Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NUVL vs TARS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
NUVL vs TARS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $6.92B | $2.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $535M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-381M | $-48M |
| Gross Margin | — | 90.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | -9.5% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $94M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $146M | $184M |
NUVL vs TARS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 571.3 | +471.3% |
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 286.9 | +186.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NUVL vs TARS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NUVL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 456.1% 10Y total return vs TARS's 214.7%
- 3.4% margin vs TARS's -9.0%
- +52.9% vs TARS's +39.4%
TARS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.65
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 27.3%, current ratio 3.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs NUVL's 38.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs TARS's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs NUVL's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.9% vs TARS's +39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -8.9% ROA vs NUVL's -38.9%, ROIC -23.4% vs -32.6% |
NUVL vs TARS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NUVL vs TARS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TARS and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $535M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $535M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$408M | -$49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$381M | -$48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$264M | -$32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +90.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +106.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.8% | +75.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NUVL and TARS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.8B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.53x | -40.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.47x | 7.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TARS delivers a -14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-45 for NUVL. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.1% | -14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -38.9% | -8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -32.6% | -23.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.4% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$146M | -$90M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $146M | $184M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $94M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -15.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $55,605 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,691 for TARS. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +52.9% total return vs TARS's +39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARS at 60.8% vs NUVL's 40.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | -19.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.9% | +39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.1% | +315.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +456.1% | +126.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +456.1% | +214.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.3% | +60.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NUVL and TARS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TARS is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVL's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVL currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs TARS's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $113.02 | $85.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.56 | $38.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +76.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 539K | 485K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NUVL as "Buy" and TARS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.5% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 37.9% for TARS (target: $89).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $144.40 | $89.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TARS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NUVL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
NUVL vs TARS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NUVL or TARS a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NUVL or TARS?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to +126. 9% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NUVL returned +456. 1% versus TARS's +214. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NUVL or TARS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Nuvalent, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning NUVL is approximately 68% more volatile than TARS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NUVL or TARS?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -81. 1% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NUVL or TARS?
Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NUVL leads at 0. 0% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NUVL or TARS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NUVL or TARS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), +214. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TARS: +214. 7%, NUVL: +456. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NUVL and TARS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.