NNDM vs ENTG

For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) offers the better valuation at 95. 3x trailing P/E (41. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Entegris, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 41. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) delivered a total return of +30. 4%, compared to -72. 3% for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENTG returned +1040% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 53% more volatile than NNDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 98% for Entegris, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.

(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Entegris, Inc. grew EPS -19. 7% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENTG leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) trades at 41. 4x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 143. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, ENTG (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. NNDM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Entegris, Inc.

(ENTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1040% 10Y return). Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENTG: +1040%, NNDM: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.