NOAH vs CNF vs BEKE vs FUTU vs TIGR

For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (1. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is the cheapest at 2.

2x versus KE Holdings Inc. at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Noah Holdings Limited is actually cheaper at 1. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) delivered a total return of +15.

0%, compared to -90. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUTU returned +875. 5% versus CNF's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

09β versus Futu Holdings Limited's 2. 04β — meaning FUTU is approximately 2134% more volatile than CNF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 118% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.

Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -60. 9% for CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -122. 3% for CNFinance Holdings Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) is the more profitable company, earning 40.

1% net margin versus -73. 1% for CNFinance Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 40. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUTU leads at 48. 7% versus -11. 2% for CNF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CNF leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) trades at 1.

1x forward P/E versus 6. 8x for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — 5. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUTU: 55. 2% to $224. 80.

In this comparison, NOAH (97.

4% yield), BEKE (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CNF, FUTU, TIGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CNFinance Holdings Limited (CNF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

09)). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNF: -95. 8%, TIGR: -39. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NOAH (Financial Services) and CNF (Financial Services) and BEKE (Real Estate) and FUTU (Financial Services) and TIGR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NOAH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CNF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BEKE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FUTU is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. NOAH, BEKE pay a dividend while CNF, FUTU, TIGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.