NMRK vs CIGI

For growth investors, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 3% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI). Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the cheapest at 24. 0x versus Colliers International Group Inc. at 47. 1x. On forward P/E, Newmark Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -15. 5% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIGI returned +149. 6% versus NMRK's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Colliers International Group Inc.

(CIGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 26β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 26% more volatile than CIGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 114% for Newmark Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 17. 3% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Newmark Group, Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 0% for Colliers International Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIGI leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus 1. 9% for Colliers International Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIGI leads at 7. 2% versus 7. 0% for NMRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMRK leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 8x for Colliers International Group Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CIGI: 87. 6% to $182. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) offers the highest yield at 0. 5%, versus 0. 4% for Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NMRK: +26. 5%, CIGI: +149. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

NMRK pays a dividend while CIGI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.