NMRK vs WELL vs CBRE vs VTR

For growth investors, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 4% for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Newmark Group, Inc.

(NMRK) is the cheapest at 24. 0x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 7x. On forward P/E, Newmark Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Newmark Group, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.

(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to +55. 9% for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +382. 3% versus NMRK's +26. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.

(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Newmark Group, Inc. 's 1. 58β — meaning NMRK is approximately 16580% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 114% for Newmark Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 13. 4% for CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Welltower Inc.

(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 2. 9% for CBRE Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VTR leads at 14. 2% versus 3. 2% for CBRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMRK leads at 94. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 118. 3x for Ventas, Inc. — 109. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMRK: 28. 6% to $21. 00.

In this comparison, VTR (2.

1% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield), NMRK (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CBRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.

(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +67. 4%, NMRK: +26. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NMRK is a small-cap high-growth stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NMRK, WELL, VTR pay a dividend while CBRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.