Railroads
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NSC vs WAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Railroads
NSC vs WAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Railroads | Railroads |
| Market Cap | $70.38B | $45.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.19B | $11.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.67B | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 51.1% | 33.8% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $17.09B | $5.54B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.53B | $789M |
NSC vs WAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Norfolk Southern Co… (NSC) | 100 | 175.8 | +75.8% |
| Westinghouse Air Br… (WAB) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSC vs WAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 1.7%
- 301.1% 10Y total return vs WAB's 247.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 0.85x
WAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 13.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- PEG 0.97 vs NSC's 2.54
- 7.5% revenue growth vs NSC's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% revenue growth vs NSC's 0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 25.9x), PEG 0.97 vs 2.54 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.9% margin vs WAB's 10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs WAB's 1.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 24-year raise streak, vs WAB's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.3% vs WAB's +40.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs WAB's 5.6%, ROIC 9.8% vs 9.6% |
NSC vs WAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NSC vs WAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NSC and WAB operate at a comparable scale, with $12.2B and $11.5B in trailing revenue. NSC is the more profitable business, keeping 21.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAB's 10.5%. On growth, WAB holds the edge at +13.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.2B | $11.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.0B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.2B | $1.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.1% | +33.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.2% | +13.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.6% | +12.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.6x trailing earnings, NSC trades at a 37% valuation discount to WAB's 38.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAB offers better value at 1.51x vs NSC's 2.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $70.4B | $45.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $85.9B | $49.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.58x | 38.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.89x | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.41x | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.91x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.78x | 4.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.53x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 32.63x | 30.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WAB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NSC delivers a 17.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $11 for WAB. WAB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSC's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSC scores 7/9 vs WAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.10x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15.6B | $4.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $789M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.1B | $5.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.15x | 7.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WAB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAB five years ago would be worth $32,899 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,666 for NSC. Over the past 12 months, NSC leads with a +44.3% total return vs WAB's +40.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WAB at 39.3% vs NSC's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.4% | +23.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.3% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.5% | +170.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | +229.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.1% | +247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NSC is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WAB's 1.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 1.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $323.37 | $275.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $218.89 | $184.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.0 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 905K |
Analyst Outlook
NSC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NSC as "Hold" and WAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for WAB (target: $291) vs 5.9% for NSC (target: $332). For income investors, NSC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.72% vs WAB's 0.38%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $332.00 | $291.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 24 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.40 | $1.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.5% |
NSC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). WAB leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
NSC vs WAB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSC or WAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the stronger pick with 7.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (25. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSC or WAB?
On trailing P/E, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the cheapest at 24.
6x versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation at 38. 9x. On forward P/E, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation wins at 0. 97x versus Norfolk Southern Corporation's 2. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSC or WAB?
Over the past 5 years, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to +16. 7% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSC returned +301. 1% versus WAB's +247. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSC or WAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
63β versus Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation's 1. 11β — meaning WAB is approximately 75% more volatile than NSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 110% for Norfolk Southern Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSC or WAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is pulling ahead at 7.
5% versus 0. 5% for Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation grew EPS 13. 1% year-over-year, compared to 10. 2% for Norfolk Southern Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WAB leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSC or WAB?
Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
6% net margin versus 10. 5% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NSC leads at 32. 9% versus 16. 7% for WAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSC leads at 42. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSC or WAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus Norfolk Southern Corporation's 2. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for Norfolk Southern Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WAB: 9. 5% to $291. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSC or WAB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 0. 4% for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation (WAB).
09Is NSC or WAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 1. 7% yield, +301. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NSC: +301. 1%, WAB: +247. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSC and WAB?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NSC pays a dividend while WAB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.