NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$6.36B
5Y Perf.+567.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NPO vs GTLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$9.93B
5Y Perf.+428.4%
NPO vs GTLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NPO | GTLS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $9.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.14B | $4.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 42.6% | 32.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.1% | 8.5% |
| Forward P/E | 33.7x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $655M | $3.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $115M | $366M |
NPO vs GTLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NPO
GTLS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnPro Industries, I… (NPO) | 100 | 667.5 | +567.5% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPO vs GTLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NPO leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Chart Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NPO
EnPro Industries, Inc.
The Income Pick
NPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.61, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -44.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.61, Low D/E 42.4%, current ratio 2.32x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GTLS
Chart Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs NPO's 5.8%
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 33.7x)
- Beta 0.56 vs NPO's 1.61
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NPO | 9.0% revenue growth vs GTLS's 2.5% |
| Value | GTLS | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 33.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | NPO | 3.5% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLS | Beta 0.56 vs NPO's 1.61 |
| Dividends | NPO | 0.4% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs GTLS's 0.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NPO | +74.7% vs GTLS's +37.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NPO | 1.6% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 6.1% vs 7.4% |
NPO vs GTLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
NPO vs GTLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNPOLAGGINGGTLS
GTLSChart Industries, Inc.
2leads
NPOEnPro Industries, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs GTLSMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NPO5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GTLS4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NPO7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NPO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
GTLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NPO2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 3.7x NPO's $1.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.5% (NPO) to 0.9% (GTLS). On growth, NPO holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $264M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $203M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.6% | +32.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.1% | +8.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.3% | -2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | -36.1% |
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 157.6x trailing earnings, NPO trades at a 75% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GTLS's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NPO's 26.1x.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 157.56x | 628.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 33.74x | 16.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.09x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.56x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.09x | 2.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.94x | 48.95x |
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NPO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NPO delivers a 2.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. NPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.42x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPO scores 7/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 1.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $541M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $115M | $366M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $655M | $3.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | 1.08x |
NPO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NPO five years ago would be worth $32,941 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,951 for GTLS. Over the past 12 months, NPO leads with a +74.7% total return vs GTLS's +37.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NPO at 47.2% vs GTLS's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +37.4% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.7% | +37.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.7% | +62.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.4% | +29.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +575.2% | +772.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +17.6% |
NPO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NPO's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 0.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $310.13 | $208.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.56 | $140.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.0% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.3 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 242K | 1.6M |
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NPO as "Buy" and GTLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -1.1% upside for NPO (target: $298) vs -6.5% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, NPO offers the higher dividend yield at 0.41% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | NPOEnPro Industries,… | GTLSChart Industries,… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $297.50 | $193.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $0.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
NPO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallEnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NPO vs GTLS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPO or GTLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the stronger pick with 9. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) offers the better valuation at 157. 6x trailing P/E (33. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPO or GTLS?
On trailing P/E, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the cheapest at 157. 6x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPO or GTLS?
Over the past 5 years, EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) delivered a total return of +229. 4%, compared to +29. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 5% versus NPO's +575. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPO or GTLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus EnPro Industries, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning NPO is approximately 189% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 42% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPO or GTLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is pulling ahead at 9. 0% versus 2. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EnPro Industries, Inc. grew EPS -44. 6% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPO or GTLS?
EnPro Industries, Inc.
(NPO) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 5% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLS leads at 15. 2% versus 14. 1% for NPO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NPO leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPO or GTLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 33. 7x for EnPro Industries, Inc. — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NPO: -1. 1% to $297. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPO or GTLS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) offers the highest yield at 0. 4%, versus 0. 3% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS).
09Is NPO or GTLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +772. 5% 10Y return). EnPro Industries, Inc. (NPO) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 5%, NPO: +575. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPO and GTLS?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NPO: 14.3% · GTLS: -2.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NPO: 157.6x · GTLS: 628.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.