Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NSC vs WAB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation

Railroads

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$70.38B
5Y Perf.+75.8%
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation

Railroads

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$45.09B
5Y Perf.+335.1%

NSC vs WAB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NSC logoNSC
WAB logoWAB
IndustryRailroadsRailroads
Market Cap$70.38B$45.09B
Revenue (TTM)$12.19B$11.51B
Net Income (TTM)$2.67B$1.21B
Gross Margin51.1%33.8%
Operating Margin32.4%16.1%
Forward P/E25.9x25.0x
Total Debt$17.09B$5.54B
Cash & Equiv.$1.53B$789M

NSC vs WABLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NSC
WAB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Norfolk Southern Co… (NSC)100175.8+75.8%
Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB)100435.1+335.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NSC vs WAB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NSC leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
The Income Pick

NSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 1.7%
  • 301.1% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.85x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
WAB
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
The Growth Play

WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.

  • Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
  • PEG 0.97 vs NSC's 2.54
  • 7.5% revenue growth vs NSC's 0.5%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWAB logoWAB7.5% revenue growth vs NSC's 0.5%
ValueWAB logoWABLower P/E (25.0x vs 25.9x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.54
Quality / MarginsNSC logoNSC21.9% margin vs WAB's 10.5%
Stability / SafetyNSC logoNSCBeta 0.63 vs WAB's 1.11
DividendsNSC logoNSC1.7% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4%
Momentum (1Y)NSC logoNSC+44.3% vs WAB's +40.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NSC logoNSC6.0% ROA vs WAB's 5.6%, ROIC 9.8% vs 9.6%

NSC vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NSCNorfolk Southern Corporation
FY 2025
Railway Operating Revenues Market Group Merchandise
63.1%$7.7B
Railway Operating Revenues Market Group Intermodal
24.7%$3.0B
Railway Operating Revenues Market Group Coal
12.2%$1.5B
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
FY 2025
Freight Segment
72.0%$8.0B
Transit Segment
28.0%$3.1B

NSC vs WAB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNSCLAGGINGWAB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NSC and WAB operate at a comparable scale, with $12.2B and $11.5B in trailing revenue. NSC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAB's 10.5%. On growth, WAB holds the edge at +13.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$12.2B$11.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.0B$2.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2.7B$1.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$4.2B$1.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.1%+33.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+32.4%+16.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.9%+10.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+34.5%+14.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.2%+13.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-26.6%+12.8%
NSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 24.6x trailing earnings, NSC trades at a 37% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAB offers better value at 1.51x vs NSC's 2.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
Market CapShares × price$70.4B$45.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$85.9B$49.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.58x38.90x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.89x25.05x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.41x1.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.91x21.03x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.78x4.04x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.53x4.06x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF32.63x30.08x
WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NSC delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for WAB. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSC's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSC scores 7/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.4%+10.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.0%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.8%+9.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.8%+11.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.10x0.50x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15.6B$4.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.5B$789M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$17.1B$5.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.15x7.41x
WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,666 for NSC. Over the past 12 months, NSC leads with a +44.3% total return vs WAB's +40.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 39.3% vs NSC's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.4%+23.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.3%+40.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+58.5%+170.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+16.7%+229.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+301.1%+247.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+16.6%+39.3%
WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.63x1.11x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$323.37$275.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$218.89$184.26
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.9%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.058.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M905K
NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates NSC as "Hold" and WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs 5.9% for NSC (target: $332). For income investors, NSC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs WAB's 0.38%.

MetricNSC logoNSCNorfolk Southern …WAB logoWABWestinghouse Air …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$332.00$291.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts4834
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises246
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.40$1.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.8%+0.5%
NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WAB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallNorfolk Southern Corporation (NSC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NSC vs WAB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NSC or WAB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (25. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NSC or WAB?

On trailing P/E, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the cheapest at 24.

6x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus Norfolk Southern Corporation's 2. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NSC or WAB?

Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.

0%, compared to +16. 7% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSC returned +301. 1% versus WAB's +247. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NSC or WAB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

63β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 75% more volatile than NSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 110% for Norfolk Southern Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NSC or WAB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.

5% versus 0. 5% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for Norfolk Southern Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NSC or WAB?

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

6% net margin versus 10. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSC leads at 32. 9% versus 16. 7% for WAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSC leads at 42. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NSC or WAB more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Norfolk Southern Corporation's 2. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Norfolk Southern Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 9. 5% to $291. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NSC or WAB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).

09

Is NSC or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

63), 1. 7% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NSC: +301. 1%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NSC and WAB?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

NSC pays a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NSC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WAB

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NSC and WAB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NSC: 0.2% · WAB: 13.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(NSC: 21.9% · WAB: 10.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NSC: 24.6x · WAB: 38.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.