Medical - Healthcare Plans
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Plans | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1712.35T | $31.16B | $5.90B | $20.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $0.00 | $2.31B | $1.56B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-462K | $-168M | $-208M | $153M | $-208M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | — | 64.8% | 65.4% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -102.0% | — | -13.4% | 12.3% | -6.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.8x | 582.8x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $22M | $214M | $70M | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $458K | $194M | $1.08B | $1.12B | $956M |
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NewGenIvf Group Lim… (NIVF) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 125.7 | +25.7% |
| Natera, Inc. (NTRA) | 100 | 540.4 | +440.4% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 134.5 | +34.5% |
| Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS) | 100 | 147.9 | +47.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NIVF doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
- +110.4% vs NIVF's -99.3%
NTRA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.9%, EPS growth 0.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 41.1%
- 20.9% 10Y total return vs EXAS's 16.7%
- 35.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
- Lower P/E (24.8x vs 582.8x)
- 9.8% margin vs NIVF's -16.5%
EXAS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.12 vs NIVF's 1.96
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.8x vs 582.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs NIVF's -16.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs NIVF's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs NIVF's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTRA leads 1 • EXAS leads 1 • NIVF leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIVF's -16.5%. On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +39.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $0 | $2.3B | $1.6B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | -$112M | -$310M | $212M | -$41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$461,617 | -$168M | -$208M | $153M | -$208M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$151M | $97M | $392M | $357M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | — | +64.8% | +65.4% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -102.0% | — | -13.4% | +12.3% | -6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.5% | — | -9.0% | +9.8% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | — | +4.2% | +25.1% | +11.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.2% | — | +39.8% | +28.2% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.4% | +91.5% | +185.4% | -4.1% | +90.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NIVF and DBVT and NTRA and ALKS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1712.35T | $31.2B | $5.9B | $20.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1712.35T | $30.3B | $4.9B | $21.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.06x | -0.76x | -144.62x | 24.76x | -95.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 582.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 17.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | — | 13.51x | 4.00x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.66x | 17.55x | 3.28x | 8.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 285.53x | 12.28x | 56.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs NIVF's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -59.5% | -130.2% | -15.3% | +8.8% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.2% | -89.0% | -10.6% | +5.4% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.7% | — | -36.1% | +18.9% | -3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.0% | -145.7% | -18.3% | +14.2% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$172M | -$862M | -$1.0B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457,740 | $194M | $1.1B | $1.1B | $956M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $22M | $214M | $70M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.71x | -189.82x | -25.21x | 32.30x | -5.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,587 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for NIVF. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs NIVF's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 60.6% vs NIVF's -97.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -84.0% | +4.9% | -3.9% | +25.3% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | +110.4% | +37.3% | +16.5% | +96.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +19.7% | +314.0% | +14.5% | +53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -69.1% | +115.9% | +60.9% | +0.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.0% | +2089.4% | -11.0% | +1669.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -97.8% | +6.2% | +60.6% | +4.6% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NIVF's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs NIVF's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 1.26x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $367.80 | $26.18 | $256.36 | $36.60 | $104.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $7.53 | $131.81 | $25.17 | $38.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +76.3% | +85.7% | +96.7% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 28.0 | 48.1 | 57.1 | 60.2 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 821K | 252K | 1.3M | 2.3M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs -1.6% for EXAS (target: $103).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $262.50 | $44.00 | $103.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 27 | 28 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
ALKS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NTRA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NIVF vs DBVT vs NTRA vs ALKS vs EXAS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) is the stronger pick with 35. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS?
Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) delivered a total return of +115. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for NewGenIvf Group Limited (NIVF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +20. 9% versus NIVF's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus NewGenIvf Group Limited's 1. 96β — meaning NIVF is approximately 1529% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) is pulling ahead at 35. 9% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Exact Sciences Corporation grew EPS 80. 3% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -9. 7% for NewGenIvf Group Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -21. 4% for NIVF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NIVF or DBVT or NTRA or ALKS or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), +1669% 10Y return). NewGenIvf Group Limited (NIVF) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, NIVF: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NIVF and DBVT and NTRA and ALKS and EXAS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NIVF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.