Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $265M | $203M | $415M | $1.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $471M | $90M | $208M | $422M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $83M | $14M | $35M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 50.9% | 54.7% | 51.6% | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 7.0% | 23.3% | 29.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 11.8x | 9.6x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.54B | $52M | $180M | $184M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $496M | $119M | $225M | $57M |
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northpointe Bancsha… (NPB) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.7%, EPS growth 54.0%
- 20.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.45 vs 3.63
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs NPB's 1.04, lower leverage
BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 175.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- PEG 0.22 vs LKFN's 3.63
- +55.7% vs LKFN's +9.0%
LKFN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.2% vs NPB's 2.1%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.45 vs 3.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs NPB's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs LKFN's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories
NPB leads 1 • BWFG leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKFN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPB is the larger business by revenue, generating $471M annually — 5.2x CZWI's $90M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $471M | $90M | $208M | $422M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113M | $9M | $53M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $83M | $14M | $35M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $42M | $11M | -$5M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.9% | +54.7% | +51.6% | +61.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.4% | +7.0% | +23.3% | +29.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +16.0% | +16.9% | +24.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +11.5% | +12.6% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +63.0% | +2.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NPB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NPB trades at a 77% valuation discount to LKFN's 15.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NPB offers better value at 0.25x vs LKFN's 3.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $265M | $203M | $415M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $136M | $370M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.65x | 14.44x | 11.71x | 15.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.56x | 11.78x | 9.62x | 14.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.25x | 2.85x | 0.27x | 3.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.82x | 15.28x | 7.04x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.56x | 2.25x | 2.00x | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 1.09x | 1.35x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.39x | 19.55x | 15.90x | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NPB delivers a 21.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. LKFN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NPB's 2.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs NPB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.0% | +7.8% | +12.2% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.3% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +2.0% | +8.0% | +11.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +0.6% | +4.4% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.70x | 0.28x | 0.60x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | -$67M | -$45M | $127M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $496M | $119M | $225M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $52M | $180M | $184M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 0.16x | 0.49x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BWFG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,005 for NPB. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs LKFN's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPB at 80.7% vs LKFN's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +21.5% | +16.1% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.1% | +45.6% | +55.7% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +489.9% | +160.0% | +144.3% | +48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.9% | +71.2% | +92.1% | +10.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.5% | +157.0% | +175.8% | +142.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.7% | +37.5% | +34.7% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPB's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.46x | 0.84x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.48 | $22.62 | $53.86 | $69.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.52 | $12.83 | $33.26 | $54.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.8% | +93.2% | +96.8% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 63.7 | 55.8 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 174K | 40K | 40K | 153K |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NPB as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 13.1% upside for NPB (target: $20) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs NPB's 1.24%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | — | — | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.8% | +1.5% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.22 | $0.37 | $0.80 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +31.0% | +3.1% | +0.3% | +1.2% |
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NPB vs CZWI vs BWFG vs LKFN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc.
(NPB) is the stronger pick with 20. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. (NPB) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. (NPB) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
On trailing P/E, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc.
(NPB) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation at 15. 6x. On forward P/E, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -69. 9% for Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. (NPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +175. 8% versus NPB's +42. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 04β — meaning NPB is approximately 127% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 3% for Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northpointe Bancshares, Inc.
(NPB) is pulling ahead at 20. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus 16. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LKFN leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. (NPB) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NPB: 13. 1% to $20. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Northpointe Bancshares, Inc. (NPB).
09Is NPB or CZWI or BWFG or LKFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, NPB: +42. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPB and CZWI and BWFG and LKFN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NPB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.