NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$6.36B
5Y Perf.+567.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NPO vs GHM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GHM
Graham Corporation
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$1.07B
5Y Perf.+748.6%
NPO vs GHM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NPO | GHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $1.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $238M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $15M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 24.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | 33.7x | 79.7x |
| Total Debt | $655M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $115M | $22M |
NPO vs GHM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NPO
GHM
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnPro Industries, I… (NPO) | 100 | 667.5 | +567.5% |
| Graham Corporation (GHM) | 100 | 848.6 | +748.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPO vs GHM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GHM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. EnPro Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
NPO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 0.4%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs GHM's 439.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, Low D/E 42.4%, current ratio 2.32x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GHM
Graham Corporation
The Growth Play
GHM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.1%, EPS growth 164.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.6%
- 13.1% revenue growth vs NPO's 9.0%
- 6.3% margin vs NPO's 3.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | GHM | 13.1% revenue growth vs NPO's 9.0% |
| Value | NPO | Lower P/E (33.7x vs 79.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | GHM | 6.3% margin vs NPO's 3.5% |
| Stability / Safety | NPO | Beta 1.61 vs GHM's 2.24 |
| Dividends | NPO | 0.4% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | GHM | +192.5% vs NPO's +74.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GHM | 5.1% ROA vs NPO's 1.6%, ROIC 11.3% vs 6.1% |
NPO vs GHM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
NPO vs GHM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNPOLAGGINGGHM
GHMGraham Corporation
2leads
NPOEnPro Industries, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GHMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NPO4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GHM7/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GHM5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NPO2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NPO1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NPO and GHM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 4.8x GHM's $238M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.3% (GHM) to 3.5% (NPO). On growth, GHM holds the edge at +20.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $238M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $15M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +24.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | -2.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | +20.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | +78.6% |
Evenly matched — NPO and GHM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 87.5x trailing earnings, GHM trades at a 44% valuation discount to NPO's 157.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NPO's 26.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GHM's 49.8x.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 157.56x | 87.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.74x | 79.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.07x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.09x | 49.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.56x | 5.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.09x | 8.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.94x | 199.05x |
NPO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHM delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $3 for NPO. GHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NPO's 0.42x.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $541M | -$15M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $115M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $655M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | — |
GHM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHM five years ago would be worth $67,226 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $32,941 for NPO. Over the past 12 months, GHM leads with a +192.5% total return vs NPO's +74.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHM at 98.2% vs NPO's 47.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +46.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.7% | +192.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.7% | +679.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.4% | +572.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +575.2% | +439.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +98.2% |
GHM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NPO is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHM's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 2.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $310.13 | $100.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.56 | $32.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 127K |
NPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NPO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NPO as "Buy" and GHM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.1% upside for NPO (target: $298) vs -17.6% for GHM (target: $80). NPO is the only dividend payer here at 0.41% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GHMGraham Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $297.50 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
NPO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
NPO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). GHM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NPO vs GHM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPO or GHM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Graham Corporation (GHM) is the stronger pick with 13.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 0% for EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO). Graham Corporation (GHM) offers the better valuation at 87. 5x trailing P/E (79. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPO or GHM?
On trailing P/E, Graham Corporation (GHM) is the cheapest at 87.
5x versus EnPro Industries, Inc. at 157. 6x. On forward P/E, EnPro Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPO or GHM?
Over the past 5 years, Graham Corporation (GHM) delivered a total return of +572.
3%, compared to +229. 4% for EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NPO returned +575. 2% versus GHM's +439. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPO or GHM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 61β versus Graham Corporation's 2. 24β — meaning GHM is approximately 39% more volatile than NPO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graham Corporation (GHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 42% for EnPro Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPO or GHM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Graham Corporation (GHM) is pulling ahead at 13.
1% versus 9. 0% for EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Graham Corporation grew EPS 164. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 6% for EnPro Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GHM leads at 19. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPO or GHM?
Graham Corporation (GHM) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus 3. 5% for EnPro Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NPO leads at 14. 1% versus 7. 2% for GHM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NPO leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPO or GHM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) trades at 33. 7x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Graham Corporation — 46. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NPO: -1. 1% to $297. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPO or GHM?
In this comparison, NPO (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. GHM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NPO or GHM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+575. 2% 10Y return). Graham Corporation (GHM) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NPO: +575. 2%, GHM: +439. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPO and GHM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NPO: 14.3% · GHM: 20.5%)Net Margin>
%
(NPO: 3.5% · GHM: 6.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NPO: 157.6x · GHM: 87.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.