Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NPK vs JRSH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
NPK vs JRSH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $988M | $44M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $474M | $42.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $-477M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 15.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Forward P/E | 30.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $13M |
NPK vs JRSH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Presto Ind… (NPK) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Jerash Holdings (US… (JRSH) | 100 | 72.0 | -28.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPK vs JRSH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth -20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs JRSH's -41.9%
- 29.7% revenue growth vs JRSH's 24.4%
JRSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 8.2%, current ratio 2.75x
- Beta 0.75, yield 5.7%, current ratio 2.75x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs JRSH's 24.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs JRSH's -1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs NPK's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 5.7% yield, vs NPK's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.0% vs JRSH's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs JRSH's -5.7% |
NPK vs JRSH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NPK vs JRSH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JRSH is the larger business by revenue, generating $42.1B annually — 88.7x NPK's $474M. NPK is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JRSH's -1.1%. On growth, NPK holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $474M | $42.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | -$477M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$60M | -$3M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +15.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +0.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | -0.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.7% | +18.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.5% | — |
Valuation Metrics
JRSH leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, JRSH's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPK's 24.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $988M | $44M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $985M | $36M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.05x | -50.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.48x | 7.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-7 for JRSH. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JRSH scores 5/9 vs NPK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | -7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $13M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 11.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPK five years ago would be worth $14,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,071 for JRSH. Over the past 12 months, NPK leads with a +72.0% total return vs JRSH's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPK at 28.1% vs JRSH's -4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.0% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.0% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | -11.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | -29.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | -41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.1% | -4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
JRSH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JRSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPK's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JRSH currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs NPK's 92.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $149.85 | $3.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.63 | $2.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 77.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 68K |
Analyst Outlook
JRSH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, JRSH offers the higher dividend yield at 5.71% vs NPK's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NPK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JRSH leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
NPK vs JRSH: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPK or JRSH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 4% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH). National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NPK or JRSH?
Over the past 5 years, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -29. 3% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPK returned +109. 8% versus JRSH's -41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NPK or JRSH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus National Presto Industries, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning NPK is approximately 23% more volatile than JRSH relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NPK or JRSH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus 24. 4% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. grew EPS 57. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 4% for National Presto Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPK leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NPK or JRSH?
National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus -0. 6% for Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPK leads at 8. 0% versus 1. 0% for JRSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NPK leads at 16. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NPK or JRSH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Jerash Holdings (US), Inc. (JRSH) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 0. 7% for National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK).
07Is NPK or JRSH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jerash Holdings (US), Inc.
(JRSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 5. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JRSH: -41. 9%, NPK: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NPK and JRSH?
These companies operate in different sectors (NPK (Industrials) and JRSH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.