Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Aerospace & Defense
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Business Services | Aerospace & Defense | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $2.64B | $529.86B | $3M | $1.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5M | $72M | $1M | $98M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-189M | $-25.02B | $-36M | $-87M |
| Gross Margin | -256.2% | 40.8% | 66.0% | 24.5% |
| Operating Margin | -15.4% | -121.4% | -24.4% | -35.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $15M | $8.76B | $6M | $16M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $24.81B | $2M | $42M |
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 197.1 | +97.1% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 20.5 | -79.5% |
| Momentus Inc. (MNTS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| BlackSky Technology… (BKSY) | 100 | 39.4 | -60.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 1.33
- 100.1% 10Y total return vs BKSY's -58.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.33, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 12.71x
SPIR plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
MNTS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BKSY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.4%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 4.4% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- -89.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- +268.9% vs NN's +41.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.4% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -89.1% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs MNTS's 3.48 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +268.9% vs NN's +41.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -24.0% ROA vs MNTS's -281.8%, ROIC -26.5% vs -7.3% |
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NN leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKSY leads 1 • SPIR leads 1 • MNTS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKSY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKSY is the larger business by revenue, generating $98M annually — 94.8x MNTS's $1M. BKSY is the more profitable business, keeping -89.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, MNTS holds the edge at +118.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5M | $72M | $1M | $98M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$62M | -$74M | -$24M | -$3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$189M | -$25.0B | -$36M | -$87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | -$16.2B | -$18M | -$74M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +40.8% | +66.0% | +24.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.4% | -121.4% | -24.4% | -35.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.4% | -349.6% | -34.5% | -89.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | -227.0% | -17.9% | -75.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.5% | -26.9% | +118.7% | -29.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.2% | +59.5% | -140.0% | -22.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SPIR and MNTS and BKSY each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $529.9B | $3M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $513.8B | $7M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.74x | 10.01x | -0.11x | -15.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 577.54x | 7405.21x | 1.26x | 11.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.56x | — | 11.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR delivers a -88.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-88 in annual profit, vs $-99 for BKSY. SPIR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BKSY's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs BKSY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -88.4% | — | -98.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -73.1% | -47.3% | -2.8% | -24.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.1% | -7.3% | -26.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.6% | -0.1% | -13.2% | -16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x | — | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$16.1B | $4M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $24.8B | $2M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $8.8B | $6M | $16M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.64x | 9.20x | -54.08x | -5.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NN five years ago would be worth $19,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6 for MNTS. Over the past 12 months, BKSY leads with a +268.9% total return vs NN's +41.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 109.2% vs MNTS's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.3% | +106.4% | -23.2% | +54.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.4% | +73.1% | +153.4% | +268.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +816.0% | +198.1% | -98.4% | +241.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.1% | -79.6% | -99.9% | -59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.1% | -78.8% | -99.9% | -58.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +109.2% | +43.9% | -74.9% | +50.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NN is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNTS's 3.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NN currently trades 80.7% from its 52-week high vs MNTS's 27.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 2.93x | 3.48x | 2.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.19 | $23.59 | $15.98 | $42.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.84 | $6.60 | $0.44 | $8.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +68.3% | +27.6% | +75.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 55.5 | 48.1 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 1.6M | 1.8M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NN as "Buy", SPIR as "Buy", BKSY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.0% upside for NN (target: $26) vs -28.7% for BKSY (target: $23).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.33 | $17.25 | — | $23.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
NN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). BKSY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
NN vs SPIR vs MNTS vs BKSY: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackSky Technology Inc.
(BKSY) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY?
Over the past 5 years, NextNav Inc.
(NN) delivered a total return of +96. 1%, compared to -99. 9% for Momentus Inc. (MNTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NN returned +100. 1% versus MNTS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextNav Inc.
(NN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Momentus Inc. 's 3. 48β — meaning MNTS is approximately 162% more volatile than NN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 16% for BlackSky Technology Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackSky Technology Inc.
(BKSY) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -69. 0% for NextNav Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MNTS leads at 85. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKSY leads at -44. 0% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNTS leads at 96. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NN or SPIR or MNTS or BKSY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextNav Inc.
(NN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+100. 1% 10Y return). Momentus Inc. (MNTS) carries a higher beta of 3. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NN: +100. 1%, MNTS: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NN and SPIR and MNTS and BKSY?
These companies operate in different sectors (NN (Communication Services) and SPIR (Industrials) and MNTS (Industrials) and BKSY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; MNTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BKSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.