | $1.19B | $10.25B |
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIP Group Inc. (NIPG) | 100 | 5.6 | -94.4% |
| DouYu International… (DOYU) | 100 | 27.9 | -72.1% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| Bilibili Inc. (BILI) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIPG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 48.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 48.4% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8%
DOYU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10, yield 100.0%, current ratio 3.63x
- Beta 1.10 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage
HUYA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -60.1% 10Y total return vs BILI's 95.6%
- +26.9% vs NIPG's -59.3%
BILI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (3.1x vs 3.8x)
- 0.8% margin vs NIPG's -31.2%
- 0.6% ROA vs NIPG's -8.6%, ROIC -8.4% vs -22.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.4% revenue growth vs DOYU's -22.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.1x vs 3.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.8% margin vs NIPG's -31.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs BILI's 1.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs NIPG's -59.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.6% ROA vs NIPG's -8.6%, ROIC -8.4% vs -22.7% |
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HUYA leads 1 • DOYU leads 1 • NIPG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BILI is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 351.2x NIPG's $84M. BILI is the more profitable business, keeping 0.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIPG's -31.2%. On growth, BILI holds the edge at +19.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $4.2B | $6.1B | $29.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$275M | -$120M | $845M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$202M | -$153M | $220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $0 | $0 | $3.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +9.2% | +12.7% | +35.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.5% | -7.1% | -3.4% | +1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -31.2% | -4.8% | -2.5% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.7% | -5.9% | -1.9% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.2% | +2.1% | +1.7% | +19.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.4% | +179.1% | -118.5% | +134.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NIPG and DOYU and HUYA and BILI each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $142M | $481M | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $64M | -$5M | $314M | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -3.31x | -103.70x | -46.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.29x | 3.84x | 3.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 38.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 0.23x | 0.54x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 0.23x | 0.67x | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 11.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BILI delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NIPG. DOYU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NIPG's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs DOYU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.5% | -6.5% | -2.4% | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | -4.7% | -1.7% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.7% | -15.4% | -1.7% | -8.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -30.5% | -10.3% | -2.1% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.00x | 0.01x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $46M | -$1.0B | -$1.1B | -$5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $1.0B | $1.2B | $10.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $53M | $16M | $49M | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -47.14x | — | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUYA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUYA five years ago would be worth $3,916 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $700 for NIPG. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs NIPG's -59.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DOYU at 31.1% vs NIPG's -58.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.1% | -31.8% | +5.6% | -16.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.3% | -34.2% | +26.9% | +25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | +125.5% | +99.7% | +10.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -71.6% | -60.8% | -78.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.0% | -78.8% | -60.1% | +95.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -58.8% | +31.1% | +25.9% | +3.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DOYU and HUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOYU is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BILI's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUYA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs NIPG's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.12x | 1.19x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.75 | $9.34 | $4.93 | $36.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $4.28 | $2.21 | $17.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.9% | +50.3% | +64.9% | +60.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.0 | 47.0 | 54.2 | 43.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 26K | 1.0M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
DOYU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DOYU as "Hold", HUYA as "Buy", BILI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.1% upside for DOYU (target: $9) vs 6.2% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, DOYU offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs HUYA's 56.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.03 | $3.40 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 15 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% | +56.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $68.16 | $12.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +10.9% | +7.6% | +0.2% |
BILI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUYA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NIPG vs DOYU vs HUYA vs BILI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NIP Group Inc.
(NIPG) is the stronger pick with 48. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). Analysts rate HUYA Inc. (HUYA) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI?
Over the past 5 years, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) delivered a total return of -60. 8%, compared to -93. 0% for NIP Group Inc. (NIPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BILI returned +96. 3% versus NIPG's -93. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
12β versus Bilibili Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning BILI is approximately 60% more volatile than DOYU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 57% for NIP Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NIP Group Inc.
(NIPG) is pulling ahead at 48. 4% versus -22. 8% for DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NIP Group Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -969. 4% for DouYu International Holdings Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NIPG leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI?
HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) is the more profitable company, earning -0. 8% net margin versus -187. 7% for NIP Group Inc. — meaning it keeps -0. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUYA leads at -3. 1% versus -46. 5% for NIPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BILI leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bilibili Inc.
(BILI) trades at 3. 1x forward P/E versus 4. 3x for DouYu International Holdings Limited — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOYU: 92. 1% to $9. 03.
07Which pays a better dividend — NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI?
In this comparison, DOYU (100.
0% yield), HUYA (56. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NIPG, BILI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NIPG or DOYU or HUYA or BILI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DouYu International Holdings Limited (DOYU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
12), 100. 0% yield). Bilibili Inc. (BILI) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DOYU: -78. 8%, BILI: +96. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NIPG and DOYU and HUYA and BILI?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIPG (Communication Services) and DOYU (Communication Services) and HUYA (Communication Services) and BILI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIPG is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOYU is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BILI is a small-cap high-growth stock. DOYU, HUYA pay a dividend while NIPG, BILI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.