NUAI vs AIOT vs AEYE vs GFAI vs BBAI

For growth investors, New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.

(NUAI) is the stronger pick with 66. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Analysts rate PowerFleet, Inc. (AIOT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.

(NUAI) delivered a total return of +1254%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUAI returned +1254% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 18β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 52% more volatile than AEYE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for AudioEye, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.

(NUAI) is pulling ahead at 66. 2% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIOT leads at 42. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -33. 4% for New Era Energy & Digital, Inc. — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIOT leads at -7. 1% versus -1405. 1% for NUAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, AIOT (23.

1% yield) pays a dividend. NUAI, AEYE, GFAI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, New Era Energy & Digital, Inc.

(NUAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1254% 10Y return). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NUAI: +1254%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NUAI (Energy) and AIOT (Technology) and AEYE (Technology) and GFAI (Industrials) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NUAI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIOT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. AIOT pays a dividend while NUAI, AEYE, GFAI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.