Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $3M | $300M | $2.50B | $280M | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $652K | $1M | $236M | $7M | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-50M | $-369M | $-136M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | -83.5% | 90.7% | — | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -36.8% | -52.6% | -168.6% | -22.2% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $2M | $99M | $78M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $54M | $222M | $47M | $3M |
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NKGen Biotech, Inc.… (NKGN) | 100 | 2.0 | -98.0% |
| Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) | 100 | 242.0 | +142.0% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 129.7 | +29.7% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 20.8 | -79.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NKGN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 70.2% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5%
STTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.53
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 11.70x
- Beta 1.53, current ratio 11.70x
- Beta 1.53 vs NKGN's 2.99
RCUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 45.9% 10Y total return vs STTK's -67.6%
Among these 5 stocks, FATE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 0.1% margin vs STTK's -49.9%
- 0.1% ROA vs NKGN's -148.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 70.2% revenue growth vs STTK's -82.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs STTK's -49.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs NKGN's 2.99 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.2% vs NKGN's -55.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs NKGN's -148.7% |
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories
STTK leads 1 • NKGN leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • FATE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCUS is the larger business by revenue, generating $236M annually — 362.0x NKGN's $652,000. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STTK's -49.9%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $652,000 | $1M | $236M | $7M | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$50M | -$391M | -$148M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$50M | -$369M | -$136M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$41M | -$489M | -$88M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | -83.5% | +90.7% | — | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | -52.6% | -168.6% | -22.2% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.1% | -49.9% | -156.4% | -20.5% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -30.2% | -41.3% | -2.1% | -13.2% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -39.3% | -26.4% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.0% | +51.9% | +10.5% | +38.6% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $300M | $2.5B | $280M | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $247M | $2.4B | $312M | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | -8.94x | -7.54x | -2.11x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 1.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 299.87x | 10.11x | 42.18x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.29x | 4.22x | 1.39x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NKGN and STTK and RCUS and AGEN each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STTK delivers a -60.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-61 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. STTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FATE's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -60.7% | -69.0% | -65.8% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -148.7% | -55.7% | -35.3% | -42.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | -139.4% | -64.1% | -36.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.3% | -62.0% | -42.1% | -43.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.16x | 0.38x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | -$53M | -$123M | $31M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $54M | $222M | $47M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $2M | $99M | $78M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | — | -13.38x | — | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STTK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCUS five years ago would be worth $8,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $105 for NKGN. Over the past 12 months, STTK leads with a +617.6% total return vs NKGN's -55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STTK at 32.4% vs NKGN's -78.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +68.7% | +6.5% | +145.5% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.9% | +617.6% | +209.6% | +143.0% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | +131.9% | +24.9% | -55.4% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -78.8% | -18.6% | -96.8% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -67.6% | +45.9% | +40.5% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.1% | +32.4% | +7.7% | -23.6% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STTK and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STTK is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKGN's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NKGN's 13.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.99x | 1.53x | 1.95x | 2.17x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.46 | $8.33 | $28.72 | $2.46 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.71 | $7.06 | $0.91 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.0% | +75.2% | +86.3% | +98.6% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 45.0 | 60.5 | 81.0 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 562K | 1.2M | 1.9M | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STTK as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", FATE as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.50 | $30.00 | $39.50 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 18 | 31 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
AGEN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STTK leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NKGN vs STTK vs RCUS vs FATE vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -82. 5% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). Analysts rate Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
(RCUS) delivered a total return of -18. 6%, compared to -98. 9% for NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock (NKGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCUS returned +45. 9% versus NKGN's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 99β — meaning NKGN is approximately 96% more volatile than STTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 38% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -82. 5% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -48. 8% for Shattuck Labs, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGEN leads at -18. 0% versus -51. 5% for STTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525.
5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NKGN or STTK or RCUS or FATE or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shattuck Labs, Inc.
(STTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. NKGen Biotech, Inc. Common Stock (NKGN) carries a higher beta of 2. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (STTK: -67. 6%, NKGN: -98. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NKGN and STTK and RCUS and FATE and AGEN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.