Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Internet Content & Information
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $3M | $6M | $25M | $534M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $340M | $4M | $299M | $6.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $-5M | $-4M | $1.71B |
| Gross Margin | 9.1% | 10.7% | 22.8% | 80.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | -8.9% | -1.4% | 32.1% |
| Forward P/E | 3.0x | — | — | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $2M | $34M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $2M | $28M | $541M |
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nisun International… (NISN) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Future FinTech Grou… (FTFT) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 55.1 | -44.9% |
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 313.0 | +213.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NISN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FTFT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 77.5%, EPS growth 85.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -45.7%
- 77.5% revenue growth vs NISN's -12.2%
CLPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for stability and dividends.
- Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JFIN's 16.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- -5.4% vs NISN's -86.5%
JFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 16.9%
- -56.7% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 2.15x
- Beta 1.19, yield 16.9%, current ratio 2.15x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 77.5% revenue growth vs NISN's -12.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs FTFT's -120.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs FTFT's 2.54 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JFIN's 16.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -5.4% vs NISN's -86.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs FTFT's -11.9%, ROIC 39.9% vs -97.5% |
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
NISN leads 1 • CLPS leads 1 • FTFT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FTFT and JFIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 1706.7x FTFT's $4M. JFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTFT's -120.6%. On growth, FTFT holds the edge at +110.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $340M | $4M | $299M | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $31M | -$34M | -$1M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | -$5M | -$4M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $56.6B | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +10.7% | +22.8% | +80.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | -8.9% | -1.4% | +32.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -120.6% | -1.3% | +26.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.3% | +14767.2% | -2.3% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +110.9% | +15.3% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +100.0% | +75.8% | +44.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NISN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 43% valuation discount to NISN's 3.0x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $6M | $25M | $534M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$34M | $6M | $31M | $462M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.96x | -0.54x | -3.48x | 1.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 0.49x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -7.15x | — | — | 2.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 1.65x | 0.15x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.06x | 0.43x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 5.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN delivers a 39.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-16 for FTFT. JFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JFIN scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | -16.4% | -6.1% | +39.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | -11.9% | -3.2% | +21.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | -97.5% | -7.9% | +39.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | -117.5% | -9.8% | +32.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.04x | 0.59x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$37M | -$457,223 | $6M | -$489M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $2M | $28M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $2M | $34M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -228.78x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JFIN five years ago would be worth $12,123 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $49 for NISN. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs NISN's -86.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JFIN at 10.9% vs FTFT's -53.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.7% | +66.7% | -10.3% | -17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.5% | -16.1% | -5.4% | -54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.9% | -90.2% | +0.5% | +36.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -99.3% | -69.3% | +21.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -98.8% | -78.5% | -56.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.9% | -53.9% | +0.2% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTFT's 2.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs NISN's 11.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.06x | 2.54x | 0.27x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.95 | $4.03 | $1.88 | $19.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $0.56 | $0.80 | $3.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.4% | +31.0% | +48.2% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 46.4 | 49.8 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 113K | 108K | 15K | 63K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and JFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, JFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 16.87% vs CLPS's 14.60%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | +16.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | $5.67 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +34.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
JFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NISN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NISN vs FTFT vs CLPS vs JFIN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is the stronger pick with 77. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 2% for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co. , Ltd (NISN). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co. , Ltd at 3. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) delivered a total return of +21. 2%, compared to -99. 5% for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co. , Ltd (NISN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JFIN returned -56. 7% versus FTFT's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Future FinTech Group Inc. 's 2. 54β — meaning FTFT is approximately 835% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Future FinTech Group Inc.
(FTFT) is pulling ahead at 77. 5% versus -12. 2% for Nisun International Enterprise Development Group Co. , Ltd (NISN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Future FinTech Group Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, JFIN leads at 48. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -120. 6% for Future FinTech Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JFIN leads at 21. 5% versus -888. 0% for FTFT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JFIN leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
9% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NISN, FTFT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NISN or FTFT or CLPS or JFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Future FinTech Group Inc. (FTFT) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, FTFT: -98. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NISN and FTFT and CLPS and JFIN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NISN (Financial Services) and FTFT (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and JFIN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NISN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FTFT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLPS, JFIN pay a dividend while NISN, FTFT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.