Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
IMXI vs WU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
IMXI vs WU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $646M | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $625M | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $441M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 28.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169M | $1.23B |
IMXI vs WU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 143.7 | +43.7% |
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 44.9 | -55.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMXI vs WU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMXI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.37
- 63.8% 10Y total return vs WU's -6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
WU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -4.0%, EPS growth -44.2%
- -4.0% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -7.7%
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.0% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs IMXI's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs WU's 0.63 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +25.8% vs WU's +3.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs WU's 5.5%, ROIC 46.8% vs 23.3% |
IMXI vs WU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMXI vs WU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WU leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WU is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 6.5x IMXI's $625M. WU is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMXI's 6.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $625M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $85M | $838M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $441M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $331M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +28.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.9% | -44.4% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 59% valuation discount to IMXI's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WU's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IMXI's 6.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $646M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $478M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.71x | 5.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.45x | 5.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.52x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.56x | 1.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.98x | 3.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.87x | 7.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMXI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WU delivers a 47.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $28 for IMXI.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.6% | +47.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +46.8% | +23.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$169M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.25x | 2.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMXI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMXI five years ago would be worth $10,766 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,530 for WU. Over the past 12 months, IMXI leads with a +25.8% total return vs WU's +3.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WU at -0.6% vs IMXI's -15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.8% | +3.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | -1.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.7% | -44.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.8% | -6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.5% | -0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
IMXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WU's 0.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs WU's 88.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $10.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.58 | $7.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 380K | 8.3M |
Analyst Outlook
WU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates IMXI as "Buy" and WU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.9% upside for IMXI (target: $27) vs -1.3% for WU (target: $9). WU is the only dividend payer here at 10.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +8.2% |
WU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMXI leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
IMXI vs WU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMXI or WU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Western Union Company (WU) is the stronger pick with -4.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 7% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMXI or WU?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 6.
0x versus International Money Express, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMXI or WU?
Over the past 5 years, International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) delivered a total return of +7. 7%, compared to -44. 7% for The Western Union Company (WU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMXI returned +63. 4% versus WU's -7. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMXI or WU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus The Western Union Company's 0. 63β — meaning WU is approximately 68% more volatile than IMXI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — IMXI or WU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Western Union Company (WU) is pulling ahead at -4.
0% versus -7. 7% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Money Express, Inc. grew EPS -39. 7% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for The Western Union Company. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMXI or WU?
The Western Union Company (WU) is the more profitable company, earning 12.
4% net margin versus 5. 4% for International Money Express, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WU leads at 19. 4% versus 9. 2% for IMXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMXI leads at 87. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMXI or WU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5.
1x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for International Money Express, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMXI: 69. 9% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMXI or WU?
In this comparison, WU (10.
3% yield) pays a dividend. IMXI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMXI or WU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Western Union Company (WU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
63), 10. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WU: -7. 6%, IMXI: +63. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMXI and WU?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMXI (Technology) and WU (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WU pays a dividend while IMXI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare IMXI vs EEFT
EEFT is one of the most direct listed alternatives to IMXI.
Compare WU vs PYPL
PYPL overlaps with WU in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With EEFT + V
EEFT and V are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.