Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NPK vs SJM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
NPK vs SJM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $988M | $10.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $474M | $8.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $-1.26B |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 33.6% |
| Operating Margin | 9.5% | -8.0% |
| Forward P/E | 30.1x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $70M |
NPK vs SJM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Presto Ind… (NPK) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| The J. M. Smucker C… (SJM) | 100 | 85.0 | -15.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPK vs SJM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.7%, EPS growth -20.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 109.8% 10Y total return vs SJM's 3.7%
- 29.7% revenue growth vs SJM's 6.7%
SJM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 4.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.81x
- Beta 0.04, yield 4.4%, current ratio 0.81x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.7% revenue growth vs SJM's 6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 30.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs SJM's -14.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs NPK's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NPK's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +72.0% vs SJM's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.2% ROA vs SJM's -7.7% |
NPK vs SJM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NPK vs SJM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NPK and SJM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SJM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 18.8x NPK's $474M. NPK is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SJM's -14.1%. On growth, NPK holds the edge at +25.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $474M | $8.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | -$595M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | -$1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$60M | $971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +33.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | -8.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.6% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.7% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -34.5% | -9.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SJM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $988M | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $985M | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.05x | -8.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.48x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 1.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NPK delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-24 for SJM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SJM scores 5/9 vs NPK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.4% | -24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.2% | -7.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -1.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPK five years ago would be worth $14,668 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,561 for SJM. Over the past 12 months, NPK leads with a +72.0% total return vs SJM's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPK at 28.1% vs SJM's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.0% | +1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.0% | -10.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | -30.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | -14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.8% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.1% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NPK and SJM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SJM is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPK's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NPK currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs SJM's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $149.85 | $119.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.63 | $88.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.9% | +81.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.1 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 89K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SJM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SJM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.42% vs NPK's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $113.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $4.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
SJM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). NPK leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
NPK vs SJM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPK or SJM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the stronger pick with 29. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 7% for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK) offers the better valuation at 30. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) a "Hold" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NPK or SJM?
Over the past 5 years, National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) delivered a total return of +46. 7%, compared to -14. 4% for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPK returned +109. 8% versus SJM's +3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NPK or SJM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus National Presto Industries, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning NPK is approximately 2069% more volatile than SJM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NPK or SJM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is pulling ahead at 29. 7% versus 6. 7% for The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Presto Industries, Inc. grew EPS -20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -262. 3% for The J. M. Smucker Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPK leads at 16. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NPK or SJM?
National Presto Industries, Inc.
(NPK) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 6% net margin versus -14. 1% for The J. M. Smucker Company — meaning it keeps 6. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPK leads at 8. 0% versus -7. 7% for SJM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SJM leads at 38. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NPK or SJM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 7% for National Presto Industries, Inc. (NPK).
07Is NPK or SJM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The J.
M. Smucker Company (SJM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04), 4. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SJM: +3. 7%, NPK: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NPK and SJM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NPK (Industrials) and SJM (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; SJM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.