Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NODK vs DGICA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
NODK vs DGICA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $267M | $625M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $298M | $978M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $79M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 26.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 10.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $35M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $678K | $27M |
NODK vs DGICA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
| Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NODK vs DGICA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NODK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +4.3% vs DGICA's -8.9%
DGICA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 4.8%
- Rev growth -1.2%, EPS growth 42.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.9%
- 52.0% 10Y total return vs NODK's -12.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.1% margin vs NODK's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NODK's 0.57 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.3% vs DGICA's -8.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs NODK's 0.5% |
NODK vs DGICA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NODK vs DGICA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGICA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGICA is the larger business by revenue, generating $978M annually — 3.3x NODK's $298M. DGICA is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's 0.9%. On growth, DGICA holds the edge at -3.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $298M | $978M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $101M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $79M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +26.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +10.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | -3.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | -35.6% |
Valuation Metrics
DGICA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $267M | $625M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $634M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 7.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 133.00x | 8.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DGICA leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DGICA delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for NODK. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DGICA scores 6/9 vs NODK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$678,000 | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $678,000 | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $35M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 73.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DGICA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DGICA five years ago would be worth $13,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,916 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, NODK leads with a +4.3% total return vs DGICA's -8.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DGICA at 10.6% vs NODK's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | -8.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.7% | +35.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +35.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +52.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.9% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NODK and DGICA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DGICA is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NODK currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs DGICA's 81.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $21.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $16.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +81.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 39.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 110K |
Analyst Outlook
DGICA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
DGICA is the only dividend payer here at 4.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DGICA leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
NODK vs DGICA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NODK or DGICA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is the stronger pick with -1. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NODK or DGICA?
Over the past 5 years, Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) delivered a total return of +35. 8%, compared to -30. 8% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGICA returned +52. 0% versus NODK's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NODK or DGICA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning NODK is approximately 68% more volatile than DGICA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NODK or DGICA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is pulling ahead at -1. 2% versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Donegal Group Inc. grew EPS 42. 5% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NODK or DGICA?
Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus 0. 9% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DGICA leads at 10. 0% versus 1. 5% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DGICA leads at 26. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NODK or DGICA?
In this comparison, DGICA (4.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NODK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NODK or DGICA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DGICA: +52. 0%, NODK: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NODK and DGICA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGICA is a small-cap deep-value stock. DGICA pays a dividend while NODK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare NODK vs ACGL
ACGL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to NODK.
Compare DGICA vs ERIE
ERIE is one of the most direct listed alternatives to DGICA.
Expand With ERIE + PLMR
ERIE and PLMR are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.