Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Information Technology Services
Technology Distributors
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $2.17B | $6.62B | $14.22B | $18.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.27B | $24.96B | $22.90B | $62.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $180M | $214M | $1.08B | $828M |
| Gross Margin | 22.0% | 10.5% | 21.6% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 2.7% | 7.3% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 16.2x | 10.5x | 13.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.59B | $2.88B | $6.33B | $4.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $358M | $192M | $619M | $2.44B |
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 137.3 | +37.3% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
| CDW Corporation (CDW) | 100 | 99.4 | -0.6% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 435.1 | +335.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.9x)
AVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
CDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 2.3%
- 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
- Beta 1.15 vs SNX's 1.43
- 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs CDW's 210.7%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6%
- +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 13.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs SNX's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.2% vs NSIT's -47.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 15.4% vs 6.0% |
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • AVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 7.6x NSIT's $8.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (CDW) to 0.9% (AVT). On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.3B | $25.0B | $22.9B | $62.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $477M | $781M | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $180M | $214M | $1.1B | $828M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $235M | $33M | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +10.5% | +21.6% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +2.7% | +7.3% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +0.9% | +4.7% | +1.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +0.1% | +4.7% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.2% | +33.9% | +9.2% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +12.9% | +7.7% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CDW trades at a 54% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NSIT's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVT's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $6.6B | $14.2B | $18.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $9.3B | $19.9B | $20.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.48x | 29.40x | 13.64x | 23.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.60x | 16.22x | 10.47x | 13.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.05x | 12.44x | 10.21x | 11.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.30x | 0.63x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.38x | 1.41x | 5.59x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.77x | 11.47x | 13.06x | 13.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. SNX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDW's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSIT scores 6/9 vs CDW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +4.3% | +42.4% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.7% | +6.8% | +2.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.3% | +6.0% | +15.4% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +7.9% | +18.4% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 0.57x | 2.43x | 0.55x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $2.7B | $5.7B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $358M | $192M | $619M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $2.9B | $6.3B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.97x | 2.80x | 11.25x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $19,416 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,954 for CDW. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.2% total return vs NSIT's -47.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 39.3% vs NSIT's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.2% | +64.6% | -16.8% | +52.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.2% | +65.6% | -35.8% | +103.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.3% | +105.0% | -29.2% | +170.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.7% | +94.1% | -30.5% | +94.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.2% | +132.4% | +210.7% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.2% | +27.0% | -10.9% | +39.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CDW and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CDW is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNX's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs NSIT's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.27x | 1.15x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.58 | $84.72 | $192.30 | $237.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.62 | $44.25 | $106.00 | $114.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.4% | +95.4% | +57.3% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 76.9 | 27.6 | 80.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 441K | 1.0M | 1.6M | 735K |
Analyst Outlook
CDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NSIT as "Buy", AVT as "Hold", CDW as "Buy", SNX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for CDW (target: $162) vs -23.9% for SNX (target: $177). For income investors, CDW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs SNX's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $90.00 | $79.33 | $162.40 | $177.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 20 | 18 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +2.3% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 12 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.30 | $2.49 | $1.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +4.6% | +4.6% | +3.3% |
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NSIT vs AVT vs CDW vs SNX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 13.
6x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +94.
2%, compared to -30. 5% for CDW Corporation (CDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +505. 0% versus AVT's +132. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CDW Corporation (CDW) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
15β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 24% more volatile than CDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDW leads at 7. 4% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDW leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc.
(NSIT) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 9. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDW: 47. 4% to $162. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX?
In this comparison, CDW (2.
3% yield), AVT (1. 6% yield), SNX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NSIT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NSIT or AVT or CDW or SNX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
15), 2. 3% yield, +210. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDW: +210. 7%, NSIT: +194. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NSIT and AVT and CDW and SNX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AVT, CDW, SNX pay a dividend while NSIT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.