Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Property & Casualty
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $267M | $625M | $10.01B | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $298M | $978M | $4.33B | $874M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $79M | $571M | $197M |
| Gross Margin | 13.3% | 26.7% | 18.1% | 56.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 10.0% | 17.0% | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 9.1x | 17.1x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $35M | $0.00 | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $678K | $27M | $346M | $107M |
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
| Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NODK is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +4.3% vs ERIE's -38.7%
DGICA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 4.8%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 17.1x)
- 4.8% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs ERIE's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ERIE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.16, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.16 vs NODK's 0.57
- 17.3% ROA vs NODK's 0.5%
PLMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 498.1% 10Y total return vs ERIE's 171.6%
- PEG 0.12 vs DGICA's 2.55
- 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs DGICA's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs NODK's 0.57 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs ERIE's 2.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.3% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs NODK's 0.5% |
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
DGICA leads 2 • ERIE leads 1 • NODK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLMR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ERIE is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 14.5x NODK's $298M. PLMR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's 0.9%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $298M | $978M | $4.3B | $874M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $101M | $786M | $265M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $79M | $571M | $197M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $70M | $537M | $406M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +26.7% | +18.1% | +56.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +10.0% | +17.0% | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +8.1% | +13.2% | +22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +7.2% | +12.4% | +46.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | -3.9% | +2.3% | +62.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | -35.6% | +7.9% | +59.7% |
Valuation Metrics
DGICA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, DGICA trades at a 61% valuation discount to ERIE's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLMR offers better value at 0.16x vs DGICA's 2.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $267M | $625M | $10.0B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $266M | $634M | $9.7B | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 7.90x | 20.41x | 15.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.07x | 17.15x | 11.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.22x | 1.50x | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.29x | 12.14x | 11.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.64x | 2.46x | 3.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.84x | 5.00x | 3.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 133.00x | 8.91x | 17.53x | 7.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE delivers a 25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $1 for NODK. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DGICA's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLMR scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +12.9% | +25.0% | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +3.3% | +17.3% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +12.4% | +29.5% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +16.2% | +32.0% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.05x | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$678,000 | $8M | -$346M | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $678,000 | $27M | $346M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $35M | $0 | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 73.26x | — | 649.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLMR five years ago would be worth $16,795 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,916 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, NODK leads with a +4.3% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLMR at 30.8% vs NODK's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | -9.5% | -20.9% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.3% | -8.9% | -38.7% | -27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.7% | +35.2% | -0.2% | +124.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.8% | +35.8% | +14.8% | +68.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +52.0% | +171.6% | +498.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.9% | +10.6% | -0.1% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NODK and ERIE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ERIE is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NODK currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 0.34x | 0.16x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $21.12 | $380.67 | $175.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.01 | $16.11 | $210.06 | $107.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.9% | +81.5% | +56.9% | +64.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 39.2 | 33.6 | 27.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 17K | 110K | 231K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
DGICA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DGICA as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy". For income investors, DGICA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs ERIE's 2.23%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $110.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +4.8% | +2.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 18 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $4.83 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
PLMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DGICA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NODK vs DGICA vs ERIE vs PLMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
On trailing P/E, Donegal Group Inc.
(DGICA) is the cheapest at 7. 9x versus Erie Indemnity Company at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, Donegal Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Donegal Group Inc. 's 2. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
Over the past 5 years, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) delivered a total return of +68. 0%, compared to -30. 8% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +498. 1% versus NODK's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
16β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning NODK is approximately 247% more volatile than ERIE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 5% for Donegal Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palomar Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 0. 9% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLMR leads at 28. 9% versus 1. 5% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLMR leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Donegal Group Inc. 's 2. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 8. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR?
In this comparison, DGICA (4.
8% yield), ERIE (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NODK, PLMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NODK or DGICA or ERIE or PLMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
16), 2. 2% yield, +171. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ERIE: +171. 6%, NODK: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NODK and DGICA and ERIE and PLMR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DGICA is a small-cap deep-value stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. DGICA, ERIE pay a dividend while NODK, PLMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.