Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $76M | $796M | $1.34B | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $86M | $1.52B | $2.92B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306K | $49M | $-359M | $82M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 10.8% | 5.8% | 22.9% |
| Operating Margin | -4.3% | 4.2% | -4.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 4438.9x | 15.7x | — | 42.3x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $381M | $3.59B | $160M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $20M | $211M | $5M |
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Technologi… (NTIC) | 100 | 107.8 | +7.8% |
| AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) | 100 | 202.8 | +102.8% |
| Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
| Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) | 100 | 778.6 | +678.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTIC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 17.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage
ASIX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TROX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 2.37, yield 3.6%, current ratio 2.46x
- 3.6% yield, vs HWKN's 0.4%
- +76.9% vs ASIX's +8.2%
HWKN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs ASIX's 60.6%
- PEG 1.70 vs ASIX's 8.38
- 6.0% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% revenue growth vs TROX's -5.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs TROX's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs TROX's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, vs HWKN's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.9% vs ASIX's +8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs TROX's -7.7%, ROIC 15.9% vs -0.3% |
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HWKN leads in 3 of 6 categories
ASIX leads 1 • NTIC leads 0 • TROX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWKN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TROX is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 33.9x NTIC's $86M. HWKN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TROX's -12.3%. On growth, ASIX holds the edge at +9.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $86M | $1.5B | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $143M | $166M | $172M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305,653 | $49M | -$359M | $82M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $6M | -$139M | $88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +10.8% | +5.8% | +22.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +4.2% | -4.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.4% | +3.2% | -12.3% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.6% | +0.4% | -4.8% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +9.4% | +3.0% | +7.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -47.8% | -8.8% | +7.1% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ASIX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, ASIX trades at a 100% valuation discount to NTIC's 4438.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HWKN offers better value at 1.67x vs ASIX's 7.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $796M | $1.3B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $1.2B | $4.7B | $3.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4438.89x | 13.34x | -2.83x | 41.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.74x | — | 42.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.10x | — | 1.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.86x | 16.80x | 22.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 0.52x | 0.46x | 3.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 0.80x | 0.92x | 7.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 124.10x | — | 49.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWKN delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-30 for TROX. NTIC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TROX's 2.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ASIX scores 6/9 vs TROX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.4% | +6.0% | -30.4% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.3% | +2.9% | -7.7% | +8.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.6% | +4.4% | -0.3% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.7% | +5.3% | -0.4% | +19.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.47x | 2.48x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $361M | $3.4B | $155M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $20M | $211M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $381M | $3.6B | $160M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.11x | 7.92x | -1.16x | 10.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWKN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,493 for TROX. Over the past 12 months, TROX leads with a +76.9% total return vs ASIX's +8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs ASIX's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.5% | +40.3% | +98.1% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.9% | +8.2% | +76.9% | +40.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | -25.6% | -23.6% | +318.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.7% | -15.9% | -55.1% | +391.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.6% | +60.6% | +116.1% | +765.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -9.1% | -9.4% | -8.6% | +61.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTIC and ASIX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TROX's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ASIX currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs TROX's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 0.81x | 2.37x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.03 | $26.73 | $10.59 | $186.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.10 | $14.10 | $2.86 | $115.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.7% | +89.8% | +79.4% | +89.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.8 | 60.6 | 58.5 | 62.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 453K | 3.1M | 169K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROX and HWKN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ASIX as "Buy", TROX as "Buy", HWKN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -8.4% upside for ASIX (target: $22) vs -13.8% for TROX (target: $7). For income investors, TROX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.60% vs HWKN's 0.42%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.00 | $7.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 17 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +2.6% | +3.6% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.16 | $0.63 | $0.30 | $0.70 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
HWKN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ASIX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NTIC vs ASIX vs TROX vs HWKN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
On trailing P/E, AdvanSix Inc.
(ASIX) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus Northern Technologies International Corporation at 4438. 9x. On forward P/E, AdvanSix Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Hawkins, Inc. wins at 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -55. 1% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +765. 9% versus NTIC's +39. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Tronox Holdings plc's 2. 37β — meaning TROX is approximately 529% more volatile than NTIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -5. 7% for Tronox Holdings plc (TROX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hawkins, Inc. grew EPS 12. 3% year-over-year, compared to -890. 0% for Tronox Holdings plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
Hawkins, Inc.
(HWKN) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 7% net margin versus -16. 2% for Tronox Holdings plc — meaning it keeps 8. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HWKN leads at 12. 2% versus -7. 1% for NTIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTIC leads at 37. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 70x versus AdvanSix Inc. 's 8. 38x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Hawkins, Inc. — 26. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ASIX: -8. 4% to $22. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).
09Is NTIC or ASIX or TROX or HWKN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northern Technologies International Corporation (NTIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
38), 2. 0% yield). Tronox Holdings plc (TROX) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTIC: +39. 6%, TROX: +116. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTIC and ASIX and TROX and HWKN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ASIX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TROX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NTIC, ASIX, TROX pay a dividend while HWKN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.