Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Information Technology Services
Specialty Business Services
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Information Technology Services | Specialty Business Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $477M | $24.47B | $16.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $521M | $10.89B | $8.83B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-71M | $33M | $382M | $-706M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 7.6% | 38.1% | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | -239.8% | -3.8% | 17.5% | 16.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.5x | 7.5x | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $217M | $4.01B | $21.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $169M | $599M | $8.34B |
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 117.1 | +17.1% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| Global Payments Inc. (GPN) | 100 | 43.0 | -57.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUKK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IMXI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 63.5% 10Y total return vs GPN's 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
- 6.3% margin vs NUKK's -144.1%
- Beta 0.37 vs NUKK's 2.26
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth -47.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- 5.4% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5%
GPN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.21 vs IMXI's 2.50
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.21 vs 0.31
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% revenue growth vs NUKK's -63.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.21 vs 0.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs NUKK's -144.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs NUKK's 2.26 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GPN's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.6% vs NUKK's -91.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs NUKK's -5.4% |
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 3 of 6 categories
IMXI leads 2 • GPN leads 1 • NUKK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS and NUKK operate at a comparable scale, with $10.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. IMXI is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NUKK's -144.1%. On growth, GPN holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $521M | $10.9B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$168M | -$3M | $3.8B | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$71M | $33M | $382M | -$706M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $16M | $2.8B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +7.6% | +38.1% | +48.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -3.8% | +17.5% | +16.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -144.1% | +6.3% | +3.5% | -8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.6% | +3.0% | +26.1% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -63.4% | +8.2% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.5% | -38.8% | +92.3% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GPN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, GPN trades at a 81% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GPN offers better value at 0.49x vs IMXI's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $477M | $24.5B | $16.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $525M | $27.9B | $30.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | 14.69x | 63.00x | 12.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.45x | 7.54x | 5.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.51x | 2.58x | 0.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.66x | 10.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 0.92x | 2.29x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.97x | 1.76x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.18x | 9.97x | 8.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMXI delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-3 for GPN. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IMXI's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIS scores 6/9 vs NUKK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.1% | +2.7% | -3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +6.5% | +1.1% | -1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -7.6% | +6.0% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.8% | +6.6% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.34x | 0.29x | 0.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $48M | $3.4B | $13.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,678 | $169M | $599M | $8.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $217M | $4.0B | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -76.40x | -1.69x | 4.64x | 6.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMXI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMXI five years ago would be worth $10,938 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $220 for NUKK. Over the past 12 months, IMXI leads with a +51.6% total return vs NUKK's -91.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIS at -2.2% vs NUKK's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.1% | +3.4% | -27.3% | -6.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.5% | +51.6% | -35.3% | -9.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -38.0% | -6.6% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +9.4% | -63.2% | -62.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | +63.5% | -13.2% | +4.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.9% | -14.8% | -2.2% | -11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
IMXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUKK's 2.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs NUKK's 4.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.26x | 0.37x | 0.76x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.21 | $15.95 | $82.74 | $90.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.20 | $8.58 | $43.30 | $62.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.8% | +99.4% | +57.1% | +77.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 27.5 | 46.9 | 43.3 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 358K | 5.5M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
FIS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMXI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", GPN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for IMXI (target: $27) vs 26.1% for GPN (target: $88). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs GPN's 1.42%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 | $67.38 | $88.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 37 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.5% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.63 | $0.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | 0.0% | +7.4% |
FIS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMXI leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
NUKK vs IMXI vs FIS vs GPN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Global Payments Inc. (GPN) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
On trailing P/E, Global Payments Inc.
(GPN) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Global Payments Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Global Payments Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
Over the past 5 years, International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) delivered a total return of +9. 4%, compared to -97. 8% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMXI returned +63. 5% versus NUKK's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus Nukkleus Inc. 's 2. 26β — meaning NUKK is approximately 508% more volatile than IMXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 134% for International Money Express, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -63. 5% for Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nukkleus Inc. grew EPS 64. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIS leads at 3. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
Global Payments Inc.
(GPN) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -144. 1% for Nukkleus Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPN leads at 19. 1% versus -239. 8% for NUKK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPN leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Global Payments Inc. (GPN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Global Payments Inc. (GPN) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 5x for International Money Express, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMXI: 70. 2% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), GPN (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. NUKK, IMXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NUKK or IMXI or FIS or GPN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
(FIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 3. 5% yield). Nukkleus Inc. (NUKK) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FIS: -13. 2%, NUKK: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NUKK and IMXI and FIS and GPN?
These companies operate in different sectors (NUKK (Technology) and IMXI (Technology) and FIS (Technology) and GPN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NUKK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMXI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; GPN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FIS, GPN pay a dividend while NUKK, IMXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.